Cargando…
The economic impact of a bioterrorist attack: are prevention and postattack intervention programs justifiable?
Understanding and quantifying the impact of a bioterrorist attack are essential in developing public health preparedness for such an attack. We constructed a model that compares the impact of three classic agents of biologic warfare (Bacillus anthracis, Brucella melitensis, and Francisella tularensi...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
1997
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2627615/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9204289 |
_version_ | 1782163556071899136 |
---|---|
author | Kaufmann, A F Meltzer, M I Schmid, G P |
author_facet | Kaufmann, A F Meltzer, M I Schmid, G P |
author_sort | Kaufmann, A F |
collection | PubMed |
description | Understanding and quantifying the impact of a bioterrorist attack are essential in developing public health preparedness for such an attack. We constructed a model that compares the impact of three classic agents of biologic warfare (Bacillus anthracis, Brucella melitensis, and Francisella tularensis) when released as aerosols in the suburb of a major city. The model shows that the economic impact of a bioterrorist attack can range from an estimated $477.7 million per 100,000 persons exposed (brucellosis scenario) to $26.2 billion per 100,000 persons exposed (anthrax scenario). Rapid implementation of a postattack prophylaxis program is the single most important means of reducing these losses. By using an insurance analogy, our model provides economic justification for preparedness measures. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2627615 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1997 |
publisher | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26276152009-05-20 The economic impact of a bioterrorist attack: are prevention and postattack intervention programs justifiable? Kaufmann, A F Meltzer, M I Schmid, G P Emerg Infect Dis Research Article Understanding and quantifying the impact of a bioterrorist attack are essential in developing public health preparedness for such an attack. We constructed a model that compares the impact of three classic agents of biologic warfare (Bacillus anthracis, Brucella melitensis, and Francisella tularensis) when released as aerosols in the suburb of a major city. The model shows that the economic impact of a bioterrorist attack can range from an estimated $477.7 million per 100,000 persons exposed (brucellosis scenario) to $26.2 billion per 100,000 persons exposed (anthrax scenario). Rapid implementation of a postattack prophylaxis program is the single most important means of reducing these losses. By using an insurance analogy, our model provides economic justification for preparedness measures. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1997 /pmc/articles/PMC2627615/ /pubmed/9204289 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kaufmann, A F Meltzer, M I Schmid, G P The economic impact of a bioterrorist attack: are prevention and postattack intervention programs justifiable? |
title | The economic impact of a bioterrorist attack: are prevention and postattack intervention programs justifiable? |
title_full | The economic impact of a bioterrorist attack: are prevention and postattack intervention programs justifiable? |
title_fullStr | The economic impact of a bioterrorist attack: are prevention and postattack intervention programs justifiable? |
title_full_unstemmed | The economic impact of a bioterrorist attack: are prevention and postattack intervention programs justifiable? |
title_short | The economic impact of a bioterrorist attack: are prevention and postattack intervention programs justifiable? |
title_sort | economic impact of a bioterrorist attack: are prevention and postattack intervention programs justifiable? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2627615/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9204289 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kaufmannaf theeconomicimpactofabioterroristattackarepreventionandpostattackinterventionprogramsjustifiable AT meltzermi theeconomicimpactofabioterroristattackarepreventionandpostattackinterventionprogramsjustifiable AT schmidgp theeconomicimpactofabioterroristattackarepreventionandpostattackinterventionprogramsjustifiable AT kaufmannaf economicimpactofabioterroristattackarepreventionandpostattackinterventionprogramsjustifiable AT meltzermi economicimpactofabioterroristattackarepreventionandpostattackinterventionprogramsjustifiable AT schmidgp economicimpactofabioterroristattackarepreventionandpostattackinterventionprogramsjustifiable |