Cargando…
DDT, global strategies, and a malaria control crisis in South America.
Malaria is reemerging in endemic-disease countries of South America. We examined the rate of real growth in annual parasite indexes (API) by adjusting APIs for all years to the annual blood examination rate of 1965 for each country. The standardized APIs calculated for Brazil, Peru, Guyana, and for...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
1997
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2627649/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9284373 |
_version_ | 1782163564216188928 |
---|---|
author | Roberts, D R Laughlin, L L Hsheih, P Legters, L J |
author_facet | Roberts, D R Laughlin, L L Hsheih, P Legters, L J |
author_sort | Roberts, D R |
collection | PubMed |
description | Malaria is reemerging in endemic-disease countries of South America. We examined the rate of real growth in annual parasite indexes (API) by adjusting APIs for all years to the annual blood examination rate of 1965 for each country. The standardized APIs calculated for Brazil, Peru, Guyana, and for 18 other malaria-endemic countries of the Americas presented a consistent pattern of low rates up through the late 1970s, followed by geometric growth in malaria incidence in subsequent years. True growth in malaria incidence corresponds temporally with changes in global strategies for malaria control. Underlying the concordance of these events is a causal link between decreased spraying of homes with DDT and increased malaria; two regression models defining this link showed statistically significant negative relationships between APIs and house-spray rates. Separate analyses of data from 1993 to 1995 showed that countries that have recently discontinued their spray programs are reporting large increases in malaria incidence. Ecuador, which has increased use of DDT since 1993, is the only country reporting a large reduction (61%) in malaria rates since 1993. DDT use for malaria control and application of the Global Malaria Control Strategy to the Americas should be subjects of urgent national and international debate. We discuss the recent actions to ban DDT, the health costs of such a ban, perspectives on DDT use in agriculture versus malaria control, and costs versus benefits of DDT and alternative insecticides. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2627649 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1997 |
publisher | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26276492009-05-20 DDT, global strategies, and a malaria control crisis in South America. Roberts, D R Laughlin, L L Hsheih, P Legters, L J Emerg Infect Dis Research Article Malaria is reemerging in endemic-disease countries of South America. We examined the rate of real growth in annual parasite indexes (API) by adjusting APIs for all years to the annual blood examination rate of 1965 for each country. The standardized APIs calculated for Brazil, Peru, Guyana, and for 18 other malaria-endemic countries of the Americas presented a consistent pattern of low rates up through the late 1970s, followed by geometric growth in malaria incidence in subsequent years. True growth in malaria incidence corresponds temporally with changes in global strategies for malaria control. Underlying the concordance of these events is a causal link between decreased spraying of homes with DDT and increased malaria; two regression models defining this link showed statistically significant negative relationships between APIs and house-spray rates. Separate analyses of data from 1993 to 1995 showed that countries that have recently discontinued their spray programs are reporting large increases in malaria incidence. Ecuador, which has increased use of DDT since 1993, is the only country reporting a large reduction (61%) in malaria rates since 1993. DDT use for malaria control and application of the Global Malaria Control Strategy to the Americas should be subjects of urgent national and international debate. We discuss the recent actions to ban DDT, the health costs of such a ban, perspectives on DDT use in agriculture versus malaria control, and costs versus benefits of DDT and alternative insecticides. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1997 /pmc/articles/PMC2627649/ /pubmed/9284373 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Roberts, D R Laughlin, L L Hsheih, P Legters, L J DDT, global strategies, and a malaria control crisis in South America. |
title | DDT, global strategies, and a malaria control crisis in South America. |
title_full | DDT, global strategies, and a malaria control crisis in South America. |
title_fullStr | DDT, global strategies, and a malaria control crisis in South America. |
title_full_unstemmed | DDT, global strategies, and a malaria control crisis in South America. |
title_short | DDT, global strategies, and a malaria control crisis in South America. |
title_sort | ddt, global strategies, and a malaria control crisis in south america. |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2627649/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9284373 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT robertsdr ddtglobalstrategiesandamalariacontrolcrisisinsouthamerica AT laughlinll ddtglobalstrategiesandamalariacontrolcrisisinsouthamerica AT hsheihp ddtglobalstrategiesandamalariacontrolcrisisinsouthamerica AT legterslj ddtglobalstrategiesandamalariacontrolcrisisinsouthamerica |