Cargando…
In-reach specialist nursing teams for residential care homes: uptake of services, impact on care provision and cost-effectiveness
BACKGROUND: A joint NHS-Local Authority initiative in England designed to provide a dedicated nursing and physiotherapy in-reach team (IRT) to four residential care homes has been evaluated. The IRT supported 131 residents and maintained 15 'virtual' beds for specialist nursing in these ca...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2627849/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19102743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-269 |
_version_ | 1782163603000918016 |
---|---|
author | Szczepura, Ala Nelson, Sara Wild, Deidre |
author_facet | Szczepura, Ala Nelson, Sara Wild, Deidre |
author_sort | Szczepura, Ala |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A joint NHS-Local Authority initiative in England designed to provide a dedicated nursing and physiotherapy in-reach team (IRT) to four residential care homes has been evaluated. The IRT supported 131 residents and maintained 15 'virtual' beds for specialist nursing in these care homes. METHODS: Data captured prospectively (July 2005 to June 2007) included: numbers of referrals; reason for referral; outcome (e.g. admission to IRT bed, short-term IRT support); length of stay in IRT; prevented hospital admissions; early hospital discharges; avoided nursing home transfers; and detection of unrecognised illnesses. An economic analysis was undertaken. RESULTS: 733 referrals were made during the 2 years (range 0.5 to 13.0 per resident per annum) resulting in a total of 6,528 visits. Two thirds of referrals aimed at maintaining the resident's independence in the care home. According to expert panel assessment, 197 hospital admissions were averted over the period; 20 early discharges facilitated; and 28 resident transfers to a nursing home prevented. Detection of previously unrecognised illnesses accounted for a high number of visits. Investment in IRT equalled £44.38 per resident per week. Savings through reduced hospital admissions, early discharges, delayed transfers to nursing homes, and identification of previously unrecognised illnesses are conservatively estimated to produce a final reduction in care cost of £6.33 per resident per week. A sensitivity analysis indicates this figure might range from a weekly overall saving of £36.90 per resident to a 'worst case' estimate of £2.70 extra expenditure per resident per week. Evaluation early in implementation may underestimate some cost-saving activities and greater savings may emerge over a longer time period. Similarly, IRT costs may reduce over time due to the potential for refinement of team without major loss in effectiveness. CONCLUSION: Introduction of a specialist nursing in-reach team for residential homes is at least cost neutral and, in all probability, cost saving. Further benefits include development of new skills in the care home workforce and enhanced quality of care. Residents are enabled to stay in familiar surroundings rather than unnecessarily spending time in hospital or being transferred to a higher dependency nursing home setting. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2627849 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26278492009-01-17 In-reach specialist nursing teams for residential care homes: uptake of services, impact on care provision and cost-effectiveness Szczepura, Ala Nelson, Sara Wild, Deidre BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: A joint NHS-Local Authority initiative in England designed to provide a dedicated nursing and physiotherapy in-reach team (IRT) to four residential care homes has been evaluated. The IRT supported 131 residents and maintained 15 'virtual' beds for specialist nursing in these care homes. METHODS: Data captured prospectively (July 2005 to June 2007) included: numbers of referrals; reason for referral; outcome (e.g. admission to IRT bed, short-term IRT support); length of stay in IRT; prevented hospital admissions; early hospital discharges; avoided nursing home transfers; and detection of unrecognised illnesses. An economic analysis was undertaken. RESULTS: 733 referrals were made during the 2 years (range 0.5 to 13.0 per resident per annum) resulting in a total of 6,528 visits. Two thirds of referrals aimed at maintaining the resident's independence in the care home. According to expert panel assessment, 197 hospital admissions were averted over the period; 20 early discharges facilitated; and 28 resident transfers to a nursing home prevented. Detection of previously unrecognised illnesses accounted for a high number of visits. Investment in IRT equalled £44.38 per resident per week. Savings through reduced hospital admissions, early discharges, delayed transfers to nursing homes, and identification of previously unrecognised illnesses are conservatively estimated to produce a final reduction in care cost of £6.33 per resident per week. A sensitivity analysis indicates this figure might range from a weekly overall saving of £36.90 per resident to a 'worst case' estimate of £2.70 extra expenditure per resident per week. Evaluation early in implementation may underestimate some cost-saving activities and greater savings may emerge over a longer time period. Similarly, IRT costs may reduce over time due to the potential for refinement of team without major loss in effectiveness. CONCLUSION: Introduction of a specialist nursing in-reach team for residential homes is at least cost neutral and, in all probability, cost saving. Further benefits include development of new skills in the care home workforce and enhanced quality of care. Residents are enabled to stay in familiar surroundings rather than unnecessarily spending time in hospital or being transferred to a higher dependency nursing home setting. BioMed Central 2008-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC2627849/ /pubmed/19102743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-269 Text en Copyright © 2008 Szczepura et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Szczepura, Ala Nelson, Sara Wild, Deidre In-reach specialist nursing teams for residential care homes: uptake of services, impact on care provision and cost-effectiveness |
title | In-reach specialist nursing teams for residential care homes: uptake of services, impact on care provision and cost-effectiveness |
title_full | In-reach specialist nursing teams for residential care homes: uptake of services, impact on care provision and cost-effectiveness |
title_fullStr | In-reach specialist nursing teams for residential care homes: uptake of services, impact on care provision and cost-effectiveness |
title_full_unstemmed | In-reach specialist nursing teams for residential care homes: uptake of services, impact on care provision and cost-effectiveness |
title_short | In-reach specialist nursing teams for residential care homes: uptake of services, impact on care provision and cost-effectiveness |
title_sort | in-reach specialist nursing teams for residential care homes: uptake of services, impact on care provision and cost-effectiveness |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2627849/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19102743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-269 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT szczepuraala inreachspecialistnursingteamsforresidentialcarehomesuptakeofservicesimpactoncareprovisionandcosteffectiveness AT nelsonsara inreachspecialistnursingteamsforresidentialcarehomesuptakeofservicesimpactoncareprovisionandcosteffectiveness AT wilddeidre inreachspecialistnursingteamsforresidentialcarehomesuptakeofservicesimpactoncareprovisionandcosteffectiveness |