Cargando…
A Retrospective Performance Assessment of the Developmental Neurotoxicity Study in Support of OECD Test Guideline 426
OBJECTIVE: We conducted a review of the history and performance of developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) testing in support of the finalization and implementation of Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) DNT test guideline 426 (TG 426). INFORMATION SOURCES AND ANALYSIS: In this re...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2627860/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19165382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.11447 |
_version_ | 1782163605650669568 |
---|---|
author | Makris, Susan L. Raffaele, Kathleen Allen, Sandra Bowers, Wayne J. Hass, Ulla Alleva, Enrico Calamandrei, Gemma Sheets, Larry Amcoff, Patric Delrue, Nathalie Crofton, Kevin M. |
author_facet | Makris, Susan L. Raffaele, Kathleen Allen, Sandra Bowers, Wayne J. Hass, Ulla Alleva, Enrico Calamandrei, Gemma Sheets, Larry Amcoff, Patric Delrue, Nathalie Crofton, Kevin M. |
author_sort | Makris, Susan L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: We conducted a review of the history and performance of developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) testing in support of the finalization and implementation of Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) DNT test guideline 426 (TG 426). INFORMATION SOURCES AND ANALYSIS: In this review we summarize extensive scientific efforts that form the foundation for this testing paradigm, including basic neurotoxicology research, interlaboratory collaborative studies, expert workshops, and validation studies, and we address the relevance, applicability, and use of the DNT study in risk assessment. CONCLUSIONS: The OECD DNT guideline represents the best available science for assessing the potential for DNT in human health risk assessment, and data generated with this protocol are relevant and reliable for the assessment of these end points. The test methods used have been subjected to an extensive history of international validation, peer review, and evaluation, which is contained in the public record. The reproducibility, reliability, and sensitivity of these methods have been demonstrated, using a wide variety of test substances, in accordance with OECD guidance on the validation and international acceptance of new or updated test methods for hazard characterization. Multiple independent, expert scientific peer reviews affirm these conclusions. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2627860 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26278602009-01-22 A Retrospective Performance Assessment of the Developmental Neurotoxicity Study in Support of OECD Test Guideline 426 Makris, Susan L. Raffaele, Kathleen Allen, Sandra Bowers, Wayne J. Hass, Ulla Alleva, Enrico Calamandrei, Gemma Sheets, Larry Amcoff, Patric Delrue, Nathalie Crofton, Kevin M. Environ Health Perspect Review OBJECTIVE: We conducted a review of the history and performance of developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) testing in support of the finalization and implementation of Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) DNT test guideline 426 (TG 426). INFORMATION SOURCES AND ANALYSIS: In this review we summarize extensive scientific efforts that form the foundation for this testing paradigm, including basic neurotoxicology research, interlaboratory collaborative studies, expert workshops, and validation studies, and we address the relevance, applicability, and use of the DNT study in risk assessment. CONCLUSIONS: The OECD DNT guideline represents the best available science for assessing the potential for DNT in human health risk assessment, and data generated with this protocol are relevant and reliable for the assessment of these end points. The test methods used have been subjected to an extensive history of international validation, peer review, and evaluation, which is contained in the public record. The reproducibility, reliability, and sensitivity of these methods have been demonstrated, using a wide variety of test substances, in accordance with OECD guidance on the validation and international acceptance of new or updated test methods for hazard characterization. Multiple independent, expert scientific peer reviews affirm these conclusions. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2009-01 2008-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC2627860/ /pubmed/19165382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.11447 Text en http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ Publication of EHP lies in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from EHP may be reprinted freely. Use of materials published in EHP should be acknowledged (for example, ?Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives?); pertinent reference information should be provided for the article from which the material was reproduced. Articles from EHP, especially the News section, may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright. |
spellingShingle | Review Makris, Susan L. Raffaele, Kathleen Allen, Sandra Bowers, Wayne J. Hass, Ulla Alleva, Enrico Calamandrei, Gemma Sheets, Larry Amcoff, Patric Delrue, Nathalie Crofton, Kevin M. A Retrospective Performance Assessment of the Developmental Neurotoxicity Study in Support of OECD Test Guideline 426 |
title | A Retrospective Performance Assessment of the Developmental Neurotoxicity Study in Support of OECD Test Guideline 426 |
title_full | A Retrospective Performance Assessment of the Developmental Neurotoxicity Study in Support of OECD Test Guideline 426 |
title_fullStr | A Retrospective Performance Assessment of the Developmental Neurotoxicity Study in Support of OECD Test Guideline 426 |
title_full_unstemmed | A Retrospective Performance Assessment of the Developmental Neurotoxicity Study in Support of OECD Test Guideline 426 |
title_short | A Retrospective Performance Assessment of the Developmental Neurotoxicity Study in Support of OECD Test Guideline 426 |
title_sort | retrospective performance assessment of the developmental neurotoxicity study in support of oecd test guideline 426 |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2627860/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19165382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.11447 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT makrissusanl aretrospectiveperformanceassessmentofthedevelopmentalneurotoxicitystudyinsupportofoecdtestguideline426 AT raffaelekathleen aretrospectiveperformanceassessmentofthedevelopmentalneurotoxicitystudyinsupportofoecdtestguideline426 AT allensandra aretrospectiveperformanceassessmentofthedevelopmentalneurotoxicitystudyinsupportofoecdtestguideline426 AT bowerswaynej aretrospectiveperformanceassessmentofthedevelopmentalneurotoxicitystudyinsupportofoecdtestguideline426 AT hassulla aretrospectiveperformanceassessmentofthedevelopmentalneurotoxicitystudyinsupportofoecdtestguideline426 AT allevaenrico aretrospectiveperformanceassessmentofthedevelopmentalneurotoxicitystudyinsupportofoecdtestguideline426 AT calamandreigemma aretrospectiveperformanceassessmentofthedevelopmentalneurotoxicitystudyinsupportofoecdtestguideline426 AT sheetslarry aretrospectiveperformanceassessmentofthedevelopmentalneurotoxicitystudyinsupportofoecdtestguideline426 AT amcoffpatric aretrospectiveperformanceassessmentofthedevelopmentalneurotoxicitystudyinsupportofoecdtestguideline426 AT delruenathalie aretrospectiveperformanceassessmentofthedevelopmentalneurotoxicitystudyinsupportofoecdtestguideline426 AT croftonkevinm aretrospectiveperformanceassessmentofthedevelopmentalneurotoxicitystudyinsupportofoecdtestguideline426 AT makrissusanl retrospectiveperformanceassessmentofthedevelopmentalneurotoxicitystudyinsupportofoecdtestguideline426 AT raffaelekathleen retrospectiveperformanceassessmentofthedevelopmentalneurotoxicitystudyinsupportofoecdtestguideline426 AT allensandra retrospectiveperformanceassessmentofthedevelopmentalneurotoxicitystudyinsupportofoecdtestguideline426 AT bowerswaynej retrospectiveperformanceassessmentofthedevelopmentalneurotoxicitystudyinsupportofoecdtestguideline426 AT hassulla retrospectiveperformanceassessmentofthedevelopmentalneurotoxicitystudyinsupportofoecdtestguideline426 AT allevaenrico retrospectiveperformanceassessmentofthedevelopmentalneurotoxicitystudyinsupportofoecdtestguideline426 AT calamandreigemma retrospectiveperformanceassessmentofthedevelopmentalneurotoxicitystudyinsupportofoecdtestguideline426 AT sheetslarry retrospectiveperformanceassessmentofthedevelopmentalneurotoxicitystudyinsupportofoecdtestguideline426 AT amcoffpatric retrospectiveperformanceassessmentofthedevelopmentalneurotoxicitystudyinsupportofoecdtestguideline426 AT delruenathalie retrospectiveperformanceassessmentofthedevelopmentalneurotoxicitystudyinsupportofoecdtestguideline426 AT croftonkevinm retrospectiveperformanceassessmentofthedevelopmentalneurotoxicitystudyinsupportofoecdtestguideline426 |