Cargando…

Robotic Surgery for Cervical Cancer

The development of robotic technology has facilitated the application of minimally invasive techniques for the treatment and evaluation of patients with early, advanced, and recurrent cervical cancer. The application of robotic technology for selected patients with cervical cancer and the data avail...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Magrina, Javier F., Zanagnolo, Vanna L.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2628040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19108008
http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2008.49.6.879
_version_ 1782163647950225408
author Magrina, Javier F.
Zanagnolo, Vanna L.
author_facet Magrina, Javier F.
Zanagnolo, Vanna L.
author_sort Magrina, Javier F.
collection PubMed
description The development of robotic technology has facilitated the application of minimally invasive techniques for the treatment and evaluation of patients with early, advanced, and recurrent cervical cancer. The application of robotic technology for selected patients with cervical cancer and the data available in the literature are addressed in the present review paper. The robotic radical hysterectomy technique developed at the Mayo Clinic Arizona is presented with data comparing 27 patients who underwent the robotic procedure with 2 matched groups of patients treated by laparoscopic (N = 31), and laparotomic radical hysterectomy (N = 35). A few other studies confirmed the feasibility and safety of robotic radical hysterectomy and comparisons to either to the laparoscopic or open approach were discussed. Based on data from the literature, minimally invasive techniques including laparoscopy and robotics are preferable to laparotomy for patients requiring radical hysterectomy, with some advantages noted for robotics over laparoscopy. A prospective randomised trial is currently being perfomred under the auspices of the American Association of Gyneoclogic Laparoscopists comparing minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (laparoscopy or robotics) with laparotomy. For early cervical cancer radical parametrectomy and fertility preserving trachelectomy have been performed using robotic technology and been shown to be feasible, safe, and easier to perform when compared to the laparoscopic approach. Similar benefits have been noted in the treatment of advanced and recurrent cervical cancer where complex procedures such as extraperitoneal paraortic lymphadenectomy and pelvic exenteration have been required. Conclusion: Robotic technology better facilitates the surgical approach as compared to laparoscopy for technically challenging operations performed to treat primary, early or advanced, and recurrent cervical cancer. Although patient advantages are similar or slightly improved with robotics, there are multiple advantages for surgeons.
format Text
id pubmed-2628040
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Yonsei University College of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26280402009-02-02 Robotic Surgery for Cervical Cancer Magrina, Javier F. Zanagnolo, Vanna L. Yonsei Med J Review Article The development of robotic technology has facilitated the application of minimally invasive techniques for the treatment and evaluation of patients with early, advanced, and recurrent cervical cancer. The application of robotic technology for selected patients with cervical cancer and the data available in the literature are addressed in the present review paper. The robotic radical hysterectomy technique developed at the Mayo Clinic Arizona is presented with data comparing 27 patients who underwent the robotic procedure with 2 matched groups of patients treated by laparoscopic (N = 31), and laparotomic radical hysterectomy (N = 35). A few other studies confirmed the feasibility and safety of robotic radical hysterectomy and comparisons to either to the laparoscopic or open approach were discussed. Based on data from the literature, minimally invasive techniques including laparoscopy and robotics are preferable to laparotomy for patients requiring radical hysterectomy, with some advantages noted for robotics over laparoscopy. A prospective randomised trial is currently being perfomred under the auspices of the American Association of Gyneoclogic Laparoscopists comparing minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (laparoscopy or robotics) with laparotomy. For early cervical cancer radical parametrectomy and fertility preserving trachelectomy have been performed using robotic technology and been shown to be feasible, safe, and easier to perform when compared to the laparoscopic approach. Similar benefits have been noted in the treatment of advanced and recurrent cervical cancer where complex procedures such as extraperitoneal paraortic lymphadenectomy and pelvic exenteration have been required. Conclusion: Robotic technology better facilitates the surgical approach as compared to laparoscopy for technically challenging operations performed to treat primary, early or advanced, and recurrent cervical cancer. Although patient advantages are similar or slightly improved with robotics, there are multiple advantages for surgeons. Yonsei University College of Medicine 2008-12-31 2008-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC2628040/ /pubmed/19108008 http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2008.49.6.879 Text en Copyright © 2008 The Yonsei University College of Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Magrina, Javier F.
Zanagnolo, Vanna L.
Robotic Surgery for Cervical Cancer
title Robotic Surgery for Cervical Cancer
title_full Robotic Surgery for Cervical Cancer
title_fullStr Robotic Surgery for Cervical Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Robotic Surgery for Cervical Cancer
title_short Robotic Surgery for Cervical Cancer
title_sort robotic surgery for cervical cancer
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2628040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19108008
http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2008.49.6.879
work_keys_str_mv AT magrinajavierf roboticsurgeryforcervicalcancer
AT zanagnolovannal roboticsurgeryforcervicalcancer