Cargando…

Comparing hospital and telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: randomised equivalence trial

Objective To compare traditional hospital follow-up with telephone follow-up by specialist nurses after treatment for breast cancer. Design A two centre randomised equivalence trial in which women remained in the study for a mean of 24 months. Setting Outpatient clinics in two NHS hospital trusts in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beaver, Kinta, Tysver-Robinson, Debbie, Campbell, Malcolm, Twomey, Mary, Williamson, Susan, Hindley, Andrew, Susnerwala, Shabbir, Dunn, Graham, Luker, Karen
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2628299/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19147478
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a3147
_version_ 1782163683219079168
author Beaver, Kinta
Tysver-Robinson, Debbie
Campbell, Malcolm
Twomey, Mary
Williamson, Susan
Hindley, Andrew
Susnerwala, Shabbir
Dunn, Graham
Luker, Karen
author_facet Beaver, Kinta
Tysver-Robinson, Debbie
Campbell, Malcolm
Twomey, Mary
Williamson, Susan
Hindley, Andrew
Susnerwala, Shabbir
Dunn, Graham
Luker, Karen
author_sort Beaver, Kinta
collection PubMed
description Objective To compare traditional hospital follow-up with telephone follow-up by specialist nurses after treatment for breast cancer. Design A two centre randomised equivalence trial in which women remained in the study for a mean of 24 months. Setting Outpatient clinics in two NHS hospital trusts in the north west of England Participants 374 women treated for breast cancer who were at low to moderate risk of recurrence. Interventions Participants were randomised to traditional hospital follow-up (consultation, clinical examination, and mammography as per hospital policy) or telephone follow-up by specialist nurses (consultation with structured intervention and mammography according to hospital policy). Main outcome measures Psychological morbidity (state-trait anxiety inventory, general health questionnaire (GHQ-12)), participants’ needs for information, participants’ satisfaction, clinical investigations ordered, and time to detection of recurrent disease. Results The 95% confidence interval for difference in mean state-trait scores adjusted for treatment received (−3.33 to 2.07) was within the predefined equivalence region (−3.5 to 3.5). The women in the telephone group were no more anxious as a result of foregoing clinic examinations and face-to-face consultations and reported higher levels of satisfaction than those attending hospital clinics (intention to treat P<0.001). The numbers of clinical investigations ordered did not differ between groups. Recurrences were few (4.5%), with no differences between groups for time to detection (median 60.5 (range 37-131) days in hospital group v 39.0 (10-152) days in telephone group; P=0.228). Conclusions Telephone follow-up was well received by participants, with no physical or psychological disadvantage. It is suitable for women at low to moderate risk of recurrence and those with long travelling distances or mobility problems and decreases the burden on busy hospital clinics. Trial registration National Cancer Research Institute 1477.
format Text
id pubmed-2628299
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26282992009-01-29 Comparing hospital and telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: randomised equivalence trial Beaver, Kinta Tysver-Robinson, Debbie Campbell, Malcolm Twomey, Mary Williamson, Susan Hindley, Andrew Susnerwala, Shabbir Dunn, Graham Luker, Karen BMJ Research Objective To compare traditional hospital follow-up with telephone follow-up by specialist nurses after treatment for breast cancer. Design A two centre randomised equivalence trial in which women remained in the study for a mean of 24 months. Setting Outpatient clinics in two NHS hospital trusts in the north west of England Participants 374 women treated for breast cancer who were at low to moderate risk of recurrence. Interventions Participants were randomised to traditional hospital follow-up (consultation, clinical examination, and mammography as per hospital policy) or telephone follow-up by specialist nurses (consultation with structured intervention and mammography according to hospital policy). Main outcome measures Psychological morbidity (state-trait anxiety inventory, general health questionnaire (GHQ-12)), participants’ needs for information, participants’ satisfaction, clinical investigations ordered, and time to detection of recurrent disease. Results The 95% confidence interval for difference in mean state-trait scores adjusted for treatment received (−3.33 to 2.07) was within the predefined equivalence region (−3.5 to 3.5). The women in the telephone group were no more anxious as a result of foregoing clinic examinations and face-to-face consultations and reported higher levels of satisfaction than those attending hospital clinics (intention to treat P<0.001). The numbers of clinical investigations ordered did not differ between groups. Recurrences were few (4.5%), with no differences between groups for time to detection (median 60.5 (range 37-131) days in hospital group v 39.0 (10-152) days in telephone group; P=0.228). Conclusions Telephone follow-up was well received by participants, with no physical or psychological disadvantage. It is suitable for women at low to moderate risk of recurrence and those with long travelling distances or mobility problems and decreases the burden on busy hospital clinics. Trial registration National Cancer Research Institute 1477. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2009-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC2628299/ /pubmed/19147478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a3147 Text en © Beaver et al 2009 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Beaver, Kinta
Tysver-Robinson, Debbie
Campbell, Malcolm
Twomey, Mary
Williamson, Susan
Hindley, Andrew
Susnerwala, Shabbir
Dunn, Graham
Luker, Karen
Comparing hospital and telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: randomised equivalence trial
title Comparing hospital and telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: randomised equivalence trial
title_full Comparing hospital and telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: randomised equivalence trial
title_fullStr Comparing hospital and telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: randomised equivalence trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparing hospital and telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: randomised equivalence trial
title_short Comparing hospital and telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: randomised equivalence trial
title_sort comparing hospital and telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: randomised equivalence trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2628299/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19147478
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a3147
work_keys_str_mv AT beaverkinta comparinghospitalandtelephonefollowupaftertreatmentforbreastcancerrandomisedequivalencetrial
AT tysverrobinsondebbie comparinghospitalandtelephonefollowupaftertreatmentforbreastcancerrandomisedequivalencetrial
AT campbellmalcolm comparinghospitalandtelephonefollowupaftertreatmentforbreastcancerrandomisedequivalencetrial
AT twomeymary comparinghospitalandtelephonefollowupaftertreatmentforbreastcancerrandomisedequivalencetrial
AT williamsonsusan comparinghospitalandtelephonefollowupaftertreatmentforbreastcancerrandomisedequivalencetrial
AT hindleyandrew comparinghospitalandtelephonefollowupaftertreatmentforbreastcancerrandomisedequivalencetrial
AT susnerwalashabbir comparinghospitalandtelephonefollowupaftertreatmentforbreastcancerrandomisedequivalencetrial
AT dunngraham comparinghospitalandtelephonefollowupaftertreatmentforbreastcancerrandomisedequivalencetrial
AT lukerkaren comparinghospitalandtelephonefollowupaftertreatmentforbreastcancerrandomisedequivalencetrial