Cargando…
Comparing hospital and telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: randomised equivalence trial
Objective To compare traditional hospital follow-up with telephone follow-up by specialist nurses after treatment for breast cancer. Design A two centre randomised equivalence trial in which women remained in the study for a mean of 24 months. Setting Outpatient clinics in two NHS hospital trusts in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2628299/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19147478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a3147 |
_version_ | 1782163683219079168 |
---|---|
author | Beaver, Kinta Tysver-Robinson, Debbie Campbell, Malcolm Twomey, Mary Williamson, Susan Hindley, Andrew Susnerwala, Shabbir Dunn, Graham Luker, Karen |
author_facet | Beaver, Kinta Tysver-Robinson, Debbie Campbell, Malcolm Twomey, Mary Williamson, Susan Hindley, Andrew Susnerwala, Shabbir Dunn, Graham Luker, Karen |
author_sort | Beaver, Kinta |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective To compare traditional hospital follow-up with telephone follow-up by specialist nurses after treatment for breast cancer. Design A two centre randomised equivalence trial in which women remained in the study for a mean of 24 months. Setting Outpatient clinics in two NHS hospital trusts in the north west of England Participants 374 women treated for breast cancer who were at low to moderate risk of recurrence. Interventions Participants were randomised to traditional hospital follow-up (consultation, clinical examination, and mammography as per hospital policy) or telephone follow-up by specialist nurses (consultation with structured intervention and mammography according to hospital policy). Main outcome measures Psychological morbidity (state-trait anxiety inventory, general health questionnaire (GHQ-12)), participants’ needs for information, participants’ satisfaction, clinical investigations ordered, and time to detection of recurrent disease. Results The 95% confidence interval for difference in mean state-trait scores adjusted for treatment received (−3.33 to 2.07) was within the predefined equivalence region (−3.5 to 3.5). The women in the telephone group were no more anxious as a result of foregoing clinic examinations and face-to-face consultations and reported higher levels of satisfaction than those attending hospital clinics (intention to treat P<0.001). The numbers of clinical investigations ordered did not differ between groups. Recurrences were few (4.5%), with no differences between groups for time to detection (median 60.5 (range 37-131) days in hospital group v 39.0 (10-152) days in telephone group; P=0.228). Conclusions Telephone follow-up was well received by participants, with no physical or psychological disadvantage. It is suitable for women at low to moderate risk of recurrence and those with long travelling distances or mobility problems and decreases the burden on busy hospital clinics. Trial registration National Cancer Research Institute 1477. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2628299 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26282992009-01-29 Comparing hospital and telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: randomised equivalence trial Beaver, Kinta Tysver-Robinson, Debbie Campbell, Malcolm Twomey, Mary Williamson, Susan Hindley, Andrew Susnerwala, Shabbir Dunn, Graham Luker, Karen BMJ Research Objective To compare traditional hospital follow-up with telephone follow-up by specialist nurses after treatment for breast cancer. Design A two centre randomised equivalence trial in which women remained in the study for a mean of 24 months. Setting Outpatient clinics in two NHS hospital trusts in the north west of England Participants 374 women treated for breast cancer who were at low to moderate risk of recurrence. Interventions Participants were randomised to traditional hospital follow-up (consultation, clinical examination, and mammography as per hospital policy) or telephone follow-up by specialist nurses (consultation with structured intervention and mammography according to hospital policy). Main outcome measures Psychological morbidity (state-trait anxiety inventory, general health questionnaire (GHQ-12)), participants’ needs for information, participants’ satisfaction, clinical investigations ordered, and time to detection of recurrent disease. Results The 95% confidence interval for difference in mean state-trait scores adjusted for treatment received (−3.33 to 2.07) was within the predefined equivalence region (−3.5 to 3.5). The women in the telephone group were no more anxious as a result of foregoing clinic examinations and face-to-face consultations and reported higher levels of satisfaction than those attending hospital clinics (intention to treat P<0.001). The numbers of clinical investigations ordered did not differ between groups. Recurrences were few (4.5%), with no differences between groups for time to detection (median 60.5 (range 37-131) days in hospital group v 39.0 (10-152) days in telephone group; P=0.228). Conclusions Telephone follow-up was well received by participants, with no physical or psychological disadvantage. It is suitable for women at low to moderate risk of recurrence and those with long travelling distances or mobility problems and decreases the burden on busy hospital clinics. Trial registration National Cancer Research Institute 1477. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2009-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC2628299/ /pubmed/19147478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a3147 Text en © Beaver et al 2009 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Beaver, Kinta Tysver-Robinson, Debbie Campbell, Malcolm Twomey, Mary Williamson, Susan Hindley, Andrew Susnerwala, Shabbir Dunn, Graham Luker, Karen Comparing hospital and telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: randomised equivalence trial |
title | Comparing hospital and telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: randomised equivalence trial |
title_full | Comparing hospital and telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: randomised equivalence trial |
title_fullStr | Comparing hospital and telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: randomised equivalence trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing hospital and telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: randomised equivalence trial |
title_short | Comparing hospital and telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: randomised equivalence trial |
title_sort | comparing hospital and telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: randomised equivalence trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2628299/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19147478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a3147 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beaverkinta comparinghospitalandtelephonefollowupaftertreatmentforbreastcancerrandomisedequivalencetrial AT tysverrobinsondebbie comparinghospitalandtelephonefollowupaftertreatmentforbreastcancerrandomisedequivalencetrial AT campbellmalcolm comparinghospitalandtelephonefollowupaftertreatmentforbreastcancerrandomisedequivalencetrial AT twomeymary comparinghospitalandtelephonefollowupaftertreatmentforbreastcancerrandomisedequivalencetrial AT williamsonsusan comparinghospitalandtelephonefollowupaftertreatmentforbreastcancerrandomisedequivalencetrial AT hindleyandrew comparinghospitalandtelephonefollowupaftertreatmentforbreastcancerrandomisedequivalencetrial AT susnerwalashabbir comparinghospitalandtelephonefollowupaftertreatmentforbreastcancerrandomisedequivalencetrial AT dunngraham comparinghospitalandtelephonefollowupaftertreatmentforbreastcancerrandomisedequivalencetrial AT lukerkaren comparinghospitalandtelephonefollowupaftertreatmentforbreastcancerrandomisedequivalencetrial |