Cargando…
Reporting and interpretation of SF-36 outcomes in randomised trials: systematic review
Objective To determine how often health surveys and quality of life evaluations reach different conclusions from those of primary efficacy outcomes and whether discordant results make a difference in the interpretation of trial findings. Design Systematic review. Data sources PubMed, contact with au...
Autores principales: | Contopoulos-Ioannidis, Despina G, Karvouni, Anastasia, Kouri, Ioanna, Ioannidis, John P A |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2628302/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19139138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a3006 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Comparative effect sizes in randomised trials from less developed and more developed countries: meta-epidemiological assessment
por: Panagiotou, Orestis A, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Prepandemic cross-reactive humoral immunity to SARS-CoV-2 in Africa: Systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Ioannidis, John P.A., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
International ranking systems for universities and institutions: a critical appraisal
por: Ioannidis, John PA, et al.
Publicado: (2007) -
Agreement of treatment effects for mortality from routinely collected data and subsequent randomized trials: meta-epidemiological survey
por: Hemkens, Lars G, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Population-level COVID-19 mortality risk for non-elderly individuals overall and for non-elderly individuals without underlying diseases in pandemic epicenters
por: Ioannidis, John P.A., et al.
Publicado: (2020)