Cargando…

Penetrating eyelid injury: a case report and review of literature

INTRODUCTION: In literature, many different types of foreign objects have been found to have caused eye injuries. These objects can range from organic to inorganic matter such as glass, wood, pencil, nails and fishhooks. Once the injury is recognized, removal of the foreign body and technique used i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wasfi, Ehab, Kendrick, B, Yasen, T, Varma, Priya, Abd-Elsayed, Alaa A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2629464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19144194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-5-2
_version_ 1782163780913856512
author Wasfi, Ehab
Kendrick, B
Yasen, T
Varma, Priya
Abd-Elsayed, Alaa A
author_facet Wasfi, Ehab
Kendrick, B
Yasen, T
Varma, Priya
Abd-Elsayed, Alaa A
author_sort Wasfi, Ehab
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In literature, many different types of foreign objects have been found to have caused eye injuries. These objects can range from organic to inorganic matter such as glass, wood, pencil, nails and fishhooks. Once the injury is recognized, removal of the foreign body and technique used in the management of the injury is very important to reduce further ocular damage. This case report investigates an injury caused by an object similar to a fishhook that pierced into the eyelid in the opposite direction to normal. CASE PRESENTATION: A 19 year old man presented with a one hour history of the right upper eyelid injury from a wire fence. The loose end of the wire penetrated the full thickness of the eyelid in the direction opposite to the normal. The wire passed from under the eyelid, through the centre of the upper lid, to the external surface. After the application of topical anesthetic drops, the eye could be opened manually, the lid averted, and the wire passed out through the defect. No complications were observed. Post removal, the acuity increased to 6/9 and there was no intraocular penetration. Full recovery was observed as well. CONCLUSION: A severe eyelid penetrating injury can be uncomplicated with a full recovery when there is no intraocular penetration. It is also possible to have an injury pass under the lower margin of the lid and penetrate from inside to out, with no associated corneal injury.
format Text
id pubmed-2629464
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26294642009-01-22 Penetrating eyelid injury: a case report and review of literature Wasfi, Ehab Kendrick, B Yasen, T Varma, Priya Abd-Elsayed, Alaa A Head Face Med Case Report INTRODUCTION: In literature, many different types of foreign objects have been found to have caused eye injuries. These objects can range from organic to inorganic matter such as glass, wood, pencil, nails and fishhooks. Once the injury is recognized, removal of the foreign body and technique used in the management of the injury is very important to reduce further ocular damage. This case report investigates an injury caused by an object similar to a fishhook that pierced into the eyelid in the opposite direction to normal. CASE PRESENTATION: A 19 year old man presented with a one hour history of the right upper eyelid injury from a wire fence. The loose end of the wire penetrated the full thickness of the eyelid in the direction opposite to the normal. The wire passed from under the eyelid, through the centre of the upper lid, to the external surface. After the application of topical anesthetic drops, the eye could be opened manually, the lid averted, and the wire passed out through the defect. No complications were observed. Post removal, the acuity increased to 6/9 and there was no intraocular penetration. Full recovery was observed as well. CONCLUSION: A severe eyelid penetrating injury can be uncomplicated with a full recovery when there is no intraocular penetration. It is also possible to have an injury pass under the lower margin of the lid and penetrate from inside to out, with no associated corneal injury. BioMed Central 2009-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC2629464/ /pubmed/19144194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-5-2 Text en Copyright © 2009 Wasfi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Case Report
Wasfi, Ehab
Kendrick, B
Yasen, T
Varma, Priya
Abd-Elsayed, Alaa A
Penetrating eyelid injury: a case report and review of literature
title Penetrating eyelid injury: a case report and review of literature
title_full Penetrating eyelid injury: a case report and review of literature
title_fullStr Penetrating eyelid injury: a case report and review of literature
title_full_unstemmed Penetrating eyelid injury: a case report and review of literature
title_short Penetrating eyelid injury: a case report and review of literature
title_sort penetrating eyelid injury: a case report and review of literature
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2629464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19144194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-5-2
work_keys_str_mv AT wasfiehab penetratingeyelidinjuryacasereportandreviewofliterature
AT kendrickb penetratingeyelidinjuryacasereportandreviewofliterature
AT yasent penetratingeyelidinjuryacasereportandreviewofliterature
AT varmapriya penetratingeyelidinjuryacasereportandreviewofliterature
AT abdelsayedalaaa penetratingeyelidinjuryacasereportandreviewofliterature