Cargando…

Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of patients with early stage endometrial cancer: A randomized multi center study

BACKGROUND: Traditionally standard treatment for patients with early stage endometrial cancer (EC) is total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo oophorectomy (TAH+BSO) with or without lymph node dissection through a vertical midline incision. While TAH is an accepted effective treatment, it...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bijen, Claudia BM, Briët, Justine M, de Bock, Geertruida H, Arts, Henriëtte JG, Bergsma-Kadijk, Johanna A, Mourits, Marian JE
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2630311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19146684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-9-23
_version_ 1782163849501212672
author Bijen, Claudia BM
Briët, Justine M
de Bock, Geertruida H
Arts, Henriëtte JG
Bergsma-Kadijk, Johanna A
Mourits, Marian JE
author_facet Bijen, Claudia BM
Briët, Justine M
de Bock, Geertruida H
Arts, Henriëtte JG
Bergsma-Kadijk, Johanna A
Mourits, Marian JE
author_sort Bijen, Claudia BM
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Traditionally standard treatment for patients with early stage endometrial cancer (EC) is total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo oophorectomy (TAH+BSO) with or without lymph node dissection through a vertical midline incision. While TAH is an accepted effective treatment, it is highly invasive, visibly scarring and associated with morbidity. An alternative treatment is the same operation by laparoscopy. Though in several studies total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH+ BSO) seems a safe and feasible alternative approach in early stage endometrial cancer patients, there are no randomized data available yet. Furthermore, a randomized controlled trial with surgeons trained in laparoscopy is warranted in order to implement this technique in a safe manner. The aim of this study is to compare the treatment related morbidity, cost-effectiveness and quality of life in early stage endometrial cancer patients treated by laparoscopy versus the standard open approach. METHODS: A multi centre randomized clinical phase 3 trial, including 5 university hospitals and 15 regional hospitals in the Netherlands. Only gynecologists trained in performing a TLH are allowed to participate. Inclusion criteria: Patients with a clinical stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma or complex atypical hyperplasia are randomized in a 2:1 allocation to receive TLH or TAH. The main outcome measure is the rate of major complications, as assessed by an independent clinical review board. In total, 275 patients are required to have 80% power at α-0.05 to detect a significant difference of 15% complication rate. Secondary outcome measures are 1) costs and cost-effectiveness, 2) minor complications, and 3) quality of life. All data from this multi center study are reported using case record forms. Data regarding quality of life, pain, body Image, sexuality and additional homecare are assessed with self reported questionnaires. DISCUSSION: A randomized multi center study in early stage endometrial cancer patients with inclusion criteria for patients and surgeons is designed and ongoing. Results will be presented at the end of 2009. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch trial register number NTR821.
format Text
id pubmed-2630311
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26303112009-01-24 Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of patients with early stage endometrial cancer: A randomized multi center study Bijen, Claudia BM Briët, Justine M de Bock, Geertruida H Arts, Henriëtte JG Bergsma-Kadijk, Johanna A Mourits, Marian JE BMC Cancer Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Traditionally standard treatment for patients with early stage endometrial cancer (EC) is total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo oophorectomy (TAH+BSO) with or without lymph node dissection through a vertical midline incision. While TAH is an accepted effective treatment, it is highly invasive, visibly scarring and associated with morbidity. An alternative treatment is the same operation by laparoscopy. Though in several studies total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH+ BSO) seems a safe and feasible alternative approach in early stage endometrial cancer patients, there are no randomized data available yet. Furthermore, a randomized controlled trial with surgeons trained in laparoscopy is warranted in order to implement this technique in a safe manner. The aim of this study is to compare the treatment related morbidity, cost-effectiveness and quality of life in early stage endometrial cancer patients treated by laparoscopy versus the standard open approach. METHODS: A multi centre randomized clinical phase 3 trial, including 5 university hospitals and 15 regional hospitals in the Netherlands. Only gynecologists trained in performing a TLH are allowed to participate. Inclusion criteria: Patients with a clinical stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma or complex atypical hyperplasia are randomized in a 2:1 allocation to receive TLH or TAH. The main outcome measure is the rate of major complications, as assessed by an independent clinical review board. In total, 275 patients are required to have 80% power at α-0.05 to detect a significant difference of 15% complication rate. Secondary outcome measures are 1) costs and cost-effectiveness, 2) minor complications, and 3) quality of life. All data from this multi center study are reported using case record forms. Data regarding quality of life, pain, body Image, sexuality and additional homecare are assessed with self reported questionnaires. DISCUSSION: A randomized multi center study in early stage endometrial cancer patients with inclusion criteria for patients and surgeons is designed and ongoing. Results will be presented at the end of 2009. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch trial register number NTR821. BioMed Central 2009-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC2630311/ /pubmed/19146684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-9-23 Text en Copyright ©2009 Bijen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Bijen, Claudia BM
Briët, Justine M
de Bock, Geertruida H
Arts, Henriëtte JG
Bergsma-Kadijk, Johanna A
Mourits, Marian JE
Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of patients with early stage endometrial cancer: A randomized multi center study
title Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of patients with early stage endometrial cancer: A randomized multi center study
title_full Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of patients with early stage endometrial cancer: A randomized multi center study
title_fullStr Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of patients with early stage endometrial cancer: A randomized multi center study
title_full_unstemmed Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of patients with early stage endometrial cancer: A randomized multi center study
title_short Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of patients with early stage endometrial cancer: A randomized multi center study
title_sort total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of patients with early stage endometrial cancer: a randomized multi center study
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2630311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19146684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-9-23
work_keys_str_mv AT bijenclaudiabm totallaparoscopichysterectomyversusabdominalhysterectomyinthetreatmentofpatientswithearlystageendometrialcancerarandomizedmulticenterstudy
AT brietjustinem totallaparoscopichysterectomyversusabdominalhysterectomyinthetreatmentofpatientswithearlystageendometrialcancerarandomizedmulticenterstudy
AT debockgeertruidah totallaparoscopichysterectomyversusabdominalhysterectomyinthetreatmentofpatientswithearlystageendometrialcancerarandomizedmulticenterstudy
AT artshenriettejg totallaparoscopichysterectomyversusabdominalhysterectomyinthetreatmentofpatientswithearlystageendometrialcancerarandomizedmulticenterstudy
AT bergsmakadijkjohannaa totallaparoscopichysterectomyversusabdominalhysterectomyinthetreatmentofpatientswithearlystageendometrialcancerarandomizedmulticenterstudy
AT mouritsmarianje totallaparoscopichysterectomyversusabdominalhysterectomyinthetreatmentofpatientswithearlystageendometrialcancerarandomizedmulticenterstudy