Cargando…
Reporting of clinical trials: a review of research funders' guidelines
BACKGROUND: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) represent the gold standard methodological design to evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention in humans but they are subject to bias, including study publication bias and outcome reporting bias. National and international organisations and chariti...
Autores principales: | Dwan, Kerry, Gamble, Carrol, Williamson, Paula R, Altman, Douglas G |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2630961/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19032743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-9-66 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Outcome reporting bias in trials: a methodological approach for assessment and adjustment in systematic reviews
por: Kirkham, Jamie J, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Evidence for the Selective Reporting of Analyses and Discrepancies in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Cohort Studies of Clinical Trials
por: Dwan, Kerry, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Selective reporting of outcomes in randomised controlled trials in systematic reviews of cystic fibrosis
por: Dwan, Kerry, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Selective reporting in clinical trials - an examination of discrepancy rates in pre-specified and reported outcomes in articles submitted to the BMJ
por: Weston, Jennifer, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Guidance to detect, evaluate and prevent the problem of selective reporting in trial publications
por: Dwan, Kerry, et al.
Publicado: (2013)