Cargando…

Socioeconomic differences in lack of recreational walking among older adults: the role of neighbourhood and individual factors

BACKGROUND: People with a low socioeconomic status (SES) are more likely to be physically inactive than their higher status counterparts, however, the mechanisms underlying this socioeconomic gradient in physical inactivity remain largely unknown. Our aims were (1) to investigate socioeconomic diffe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kamphuis, Carlijn BM, van Lenthe, Frank J, Giskes, Katrina, Huisman, Martijn, Brug, Johannes, Mackenbach, Johan P
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2631001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19123927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-6-1
_version_ 1782163895121608704
author Kamphuis, Carlijn BM
van Lenthe, Frank J
Giskes, Katrina
Huisman, Martijn
Brug, Johannes
Mackenbach, Johan P
author_facet Kamphuis, Carlijn BM
van Lenthe, Frank J
Giskes, Katrina
Huisman, Martijn
Brug, Johannes
Mackenbach, Johan P
author_sort Kamphuis, Carlijn BM
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: People with a low socioeconomic status (SES) are more likely to be physically inactive than their higher status counterparts, however, the mechanisms underlying this socioeconomic gradient in physical inactivity remain largely unknown. Our aims were (1) to investigate socioeconomic differences in recreational walking among older adults and (2) to examine to what extent neighbourhood perceptions and individual cognitions regarding regular physical activity can explain these differences. METHODS: Data were obtained by a large-scale postal survey among a stratified sample of older adults (age 55–75 years) (N = 1994), residing in 147 neighbourhoods of Eindhoven and surrounding areas, in the Netherlands. Multilevel logistic regression analyses assessed associations between SES (i.e. education and income), perceptions of the social and physical neighbourhood environment, measures of individual cognitions derived from the Theory of Planned Behaviour (e.g. attitude, perceived behaviour control), and recreational walking for ≥10 minutes/week (no vs. yes). RESULTS: Participants in the lowest educational group (OR 1.67 (95% CI, 1.18–2.35)) and lowest income group (OR 1.40 (95% CI, 0.98–2.01)) were more likely to report no recreational walking than their higher status counterparts. The association between SES and recreational walking attenuated when neighbourhood aesthetics was included in the model, and largely reduced when individual cognitions were added to the model (with largest effects of attitude, and intention regarding regular physical activity). The assiation between poor neighbourhood aesthetics and no recreational walking attenuated to (borderline) insignificance when individual cognitions were taken into account. CONCLUSION: Both neighbourhood aesthetics and individual cognitions regarding physical activity contributed to the explanation of socioeconomic differences in no recreational walking. Neighbourhood aesthetics may explain the association between SES and recreational walking largely via individual cognitions towards physical activity. Intervention and policy strategies to reduce socioeconomic differences in lack of recreational walking among older adults would be most effective if they intervene on both neighbourhood perceptions as well as individual cognitions.
format Text
id pubmed-2631001
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26310012009-01-27 Socioeconomic differences in lack of recreational walking among older adults: the role of neighbourhood and individual factors Kamphuis, Carlijn BM van Lenthe, Frank J Giskes, Katrina Huisman, Martijn Brug, Johannes Mackenbach, Johan P Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Research BACKGROUND: People with a low socioeconomic status (SES) are more likely to be physically inactive than their higher status counterparts, however, the mechanisms underlying this socioeconomic gradient in physical inactivity remain largely unknown. Our aims were (1) to investigate socioeconomic differences in recreational walking among older adults and (2) to examine to what extent neighbourhood perceptions and individual cognitions regarding regular physical activity can explain these differences. METHODS: Data were obtained by a large-scale postal survey among a stratified sample of older adults (age 55–75 years) (N = 1994), residing in 147 neighbourhoods of Eindhoven and surrounding areas, in the Netherlands. Multilevel logistic regression analyses assessed associations between SES (i.e. education and income), perceptions of the social and physical neighbourhood environment, measures of individual cognitions derived from the Theory of Planned Behaviour (e.g. attitude, perceived behaviour control), and recreational walking for ≥10 minutes/week (no vs. yes). RESULTS: Participants in the lowest educational group (OR 1.67 (95% CI, 1.18–2.35)) and lowest income group (OR 1.40 (95% CI, 0.98–2.01)) were more likely to report no recreational walking than their higher status counterparts. The association between SES and recreational walking attenuated when neighbourhood aesthetics was included in the model, and largely reduced when individual cognitions were added to the model (with largest effects of attitude, and intention regarding regular physical activity). The assiation between poor neighbourhood aesthetics and no recreational walking attenuated to (borderline) insignificance when individual cognitions were taken into account. CONCLUSION: Both neighbourhood aesthetics and individual cognitions regarding physical activity contributed to the explanation of socioeconomic differences in no recreational walking. Neighbourhood aesthetics may explain the association between SES and recreational walking largely via individual cognitions towards physical activity. Intervention and policy strategies to reduce socioeconomic differences in lack of recreational walking among older adults would be most effective if they intervene on both neighbourhood perceptions as well as individual cognitions. BioMed Central 2009-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC2631001/ /pubmed/19123927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-6-1 Text en Copyright © 2009 Kamphuis et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Kamphuis, Carlijn BM
van Lenthe, Frank J
Giskes, Katrina
Huisman, Martijn
Brug, Johannes
Mackenbach, Johan P
Socioeconomic differences in lack of recreational walking among older adults: the role of neighbourhood and individual factors
title Socioeconomic differences in lack of recreational walking among older adults: the role of neighbourhood and individual factors
title_full Socioeconomic differences in lack of recreational walking among older adults: the role of neighbourhood and individual factors
title_fullStr Socioeconomic differences in lack of recreational walking among older adults: the role of neighbourhood and individual factors
title_full_unstemmed Socioeconomic differences in lack of recreational walking among older adults: the role of neighbourhood and individual factors
title_short Socioeconomic differences in lack of recreational walking among older adults: the role of neighbourhood and individual factors
title_sort socioeconomic differences in lack of recreational walking among older adults: the role of neighbourhood and individual factors
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2631001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19123927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-6-1
work_keys_str_mv AT kamphuiscarlijnbm socioeconomicdifferencesinlackofrecreationalwalkingamongolderadultstheroleofneighbourhoodandindividualfactors
AT vanlenthefrankj socioeconomicdifferencesinlackofrecreationalwalkingamongolderadultstheroleofneighbourhoodandindividualfactors
AT giskeskatrina socioeconomicdifferencesinlackofrecreationalwalkingamongolderadultstheroleofneighbourhoodandindividualfactors
AT huismanmartijn socioeconomicdifferencesinlackofrecreationalwalkingamongolderadultstheroleofneighbourhoodandindividualfactors
AT brugjohannes socioeconomicdifferencesinlackofrecreationalwalkingamongolderadultstheroleofneighbourhoodandindividualfactors
AT mackenbachjohanp socioeconomicdifferencesinlackofrecreationalwalkingamongolderadultstheroleofneighbourhoodandindividualfactors