Cargando…

HER-2/neu amplification testing in breast cancer by Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification: influence of manual- and laser microdissection

BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of HER-2/neu status is crucial for proper prognostic information and to offer direct appropriate treatment for breast cancer patients. Next to immunohistochemistry (IHC) to evaluate HER2 protein overexpression, a second line gene amplification test is generally deemed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moelans, Cathy B, de Weger, Roel A, Ezendam, Chantal, van Diest, Paul J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2631004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19123950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-9-4
_version_ 1782163895823106048
author Moelans, Cathy B
de Weger, Roel A
Ezendam, Chantal
van Diest, Paul J
author_facet Moelans, Cathy B
de Weger, Roel A
Ezendam, Chantal
van Diest, Paul J
author_sort Moelans, Cathy B
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of HER-2/neu status is crucial for proper prognostic information and to offer direct appropriate treatment for breast cancer patients. Next to immunohistochemistry (IHC) to evaluate HER2 protein overexpression, a second line gene amplification test is generally deemed necessary for cases with equivocal protein expression. Recently, a new PCR based test, called Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA), was introduced as a simple and quick method to assess HER-2/neu gene amplification status in invasive breast cancer. MLPA was previously shown to correlate well with IHC and in situ hybridization (ISH), but a low tumor percentage in the tissue tested could negatively affect the accuracy of MLPA results. METHODS: To examine this, MLPA was repeated in 42 patients after serial H&E section guided manual dissection with a scalpel and after laser microdissection of the tumor. RESULTS: Both dissection techniques led to higher HER2 gene copy number ratios and thereby made MLPA more quantitative. Concordance between MLPA and ISH improved from 61% to 84% after manual microdissection and to 90% after laser microdissection. CONCLUSION: Manual and laser microdissection similarly increase the dynamic range of MLPA copy number ratios which is a technical advantage. As clinically a dichotomization between normal and amplified suffices and MLPA is relatively unsensitive to tumor content, microdissection before MLPA may not be routinely necessary but may be advisable in case of very low tumor content (≤30%), when MLPA results are equivocal, or when extensive ductal carcinoma in situ is present. Since differences between manual and laser microdissection were small, less time consuming manual microdissection appears to be sufficient.
format Text
id pubmed-2631004
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26310042009-01-27 HER-2/neu amplification testing in breast cancer by Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification: influence of manual- and laser microdissection Moelans, Cathy B de Weger, Roel A Ezendam, Chantal van Diest, Paul J BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of HER-2/neu status is crucial for proper prognostic information and to offer direct appropriate treatment for breast cancer patients. Next to immunohistochemistry (IHC) to evaluate HER2 protein overexpression, a second line gene amplification test is generally deemed necessary for cases with equivocal protein expression. Recently, a new PCR based test, called Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA), was introduced as a simple and quick method to assess HER-2/neu gene amplification status in invasive breast cancer. MLPA was previously shown to correlate well with IHC and in situ hybridization (ISH), but a low tumor percentage in the tissue tested could negatively affect the accuracy of MLPA results. METHODS: To examine this, MLPA was repeated in 42 patients after serial H&E section guided manual dissection with a scalpel and after laser microdissection of the tumor. RESULTS: Both dissection techniques led to higher HER2 gene copy number ratios and thereby made MLPA more quantitative. Concordance between MLPA and ISH improved from 61% to 84% after manual microdissection and to 90% after laser microdissection. CONCLUSION: Manual and laser microdissection similarly increase the dynamic range of MLPA copy number ratios which is a technical advantage. As clinically a dichotomization between normal and amplified suffices and MLPA is relatively unsensitive to tumor content, microdissection before MLPA may not be routinely necessary but may be advisable in case of very low tumor content (≤30%), when MLPA results are equivocal, or when extensive ductal carcinoma in situ is present. Since differences between manual and laser microdissection were small, less time consuming manual microdissection appears to be sufficient. BioMed Central 2009-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC2631004/ /pubmed/19123950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-9-4 Text en Copyright ©2009 Moelans et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Moelans, Cathy B
de Weger, Roel A
Ezendam, Chantal
van Diest, Paul J
HER-2/neu amplification testing in breast cancer by Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification: influence of manual- and laser microdissection
title HER-2/neu amplification testing in breast cancer by Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification: influence of manual- and laser microdissection
title_full HER-2/neu amplification testing in breast cancer by Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification: influence of manual- and laser microdissection
title_fullStr HER-2/neu amplification testing in breast cancer by Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification: influence of manual- and laser microdissection
title_full_unstemmed HER-2/neu amplification testing in breast cancer by Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification: influence of manual- and laser microdissection
title_short HER-2/neu amplification testing in breast cancer by Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification: influence of manual- and laser microdissection
title_sort her-2/neu amplification testing in breast cancer by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification: influence of manual- and laser microdissection
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2631004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19123950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-9-4
work_keys_str_mv AT moelanscathyb her2neuamplificationtestinginbreastcancerbymultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationinfluenceofmanualandlasermicrodissection
AT dewegerroela her2neuamplificationtestinginbreastcancerbymultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationinfluenceofmanualandlasermicrodissection
AT ezendamchantal her2neuamplificationtestinginbreastcancerbymultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationinfluenceofmanualandlasermicrodissection
AT vandiestpaulj her2neuamplificationtestinginbreastcancerbymultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationinfluenceofmanualandlasermicrodissection