Cargando…

A SNP transferability survey within the genus Vitis

BACKGROUND: Efforts to sequence the genomes of different organisms continue to increase. The DNA sequence is usually decoded for one individual and its application is for the whole species. The recent sequencing of the highly heterozygous Vitis vinifera L. cultivar Pinot Noir (clone ENTAV 115) genom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vezzulli, Silvia, Micheletti, Diego, Riaz, Summaira, Pindo, Massimo, Viola, Roberto, This, Patrice, Walker, M Andrew, Troggio, Michela, Velasco, Riccardo
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2631481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19087337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-8-128
_version_ 1782163929453035520
author Vezzulli, Silvia
Micheletti, Diego
Riaz, Summaira
Pindo, Massimo
Viola, Roberto
This, Patrice
Walker, M Andrew
Troggio, Michela
Velasco, Riccardo
author_facet Vezzulli, Silvia
Micheletti, Diego
Riaz, Summaira
Pindo, Massimo
Viola, Roberto
This, Patrice
Walker, M Andrew
Troggio, Michela
Velasco, Riccardo
author_sort Vezzulli, Silvia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Efforts to sequence the genomes of different organisms continue to increase. The DNA sequence is usually decoded for one individual and its application is for the whole species. The recent sequencing of the highly heterozygous Vitis vinifera L. cultivar Pinot Noir (clone ENTAV 115) genome gave rise to several thousand polymorphisms and offers a good model to study the transferability of its degree of polymorphism to other individuals of the same species and within the genus. RESULTS: This study was performed by genotyping 137 SNPs through the SNPlex™ Genotyping System (Applied Biosystems Inc.) and by comparing the SNPlex sequencing results across 35 (of the 137) regions from 69 grape accessions. A heterozygous state transferability of 31.5% across the unrelated cultivars of V. vinifera, of 18.8% across the wild forms of V. vinifera, of 2.3% among non-vinifera Vitis species, and of 0% with Muscadinia rotundifolia was found. In addition, mean allele frequencies were used to evaluate SNP informativeness and develop useful subsets of markers. CONCLUSION: Using SNPlex application and corroboration from the sequencing analysis, the informativeness of SNP markers from the heterozygous grape cultivar Pinot Noir was validated in V. vinifera (including cultivars and wild forms), but had a limited application for non-vinifera Vitis species where a resequencing strategy may be preferred, knowing that homology at priming sites is sufficient. This work will allow future applications such as mapping and diversity studies, accession identification and genomic-research assisted breeding within V. vinifera.
format Text
id pubmed-2631481
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26314812009-01-28 A SNP transferability survey within the genus Vitis Vezzulli, Silvia Micheletti, Diego Riaz, Summaira Pindo, Massimo Viola, Roberto This, Patrice Walker, M Andrew Troggio, Michela Velasco, Riccardo BMC Plant Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Efforts to sequence the genomes of different organisms continue to increase. The DNA sequence is usually decoded for one individual and its application is for the whole species. The recent sequencing of the highly heterozygous Vitis vinifera L. cultivar Pinot Noir (clone ENTAV 115) genome gave rise to several thousand polymorphisms and offers a good model to study the transferability of its degree of polymorphism to other individuals of the same species and within the genus. RESULTS: This study was performed by genotyping 137 SNPs through the SNPlex™ Genotyping System (Applied Biosystems Inc.) and by comparing the SNPlex sequencing results across 35 (of the 137) regions from 69 grape accessions. A heterozygous state transferability of 31.5% across the unrelated cultivars of V. vinifera, of 18.8% across the wild forms of V. vinifera, of 2.3% among non-vinifera Vitis species, and of 0% with Muscadinia rotundifolia was found. In addition, mean allele frequencies were used to evaluate SNP informativeness and develop useful subsets of markers. CONCLUSION: Using SNPlex application and corroboration from the sequencing analysis, the informativeness of SNP markers from the heterozygous grape cultivar Pinot Noir was validated in V. vinifera (including cultivars and wild forms), but had a limited application for non-vinifera Vitis species where a resequencing strategy may be preferred, knowing that homology at priming sites is sufficient. This work will allow future applications such as mapping and diversity studies, accession identification and genomic-research assisted breeding within V. vinifera. BioMed Central 2008-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC2631481/ /pubmed/19087337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-8-128 Text en Copyright © 2008 Vezzulli et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vezzulli, Silvia
Micheletti, Diego
Riaz, Summaira
Pindo, Massimo
Viola, Roberto
This, Patrice
Walker, M Andrew
Troggio, Michela
Velasco, Riccardo
A SNP transferability survey within the genus Vitis
title A SNP transferability survey within the genus Vitis
title_full A SNP transferability survey within the genus Vitis
title_fullStr A SNP transferability survey within the genus Vitis
title_full_unstemmed A SNP transferability survey within the genus Vitis
title_short A SNP transferability survey within the genus Vitis
title_sort snp transferability survey within the genus vitis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2631481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19087337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-8-128
work_keys_str_mv AT vezzullisilvia asnptransferabilitysurveywithinthegenusvitis
AT michelettidiego asnptransferabilitysurveywithinthegenusvitis
AT riazsummaira asnptransferabilitysurveywithinthegenusvitis
AT pindomassimo asnptransferabilitysurveywithinthegenusvitis
AT violaroberto asnptransferabilitysurveywithinthegenusvitis
AT thispatrice asnptransferabilitysurveywithinthegenusvitis
AT walkermandrew asnptransferabilitysurveywithinthegenusvitis
AT troggiomichela asnptransferabilitysurveywithinthegenusvitis
AT velascoriccardo asnptransferabilitysurveywithinthegenusvitis
AT vezzullisilvia snptransferabilitysurveywithinthegenusvitis
AT michelettidiego snptransferabilitysurveywithinthegenusvitis
AT riazsummaira snptransferabilitysurveywithinthegenusvitis
AT pindomassimo snptransferabilitysurveywithinthegenusvitis
AT violaroberto snptransferabilitysurveywithinthegenusvitis
AT thispatrice snptransferabilitysurveywithinthegenusvitis
AT walkermandrew snptransferabilitysurveywithinthegenusvitis
AT troggiomichela snptransferabilitysurveywithinthegenusvitis
AT velascoriccardo snptransferabilitysurveywithinthegenusvitis