Cargando…

Readers as research detectives

Flaws in research papers are common but it may require arduous detective work to unravel them. Checklists are helpful, but many inconsistencies will only be revealed through repeated cross-checks of every little detail, just like in a crime case. As a major deterrent for dishonesty, raw data from al...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Gøtzsche, Peter C
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2632628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19128482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-10-2
_version_ 1782164028113551360
author Gøtzsche, Peter C
author_facet Gøtzsche, Peter C
author_sort Gøtzsche, Peter C
collection PubMed
description Flaws in research papers are common but it may require arduous detective work to unravel them. Checklists are helpful, but many inconsistencies will only be revealed through repeated cross-checks of every little detail, just like in a crime case. As a major deterrent for dishonesty, raw data from all trials should be posted on a public website. This would also make it much easier to detect errors and flaws in publications, and it would allow many research projects to be performed without collecting new data. The prevailing culture of secrecy and ownership to data is not in the best interests of patients.
format Text
id pubmed-2632628
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26326282009-01-29 Readers as research detectives Gøtzsche, Peter C Trials Commentary Flaws in research papers are common but it may require arduous detective work to unravel them. Checklists are helpful, but many inconsistencies will only be revealed through repeated cross-checks of every little detail, just like in a crime case. As a major deterrent for dishonesty, raw data from all trials should be posted on a public website. This would also make it much easier to detect errors and flaws in publications, and it would allow many research projects to be performed without collecting new data. The prevailing culture of secrecy and ownership to data is not in the best interests of patients. BioMed Central 2009-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC2632628/ /pubmed/19128482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-10-2 Text en Copyright © 2009 Gøtzsche; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Commentary
Gøtzsche, Peter C
Readers as research detectives
title Readers as research detectives
title_full Readers as research detectives
title_fullStr Readers as research detectives
title_full_unstemmed Readers as research detectives
title_short Readers as research detectives
title_sort readers as research detectives
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2632628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19128482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-10-2
work_keys_str_mv AT gøtzschepeterc readersasresearchdetectives