Cargando…
Readers as research detectives
Flaws in research papers are common but it may require arduous detective work to unravel them. Checklists are helpful, but many inconsistencies will only be revealed through repeated cross-checks of every little detail, just like in a crime case. As a major deterrent for dishonesty, raw data from al...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2632628/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19128482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-10-2 |
_version_ | 1782164028113551360 |
---|---|
author | Gøtzsche, Peter C |
author_facet | Gøtzsche, Peter C |
author_sort | Gøtzsche, Peter C |
collection | PubMed |
description | Flaws in research papers are common but it may require arduous detective work to unravel them. Checklists are helpful, but many inconsistencies will only be revealed through repeated cross-checks of every little detail, just like in a crime case. As a major deterrent for dishonesty, raw data from all trials should be posted on a public website. This would also make it much easier to detect errors and flaws in publications, and it would allow many research projects to be performed without collecting new data. The prevailing culture of secrecy and ownership to data is not in the best interests of patients. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2632628 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26326282009-01-29 Readers as research detectives Gøtzsche, Peter C Trials Commentary Flaws in research papers are common but it may require arduous detective work to unravel them. Checklists are helpful, but many inconsistencies will only be revealed through repeated cross-checks of every little detail, just like in a crime case. As a major deterrent for dishonesty, raw data from all trials should be posted on a public website. This would also make it much easier to detect errors and flaws in publications, and it would allow many research projects to be performed without collecting new data. The prevailing culture of secrecy and ownership to data is not in the best interests of patients. BioMed Central 2009-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC2632628/ /pubmed/19128482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-10-2 Text en Copyright © 2009 Gøtzsche; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Gøtzsche, Peter C Readers as research detectives |
title | Readers as research detectives |
title_full | Readers as research detectives |
title_fullStr | Readers as research detectives |
title_full_unstemmed | Readers as research detectives |
title_short | Readers as research detectives |
title_sort | readers as research detectives |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2632628/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19128482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-10-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gøtzschepeterc readersasresearchdetectives |