Cargando…

Enhanced external counter pulsation in treatment of refractory angina pectoris: two year outcome and baseline factors associated with treatment failure

BACKGROUND: Enhanced external counter pulsation (EECP) is a non-invasive treatment option for patients with refractory angina pectoris ineligible to further traditional treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of EECP on patients at a Scandinavian medical centre and to investigate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Erdling, André, Bondesson, Susanne, Pettersson, Thomas, Edvinsson, Lars
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2632654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19094202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-8-39
_version_ 1782164034242478080
author Erdling, André
Bondesson, Susanne
Pettersson, Thomas
Edvinsson, Lars
author_facet Erdling, André
Bondesson, Susanne
Pettersson, Thomas
Edvinsson, Lars
author_sort Erdling, André
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Enhanced external counter pulsation (EECP) is a non-invasive treatment option for patients with refractory angina pectoris ineligible to further traditional treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of EECP on patients at a Scandinavian medical centre and to investigate if outcome can be predicted by analysing baseline factors. METHODS: 86 consecutive patients (70 male, 16 female) were treated with EECP and followed for two years post treatment. Canadian cardiovascular society (CCS) class was analysed, and medication and adverse clinical events were researched prior to EECP, at the end of the treatment, and at six, 12 and 24 months thereafter. Patients responding to therapy by improving at least one CCS class were compared with those who failed to respond. Any differences in background factors were recorded and analysed. RESULTS: 79% of the patients responded to therapy by improving at least one CCS class. In general, the CCS class improved by one class after EECP treatment (3.05 before versus 2.14 after treatment). A total of 61.5% of the initial responders showed sustained improvement at the 12 month follow-up while 29% presented sustained improvement after 24 months. Treatment was most effective among patients suffering from CCS class III-IV angina pectoris, while patients suffering from CCS class II angina pectoris improved transiently but failed to show sustained improvement after the 12 month follow-up. Diabetes mellitus and calcium channel antagonists were more common among the non-responders (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study confirms the safety and efficiency of EECP as a treatment option for patients suffering from refractory angina pectoris. The therapy is most beneficial in patients suffering from severe angina (CCS III-IV) while sustained response to therapy could not be verified among patients suffering from CCS class II angina pectoris.
format Text
id pubmed-2632654
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26326542009-01-29 Enhanced external counter pulsation in treatment of refractory angina pectoris: two year outcome and baseline factors associated with treatment failure Erdling, André Bondesson, Susanne Pettersson, Thomas Edvinsson, Lars BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Enhanced external counter pulsation (EECP) is a non-invasive treatment option for patients with refractory angina pectoris ineligible to further traditional treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of EECP on patients at a Scandinavian medical centre and to investigate if outcome can be predicted by analysing baseline factors. METHODS: 86 consecutive patients (70 male, 16 female) were treated with EECP and followed for two years post treatment. Canadian cardiovascular society (CCS) class was analysed, and medication and adverse clinical events were researched prior to EECP, at the end of the treatment, and at six, 12 and 24 months thereafter. Patients responding to therapy by improving at least one CCS class were compared with those who failed to respond. Any differences in background factors were recorded and analysed. RESULTS: 79% of the patients responded to therapy by improving at least one CCS class. In general, the CCS class improved by one class after EECP treatment (3.05 before versus 2.14 after treatment). A total of 61.5% of the initial responders showed sustained improvement at the 12 month follow-up while 29% presented sustained improvement after 24 months. Treatment was most effective among patients suffering from CCS class III-IV angina pectoris, while patients suffering from CCS class II angina pectoris improved transiently but failed to show sustained improvement after the 12 month follow-up. Diabetes mellitus and calcium channel antagonists were more common among the non-responders (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study confirms the safety and efficiency of EECP as a treatment option for patients suffering from refractory angina pectoris. The therapy is most beneficial in patients suffering from severe angina (CCS III-IV) while sustained response to therapy could not be verified among patients suffering from CCS class II angina pectoris. BioMed Central 2008-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC2632654/ /pubmed/19094202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-8-39 Text en Copyright © 2008 Erdling et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Erdling, André
Bondesson, Susanne
Pettersson, Thomas
Edvinsson, Lars
Enhanced external counter pulsation in treatment of refractory angina pectoris: two year outcome and baseline factors associated with treatment failure
title Enhanced external counter pulsation in treatment of refractory angina pectoris: two year outcome and baseline factors associated with treatment failure
title_full Enhanced external counter pulsation in treatment of refractory angina pectoris: two year outcome and baseline factors associated with treatment failure
title_fullStr Enhanced external counter pulsation in treatment of refractory angina pectoris: two year outcome and baseline factors associated with treatment failure
title_full_unstemmed Enhanced external counter pulsation in treatment of refractory angina pectoris: two year outcome and baseline factors associated with treatment failure
title_short Enhanced external counter pulsation in treatment of refractory angina pectoris: two year outcome and baseline factors associated with treatment failure
title_sort enhanced external counter pulsation in treatment of refractory angina pectoris: two year outcome and baseline factors associated with treatment failure
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2632654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19094202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-8-39
work_keys_str_mv AT erdlingandre enhancedexternalcounterpulsationintreatmentofrefractoryanginapectoristwoyearoutcomeandbaselinefactorsassociatedwithtreatmentfailure
AT bondessonsusanne enhancedexternalcounterpulsationintreatmentofrefractoryanginapectoristwoyearoutcomeandbaselinefactorsassociatedwithtreatmentfailure
AT petterssonthomas enhancedexternalcounterpulsationintreatmentofrefractoryanginapectoristwoyearoutcomeandbaselinefactorsassociatedwithtreatmentfailure
AT edvinssonlars enhancedexternalcounterpulsationintreatmentofrefractoryanginapectoristwoyearoutcomeandbaselinefactorsassociatedwithtreatmentfailure