Cargando…
Purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression
BACKGROUND: The main problem in many model-building situations is to choose from a large set of covariates those that should be included in the "best" model. A decision to keep a variable in the model might be based on the clinical or statistical significance. There are several variable se...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2633005/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19087314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1751-0473-3-17 |
_version_ | 1782164066983215104 |
---|---|
author | Bursac, Zoran Gauss, C Heath Williams, David Keith Hosmer, David W |
author_facet | Bursac, Zoran Gauss, C Heath Williams, David Keith Hosmer, David W |
author_sort | Bursac, Zoran |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The main problem in many model-building situations is to choose from a large set of covariates those that should be included in the "best" model. A decision to keep a variable in the model might be based on the clinical or statistical significance. There are several variable selection algorithms in existence. Those methods are mechanical and as such carry some limitations. Hosmer and Lemeshow describe a purposeful selection of covariates within which an analyst makes a variable selection decision at each step of the modeling process. METHODS: In this paper we introduce an algorithm which automates that process. We conduct a simulation study to compare the performance of this algorithm with three well documented variable selection procedures in SAS PROC LOGISTIC: FORWARD, BACKWARD, and STEPWISE. RESULTS: We show that the advantage of this approach is when the analyst is interested in risk factor modeling and not just prediction. In addition to significant covariates, this variable selection procedure has the capability of retaining important confounding variables, resulting potentially in a slightly richer model. Application of the macro is further illustrated with the Hosmer and Lemeshow Worchester Heart Attack Study (WHAS) data. CONCLUSION: If an analyst is in need of an algorithm that will help guide the retention of significant covariates as well as confounding ones they should consider this macro as an alternative tool. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2633005 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26330052009-01-30 Purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression Bursac, Zoran Gauss, C Heath Williams, David Keith Hosmer, David W Source Code Biol Med Research BACKGROUND: The main problem in many model-building situations is to choose from a large set of covariates those that should be included in the "best" model. A decision to keep a variable in the model might be based on the clinical or statistical significance. There are several variable selection algorithms in existence. Those methods are mechanical and as such carry some limitations. Hosmer and Lemeshow describe a purposeful selection of covariates within which an analyst makes a variable selection decision at each step of the modeling process. METHODS: In this paper we introduce an algorithm which automates that process. We conduct a simulation study to compare the performance of this algorithm with three well documented variable selection procedures in SAS PROC LOGISTIC: FORWARD, BACKWARD, and STEPWISE. RESULTS: We show that the advantage of this approach is when the analyst is interested in risk factor modeling and not just prediction. In addition to significant covariates, this variable selection procedure has the capability of retaining important confounding variables, resulting potentially in a slightly richer model. Application of the macro is further illustrated with the Hosmer and Lemeshow Worchester Heart Attack Study (WHAS) data. CONCLUSION: If an analyst is in need of an algorithm that will help guide the retention of significant covariates as well as confounding ones they should consider this macro as an alternative tool. BioMed Central 2008-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC2633005/ /pubmed/19087314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1751-0473-3-17 Text en Copyright © 2008 Bursac et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Bursac, Zoran Gauss, C Heath Williams, David Keith Hosmer, David W Purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression |
title | Purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression |
title_full | Purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression |
title_fullStr | Purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression |
title_full_unstemmed | Purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression |
title_short | Purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression |
title_sort | purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2633005/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19087314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1751-0473-3-17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bursaczoran purposefulselectionofvariablesinlogisticregression AT gausscheath purposefulselectionofvariablesinlogisticregression AT williamsdavidkeith purposefulselectionofvariablesinlogisticregression AT hosmerdavidw purposefulselectionofvariablesinlogisticregression |