Cargando…

Responsiveness of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index in patients with adhesive capsulitis

BACKGROUND: Instruments designed to measure the subjective impact of painful shoulder conditions have become essential in shoulder research. The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) is one of the most extensively used scales of this type. The objective of this study was to investigate reproduc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tveitå, Einar Kristian, Ekeberg, Ole Marius, Juel, Niels Gunnar, Bautz-Holter, Erik
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2633286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19055757
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-161
_version_ 1782164096308740096
author Tveitå, Einar Kristian
Ekeberg, Ole Marius
Juel, Niels Gunnar
Bautz-Holter, Erik
author_facet Tveitå, Einar Kristian
Ekeberg, Ole Marius
Juel, Niels Gunnar
Bautz-Holter, Erik
author_sort Tveitå, Einar Kristian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Instruments designed to measure the subjective impact of painful shoulder conditions have become essential in shoulder research. The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) is one of the most extensively used scales of this type. The objective of this study was to investigate reproducibility and responsiveness of the SPADI in patients with adhesive capsulitis. METHODS: SPADI test-retest reproducibility was estimated by the "intraclass correlation coefficient" (ICC) and the "smallest detectable difference" (SDD). Responsiveness was assessed by exploring baseline and follow-up data recorded in a recently reported clinical trial regarding hydrodilatation and corticosteroid injections in 76 patients with adhesive capsulitis. "Standardized response mean" (SRM) and "reliable change proportion" (RCP) for SPADI were compared with corresponding figures for shoulder range-of-motion (ROM). The relationship between SPADI and ROM change scores was investigated through correlation and linear regression analyses. RESULTS: Results for test-retest reproducibility indicated a smallest detectable difference of 17 points on the 0–100 scale, and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.89. The SPADI was generally more responsive than ROM. Weak to moderately strong associations were identified between SPADI and ROM change scores. According to the regression model, the three variables baseline SPADI, baseline active ROM and change in active ROM together explained 60% of the variance in SPADI improvement. CONCLUSION: This study supports the use of SPADI as an outcome measure in similar settings.
format Text
id pubmed-2633286
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26332862009-01-31 Responsiveness of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index in patients with adhesive capsulitis Tveitå, Einar Kristian Ekeberg, Ole Marius Juel, Niels Gunnar Bautz-Holter, Erik BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Instruments designed to measure the subjective impact of painful shoulder conditions have become essential in shoulder research. The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) is one of the most extensively used scales of this type. The objective of this study was to investigate reproducibility and responsiveness of the SPADI in patients with adhesive capsulitis. METHODS: SPADI test-retest reproducibility was estimated by the "intraclass correlation coefficient" (ICC) and the "smallest detectable difference" (SDD). Responsiveness was assessed by exploring baseline and follow-up data recorded in a recently reported clinical trial regarding hydrodilatation and corticosteroid injections in 76 patients with adhesive capsulitis. "Standardized response mean" (SRM) and "reliable change proportion" (RCP) for SPADI were compared with corresponding figures for shoulder range-of-motion (ROM). The relationship between SPADI and ROM change scores was investigated through correlation and linear regression analyses. RESULTS: Results for test-retest reproducibility indicated a smallest detectable difference of 17 points on the 0–100 scale, and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.89. The SPADI was generally more responsive than ROM. Weak to moderately strong associations were identified between SPADI and ROM change scores. According to the regression model, the three variables baseline SPADI, baseline active ROM and change in active ROM together explained 60% of the variance in SPADI improvement. CONCLUSION: This study supports the use of SPADI as an outcome measure in similar settings. BioMed Central 2008-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2633286/ /pubmed/19055757 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-161 Text en Copyright © 2008 Tveitå et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tveitå, Einar Kristian
Ekeberg, Ole Marius
Juel, Niels Gunnar
Bautz-Holter, Erik
Responsiveness of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index in patients with adhesive capsulitis
title Responsiveness of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index in patients with adhesive capsulitis
title_full Responsiveness of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index in patients with adhesive capsulitis
title_fullStr Responsiveness of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index in patients with adhesive capsulitis
title_full_unstemmed Responsiveness of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index in patients with adhesive capsulitis
title_short Responsiveness of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index in patients with adhesive capsulitis
title_sort responsiveness of the shoulder pain and disability index in patients with adhesive capsulitis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2633286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19055757
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-161
work_keys_str_mv AT tveitaeinarkristian responsivenessoftheshoulderpainanddisabilityindexinpatientswithadhesivecapsulitis
AT ekebergolemarius responsivenessoftheshoulderpainanddisabilityindexinpatientswithadhesivecapsulitis
AT juelnielsgunnar responsivenessoftheshoulderpainanddisabilityindexinpatientswithadhesivecapsulitis
AT bautzholtererik responsivenessoftheshoulderpainanddisabilityindexinpatientswithadhesivecapsulitis