Cargando…

Similar rates of protein adaptation in Drosophila miranda and D. melanogaster, two species with different current effective population sizes

BACKGROUND: Adaptive protein evolution is common in several Drosophila species investigated. Some studies point to very weak selection operating on amino-acid mutations, with average selection intensities on the order of N(e)s ~ 5 in D. melanogaster and D. simulans. Species with lower effective popu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Bachtrog, Doris
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2633301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19091130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-334
_version_ 1782164097981218816
author Bachtrog, Doris
author_facet Bachtrog, Doris
author_sort Bachtrog, Doris
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Adaptive protein evolution is common in several Drosophila species investigated. Some studies point to very weak selection operating on amino-acid mutations, with average selection intensities on the order of N(e)s ~ 5 in D. melanogaster and D. simulans. Species with lower effective population sizes should undergo less adaptation since they generate fewer mutations and selection is ineffective on a greater proportion of beneficial mutations. RESULTS: Here I study patterns of polymorphism and divergence at 91 X-linked loci in D. miranda, a species with a roughly 5-fold smaller effective population size than D. melanogaster. Surprisingly, I find a similar fraction of amino-acid mutations being driven to fixation by positive selection in D. miranda and D. melanogaster. Genes with higher rates of amino-acid evolution show lower levels of neutral diversity, a pattern predicted by recurrent adaptive protein evolution. I fit a hitchhiking model to patterns of polymorphism in D. miranda and D. melanogaster and estimate an order of magnitude higher selection coefficients for beneficial mutations in D. miranda. CONCLUSION: This analysis suggests that effective population size may not be a major determinant in rates of protein adaptation. Instead, adaptation may not be mutation-limited, or the distribution of fitness effects for beneficial mutations might differ vastly between different species or populations. Alternative explanation such as biases in estimating the fraction of beneficial mutations or slightly deleterious mutation models are also discussed.
format Text
id pubmed-2633301
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26333012009-02-02 Similar rates of protein adaptation in Drosophila miranda and D. melanogaster, two species with different current effective population sizes Bachtrog, Doris BMC Evol Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Adaptive protein evolution is common in several Drosophila species investigated. Some studies point to very weak selection operating on amino-acid mutations, with average selection intensities on the order of N(e)s ~ 5 in D. melanogaster and D. simulans. Species with lower effective population sizes should undergo less adaptation since they generate fewer mutations and selection is ineffective on a greater proportion of beneficial mutations. RESULTS: Here I study patterns of polymorphism and divergence at 91 X-linked loci in D. miranda, a species with a roughly 5-fold smaller effective population size than D. melanogaster. Surprisingly, I find a similar fraction of amino-acid mutations being driven to fixation by positive selection in D. miranda and D. melanogaster. Genes with higher rates of amino-acid evolution show lower levels of neutral diversity, a pattern predicted by recurrent adaptive protein evolution. I fit a hitchhiking model to patterns of polymorphism in D. miranda and D. melanogaster and estimate an order of magnitude higher selection coefficients for beneficial mutations in D. miranda. CONCLUSION: This analysis suggests that effective population size may not be a major determinant in rates of protein adaptation. Instead, adaptation may not be mutation-limited, or the distribution of fitness effects for beneficial mutations might differ vastly between different species or populations. Alternative explanation such as biases in estimating the fraction of beneficial mutations or slightly deleterious mutation models are also discussed. BioMed Central 2008-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC2633301/ /pubmed/19091130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-334 Text en Copyright ©2008 Bachtrog; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bachtrog, Doris
Similar rates of protein adaptation in Drosophila miranda and D. melanogaster, two species with different current effective population sizes
title Similar rates of protein adaptation in Drosophila miranda and D. melanogaster, two species with different current effective population sizes
title_full Similar rates of protein adaptation in Drosophila miranda and D. melanogaster, two species with different current effective population sizes
title_fullStr Similar rates of protein adaptation in Drosophila miranda and D. melanogaster, two species with different current effective population sizes
title_full_unstemmed Similar rates of protein adaptation in Drosophila miranda and D. melanogaster, two species with different current effective population sizes
title_short Similar rates of protein adaptation in Drosophila miranda and D. melanogaster, two species with different current effective population sizes
title_sort similar rates of protein adaptation in drosophila miranda and d. melanogaster, two species with different current effective population sizes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2633301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19091130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-334
work_keys_str_mv AT bachtrogdoris similarratesofproteinadaptationindrosophilamirandaanddmelanogastertwospecieswithdifferentcurrenteffectivepopulationsizes