Cargando…

Pulmonary response to intratracheal instillation of ultrafine versus fine titanium dioxide: role of particle surface area

BACKGROUND: The production and use of nanoparticles is growing rapidly due to the unique physical and chemical properties associated with their nano size and large surface area. Since nanoparticles have unique physicochemical properties, their bioactivity upon exposure to workers or consumers is of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sager, Tina M, Kommineni, C, Castranova, Vincent
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2633346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19046442
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-8977-5-17
_version_ 1782164108634750976
author Sager, Tina M
Kommineni, C
Castranova, Vincent
author_facet Sager, Tina M
Kommineni, C
Castranova, Vincent
author_sort Sager, Tina M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The production and use of nanoparticles is growing rapidly due to the unique physical and chemical properties associated with their nano size and large surface area. Since nanoparticles have unique physicochemical properties, their bioactivity upon exposure to workers or consumers is of interest. In this study, the issue of what dose metric (mass dose versus surface area dose) is appropriate for toxicological studies has been addressed. Rats were exposed by intratracheal instillation to various doses of ultrafine or fine TiO(2). At 1, 7, or 42 days post-exposure, inflammatory and cytotoxic potential of each particle type was compared on both a mass dosage (mg/rat) as well as an equal surface area dosage (cm(2 )of particles per cm(2 )of alveolar epithelium) basis. RESULTS: The findings of the study show that on a mass basis the ultrafine particles caused significantly more inflammation and were significantly more cytotoxic than the fine sized particles. However, when doses were equalized based on surface area of particles delivered, the ultrafine particles were only slightly more inflammogenic and cytotoxic when compared to the fine sized particles. Lung burden data indicate that ultrafine TiO(2 )appears to migrate to the interstitium to a much greater extent than fine TiO(2). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that surface area of particles may be a more appropriate dose metric for pulmonary toxicity studies than mass of particles.
format Text
id pubmed-2633346
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26333462009-01-31 Pulmonary response to intratracheal instillation of ultrafine versus fine titanium dioxide: role of particle surface area Sager, Tina M Kommineni, C Castranova, Vincent Part Fibre Toxicol Research BACKGROUND: The production and use of nanoparticles is growing rapidly due to the unique physical and chemical properties associated with their nano size and large surface area. Since nanoparticles have unique physicochemical properties, their bioactivity upon exposure to workers or consumers is of interest. In this study, the issue of what dose metric (mass dose versus surface area dose) is appropriate for toxicological studies has been addressed. Rats were exposed by intratracheal instillation to various doses of ultrafine or fine TiO(2). At 1, 7, or 42 days post-exposure, inflammatory and cytotoxic potential of each particle type was compared on both a mass dosage (mg/rat) as well as an equal surface area dosage (cm(2 )of particles per cm(2 )of alveolar epithelium) basis. RESULTS: The findings of the study show that on a mass basis the ultrafine particles caused significantly more inflammation and were significantly more cytotoxic than the fine sized particles. However, when doses were equalized based on surface area of particles delivered, the ultrafine particles were only slightly more inflammogenic and cytotoxic when compared to the fine sized particles. Lung burden data indicate that ultrafine TiO(2 )appears to migrate to the interstitium to a much greater extent than fine TiO(2). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that surface area of particles may be a more appropriate dose metric for pulmonary toxicity studies than mass of particles. BioMed Central 2008-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2633346/ /pubmed/19046442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-8977-5-17 Text en Copyright © 2008 Sager et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Sager, Tina M
Kommineni, C
Castranova, Vincent
Pulmonary response to intratracheal instillation of ultrafine versus fine titanium dioxide: role of particle surface area
title Pulmonary response to intratracheal instillation of ultrafine versus fine titanium dioxide: role of particle surface area
title_full Pulmonary response to intratracheal instillation of ultrafine versus fine titanium dioxide: role of particle surface area
title_fullStr Pulmonary response to intratracheal instillation of ultrafine versus fine titanium dioxide: role of particle surface area
title_full_unstemmed Pulmonary response to intratracheal instillation of ultrafine versus fine titanium dioxide: role of particle surface area
title_short Pulmonary response to intratracheal instillation of ultrafine versus fine titanium dioxide: role of particle surface area
title_sort pulmonary response to intratracheal instillation of ultrafine versus fine titanium dioxide: role of particle surface area
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2633346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19046442
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-8977-5-17
work_keys_str_mv AT sagertinam pulmonaryresponsetointratrachealinstillationofultrafineversusfinetitaniumdioxideroleofparticlesurfacearea
AT komminenic pulmonaryresponsetointratrachealinstillationofultrafineversusfinetitaniumdioxideroleofparticlesurfacearea
AT castranovavincent pulmonaryresponsetointratrachealinstillationofultrafineversusfinetitaniumdioxideroleofparticlesurfacearea