Cargando…
Paclitaxel and carboplatin vs gemcitabine and vinorelbine in patients with adeno- or undifferentiated carcinoma of unknown primary: a randomised prospective phase II trial
Platinum/taxane combinations are widely used in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP), yielding response rates of 30% and median overall survival of 9–11 months in selected patients. Yet these combinations have not been subject to a randomised trial to overcome selection bias, a major pro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2634671/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19066607 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604818 |
_version_ | 1782164140154945536 |
---|---|
author | Huebner, G Link, H Kohne, C H Stahl, M Kretzschmar, A Steinbach, S Folprecht, G Bernhard, H Al-Batran, S E Schoffski, P Burkart, C Kullmann, F Otremba, B Menges, M Hoffmann, M Kaiser, U Aldaoud, A Jahn, A |
author_facet | Huebner, G Link, H Kohne, C H Stahl, M Kretzschmar, A Steinbach, S Folprecht, G Bernhard, H Al-Batran, S E Schoffski, P Burkart, C Kullmann, F Otremba, B Menges, M Hoffmann, M Kaiser, U Aldaoud, A Jahn, A |
author_sort | Huebner, G |
collection | PubMed |
description | Platinum/taxane combinations are widely used in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP), yielding response rates of 30% and median overall survival of 9–11 months in selected patients. Yet these combinations have not been subject to a randomised trial to overcome selection bias, a major problem in CUP. We randomised 92 patients to either paclitaxel/carboplatin (arm A) or the non-platinum non-taxane regimen gemcitabine/vinorelbine (arm B). The primary endpoint was rate of practicability as defined: application of ⩾2 cycles of therapy (1) with a maximal delay of 1 week (2) and survival of ⩾8 months (3). Practicability was shown in 52.4% (95% CI 36–68%) in arm A and in 42.2% (95% CI 28–58%) in arm B, respectively. The median overall survival, 1-year survival -rate and response rate of patients treated in arm A was 11.0 months, 38, and 23.8%, arm B 7.0 months, 29, and 20%. In conclusion, the paclitaxel/carboplatin regimen showed clinically meaningful activity in this randomised trial (Clinical trial registration number 219, ‘Deutsches KrebsStudienRegister’, German Cancer Society.) |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2634671 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26346712010-01-13 Paclitaxel and carboplatin vs gemcitabine and vinorelbine in patients with adeno- or undifferentiated carcinoma of unknown primary: a randomised prospective phase II trial Huebner, G Link, H Kohne, C H Stahl, M Kretzschmar, A Steinbach, S Folprecht, G Bernhard, H Al-Batran, S E Schoffski, P Burkart, C Kullmann, F Otremba, B Menges, M Hoffmann, M Kaiser, U Aldaoud, A Jahn, A Br J Cancer Clinical Study Platinum/taxane combinations are widely used in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP), yielding response rates of 30% and median overall survival of 9–11 months in selected patients. Yet these combinations have not been subject to a randomised trial to overcome selection bias, a major problem in CUP. We randomised 92 patients to either paclitaxel/carboplatin (arm A) or the non-platinum non-taxane regimen gemcitabine/vinorelbine (arm B). The primary endpoint was rate of practicability as defined: application of ⩾2 cycles of therapy (1) with a maximal delay of 1 week (2) and survival of ⩾8 months (3). Practicability was shown in 52.4% (95% CI 36–68%) in arm A and in 42.2% (95% CI 28–58%) in arm B, respectively. The median overall survival, 1-year survival -rate and response rate of patients treated in arm A was 11.0 months, 38, and 23.8%, arm B 7.0 months, 29, and 20%. In conclusion, the paclitaxel/carboplatin regimen showed clinically meaningful activity in this randomised trial (Clinical trial registration number 219, ‘Deutsches KrebsStudienRegister’, German Cancer Society.) Nature Publishing Group 2009-01-13 2008-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2634671/ /pubmed/19066607 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604818 Text en Copyright © 2009 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Huebner, G Link, H Kohne, C H Stahl, M Kretzschmar, A Steinbach, S Folprecht, G Bernhard, H Al-Batran, S E Schoffski, P Burkart, C Kullmann, F Otremba, B Menges, M Hoffmann, M Kaiser, U Aldaoud, A Jahn, A Paclitaxel and carboplatin vs gemcitabine and vinorelbine in patients with adeno- or undifferentiated carcinoma of unknown primary: a randomised prospective phase II trial |
title | Paclitaxel and carboplatin vs gemcitabine and vinorelbine in patients with adeno- or undifferentiated carcinoma of unknown primary: a randomised prospective phase II trial |
title_full | Paclitaxel and carboplatin vs gemcitabine and vinorelbine in patients with adeno- or undifferentiated carcinoma of unknown primary: a randomised prospective phase II trial |
title_fullStr | Paclitaxel and carboplatin vs gemcitabine and vinorelbine in patients with adeno- or undifferentiated carcinoma of unknown primary: a randomised prospective phase II trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Paclitaxel and carboplatin vs gemcitabine and vinorelbine in patients with adeno- or undifferentiated carcinoma of unknown primary: a randomised prospective phase II trial |
title_short | Paclitaxel and carboplatin vs gemcitabine and vinorelbine in patients with adeno- or undifferentiated carcinoma of unknown primary: a randomised prospective phase II trial |
title_sort | paclitaxel and carboplatin vs gemcitabine and vinorelbine in patients with adeno- or undifferentiated carcinoma of unknown primary: a randomised prospective phase ii trial |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2634671/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19066607 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604818 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huebnerg paclitaxelandcarboplatinvsgemcitabineandvinorelbineinpatientswithadenoorundifferentiatedcarcinomaofunknownprimaryarandomisedprospectivephaseiitrial AT linkh paclitaxelandcarboplatinvsgemcitabineandvinorelbineinpatientswithadenoorundifferentiatedcarcinomaofunknownprimaryarandomisedprospectivephaseiitrial AT kohnech paclitaxelandcarboplatinvsgemcitabineandvinorelbineinpatientswithadenoorundifferentiatedcarcinomaofunknownprimaryarandomisedprospectivephaseiitrial AT stahlm paclitaxelandcarboplatinvsgemcitabineandvinorelbineinpatientswithadenoorundifferentiatedcarcinomaofunknownprimaryarandomisedprospectivephaseiitrial AT kretzschmara paclitaxelandcarboplatinvsgemcitabineandvinorelbineinpatientswithadenoorundifferentiatedcarcinomaofunknownprimaryarandomisedprospectivephaseiitrial AT steinbachs paclitaxelandcarboplatinvsgemcitabineandvinorelbineinpatientswithadenoorundifferentiatedcarcinomaofunknownprimaryarandomisedprospectivephaseiitrial AT folprechtg paclitaxelandcarboplatinvsgemcitabineandvinorelbineinpatientswithadenoorundifferentiatedcarcinomaofunknownprimaryarandomisedprospectivephaseiitrial AT bernhardh paclitaxelandcarboplatinvsgemcitabineandvinorelbineinpatientswithadenoorundifferentiatedcarcinomaofunknownprimaryarandomisedprospectivephaseiitrial AT albatranse paclitaxelandcarboplatinvsgemcitabineandvinorelbineinpatientswithadenoorundifferentiatedcarcinomaofunknownprimaryarandomisedprospectivephaseiitrial AT schoffskip paclitaxelandcarboplatinvsgemcitabineandvinorelbineinpatientswithadenoorundifferentiatedcarcinomaofunknownprimaryarandomisedprospectivephaseiitrial AT burkartc paclitaxelandcarboplatinvsgemcitabineandvinorelbineinpatientswithadenoorundifferentiatedcarcinomaofunknownprimaryarandomisedprospectivephaseiitrial AT kullmannf paclitaxelandcarboplatinvsgemcitabineandvinorelbineinpatientswithadenoorundifferentiatedcarcinomaofunknownprimaryarandomisedprospectivephaseiitrial AT otrembab paclitaxelandcarboplatinvsgemcitabineandvinorelbineinpatientswithadenoorundifferentiatedcarcinomaofunknownprimaryarandomisedprospectivephaseiitrial AT mengesm paclitaxelandcarboplatinvsgemcitabineandvinorelbineinpatientswithadenoorundifferentiatedcarcinomaofunknownprimaryarandomisedprospectivephaseiitrial AT hoffmannm paclitaxelandcarboplatinvsgemcitabineandvinorelbineinpatientswithadenoorundifferentiatedcarcinomaofunknownprimaryarandomisedprospectivephaseiitrial AT kaiseru paclitaxelandcarboplatinvsgemcitabineandvinorelbineinpatientswithadenoorundifferentiatedcarcinomaofunknownprimaryarandomisedprospectivephaseiitrial AT aldaouda paclitaxelandcarboplatinvsgemcitabineandvinorelbineinpatientswithadenoorundifferentiatedcarcinomaofunknownprimaryarandomisedprospectivephaseiitrial AT jahna paclitaxelandcarboplatinvsgemcitabineandvinorelbineinpatientswithadenoorundifferentiatedcarcinomaofunknownprimaryarandomisedprospectivephaseiitrial |