Cargando…

Paclitaxel and carboplatin vs gemcitabine and vinorelbine in patients with adeno- or undifferentiated carcinoma of unknown primary: a randomised prospective phase II trial

Platinum/taxane combinations are widely used in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP), yielding response rates of 30% and median overall survival of 9–11 months in selected patients. Yet these combinations have not been subject to a randomised trial to overcome selection bias, a major pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huebner, G, Link, H, Kohne, C H, Stahl, M, Kretzschmar, A, Steinbach, S, Folprecht, G, Bernhard, H, Al-Batran, S E, Schoffski, P, Burkart, C, Kullmann, F, Otremba, B, Menges, M, Hoffmann, M, Kaiser, U, Aldaoud, A, Jahn, A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2634671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19066607
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604818
_version_ 1782164140154945536
author Huebner, G
Link, H
Kohne, C H
Stahl, M
Kretzschmar, A
Steinbach, S
Folprecht, G
Bernhard, H
Al-Batran, S E
Schoffski, P
Burkart, C
Kullmann, F
Otremba, B
Menges, M
Hoffmann, M
Kaiser, U
Aldaoud, A
Jahn, A
author_facet Huebner, G
Link, H
Kohne, C H
Stahl, M
Kretzschmar, A
Steinbach, S
Folprecht, G
Bernhard, H
Al-Batran, S E
Schoffski, P
Burkart, C
Kullmann, F
Otremba, B
Menges, M
Hoffmann, M
Kaiser, U
Aldaoud, A
Jahn, A
author_sort Huebner, G
collection PubMed
description Platinum/taxane combinations are widely used in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP), yielding response rates of 30% and median overall survival of 9–11 months in selected patients. Yet these combinations have not been subject to a randomised trial to overcome selection bias, a major problem in CUP. We randomised 92 patients to either paclitaxel/carboplatin (arm A) or the non-platinum non-taxane regimen gemcitabine/vinorelbine (arm B). The primary endpoint was rate of practicability as defined: application of ⩾2 cycles of therapy (1) with a maximal delay of 1 week (2) and survival of ⩾8 months (3). Practicability was shown in 52.4% (95% CI 36–68%) in arm A and in 42.2% (95% CI 28–58%) in arm B, respectively. The median overall survival, 1-year survival -rate and response rate of patients treated in arm A was 11.0 months, 38, and 23.8%, arm B 7.0 months, 29, and 20%. In conclusion, the paclitaxel/carboplatin regimen showed clinically meaningful activity in this randomised trial (Clinical trial registration number 219, ‘Deutsches KrebsStudienRegister’, German Cancer Society.)
format Text
id pubmed-2634671
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26346712010-01-13 Paclitaxel and carboplatin vs gemcitabine and vinorelbine in patients with adeno- or undifferentiated carcinoma of unknown primary: a randomised prospective phase II trial Huebner, G Link, H Kohne, C H Stahl, M Kretzschmar, A Steinbach, S Folprecht, G Bernhard, H Al-Batran, S E Schoffski, P Burkart, C Kullmann, F Otremba, B Menges, M Hoffmann, M Kaiser, U Aldaoud, A Jahn, A Br J Cancer Clinical Study Platinum/taxane combinations are widely used in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP), yielding response rates of 30% and median overall survival of 9–11 months in selected patients. Yet these combinations have not been subject to a randomised trial to overcome selection bias, a major problem in CUP. We randomised 92 patients to either paclitaxel/carboplatin (arm A) or the non-platinum non-taxane regimen gemcitabine/vinorelbine (arm B). The primary endpoint was rate of practicability as defined: application of ⩾2 cycles of therapy (1) with a maximal delay of 1 week (2) and survival of ⩾8 months (3). Practicability was shown in 52.4% (95% CI 36–68%) in arm A and in 42.2% (95% CI 28–58%) in arm B, respectively. The median overall survival, 1-year survival -rate and response rate of patients treated in arm A was 11.0 months, 38, and 23.8%, arm B 7.0 months, 29, and 20%. In conclusion, the paclitaxel/carboplatin regimen showed clinically meaningful activity in this randomised trial (Clinical trial registration number 219, ‘Deutsches KrebsStudienRegister’, German Cancer Society.) Nature Publishing Group 2009-01-13 2008-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2634671/ /pubmed/19066607 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604818 Text en Copyright © 2009 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Huebner, G
Link, H
Kohne, C H
Stahl, M
Kretzschmar, A
Steinbach, S
Folprecht, G
Bernhard, H
Al-Batran, S E
Schoffski, P
Burkart, C
Kullmann, F
Otremba, B
Menges, M
Hoffmann, M
Kaiser, U
Aldaoud, A
Jahn, A
Paclitaxel and carboplatin vs gemcitabine and vinorelbine in patients with adeno- or undifferentiated carcinoma of unknown primary: a randomised prospective phase II trial
title Paclitaxel and carboplatin vs gemcitabine and vinorelbine in patients with adeno- or undifferentiated carcinoma of unknown primary: a randomised prospective phase II trial
title_full Paclitaxel and carboplatin vs gemcitabine and vinorelbine in patients with adeno- or undifferentiated carcinoma of unknown primary: a randomised prospective phase II trial
title_fullStr Paclitaxel and carboplatin vs gemcitabine and vinorelbine in patients with adeno- or undifferentiated carcinoma of unknown primary: a randomised prospective phase II trial
title_full_unstemmed Paclitaxel and carboplatin vs gemcitabine and vinorelbine in patients with adeno- or undifferentiated carcinoma of unknown primary: a randomised prospective phase II trial
title_short Paclitaxel and carboplatin vs gemcitabine and vinorelbine in patients with adeno- or undifferentiated carcinoma of unknown primary: a randomised prospective phase II trial
title_sort paclitaxel and carboplatin vs gemcitabine and vinorelbine in patients with adeno- or undifferentiated carcinoma of unknown primary: a randomised prospective phase ii trial
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2634671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19066607
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604818
work_keys_str_mv AT huebnerg paclitaxelandcarboplatinvsgemcitabineandvinorelbineinpatientswithadenoorundifferentiatedcarcinomaofunknownprimaryarandomisedprospectivephaseiitrial
AT linkh paclitaxelandcarboplatinvsgemcitabineandvinorelbineinpatientswithadenoorundifferentiatedcarcinomaofunknownprimaryarandomisedprospectivephaseiitrial
AT kohnech paclitaxelandcarboplatinvsgemcitabineandvinorelbineinpatientswithadenoorundifferentiatedcarcinomaofunknownprimaryarandomisedprospectivephaseiitrial
AT stahlm paclitaxelandcarboplatinvsgemcitabineandvinorelbineinpatientswithadenoorundifferentiatedcarcinomaofunknownprimaryarandomisedprospectivephaseiitrial
AT kretzschmara paclitaxelandcarboplatinvsgemcitabineandvinorelbineinpatientswithadenoorundifferentiatedcarcinomaofunknownprimaryarandomisedprospectivephaseiitrial
AT steinbachs paclitaxelandcarboplatinvsgemcitabineandvinorelbineinpatientswithadenoorundifferentiatedcarcinomaofunknownprimaryarandomisedprospectivephaseiitrial
AT folprechtg paclitaxelandcarboplatinvsgemcitabineandvinorelbineinpatientswithadenoorundifferentiatedcarcinomaofunknownprimaryarandomisedprospectivephaseiitrial
AT bernhardh paclitaxelandcarboplatinvsgemcitabineandvinorelbineinpatientswithadenoorundifferentiatedcarcinomaofunknownprimaryarandomisedprospectivephaseiitrial
AT albatranse paclitaxelandcarboplatinvsgemcitabineandvinorelbineinpatientswithadenoorundifferentiatedcarcinomaofunknownprimaryarandomisedprospectivephaseiitrial
AT schoffskip paclitaxelandcarboplatinvsgemcitabineandvinorelbineinpatientswithadenoorundifferentiatedcarcinomaofunknownprimaryarandomisedprospectivephaseiitrial
AT burkartc paclitaxelandcarboplatinvsgemcitabineandvinorelbineinpatientswithadenoorundifferentiatedcarcinomaofunknownprimaryarandomisedprospectivephaseiitrial
AT kullmannf paclitaxelandcarboplatinvsgemcitabineandvinorelbineinpatientswithadenoorundifferentiatedcarcinomaofunknownprimaryarandomisedprospectivephaseiitrial
AT otrembab paclitaxelandcarboplatinvsgemcitabineandvinorelbineinpatientswithadenoorundifferentiatedcarcinomaofunknownprimaryarandomisedprospectivephaseiitrial
AT mengesm paclitaxelandcarboplatinvsgemcitabineandvinorelbineinpatientswithadenoorundifferentiatedcarcinomaofunknownprimaryarandomisedprospectivephaseiitrial
AT hoffmannm paclitaxelandcarboplatinvsgemcitabineandvinorelbineinpatientswithadenoorundifferentiatedcarcinomaofunknownprimaryarandomisedprospectivephaseiitrial
AT kaiseru paclitaxelandcarboplatinvsgemcitabineandvinorelbineinpatientswithadenoorundifferentiatedcarcinomaofunknownprimaryarandomisedprospectivephaseiitrial
AT aldaouda paclitaxelandcarboplatinvsgemcitabineandvinorelbineinpatientswithadenoorundifferentiatedcarcinomaofunknownprimaryarandomisedprospectivephaseiitrial
AT jahna paclitaxelandcarboplatinvsgemcitabineandvinorelbineinpatientswithadenoorundifferentiatedcarcinomaofunknownprimaryarandomisedprospectivephaseiitrial