Cargando…
What Should Be Done To Tackle Ghostwriting in the Medical Literature?
Background to the debate: Ghostwriting occurs when someone makes substantial contributions to a manuscript without attribution or disclosure. It is considered bad publication practice in the medical sciences, and some argue it is scientific misconduct. At its extreme, medical ghostwriting involves p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2634793/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19192943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000023 |
_version_ | 1782164163635707904 |
---|---|
author | Gøtzsche, Peter C Kassirer, Jerome P Woolley, Karen L Wager, Elizabeth Jacobs, Adam Gertel, Art Hamilton, Cindy |
author_facet | Gøtzsche, Peter C Kassirer, Jerome P Woolley, Karen L Wager, Elizabeth Jacobs, Adam Gertel, Art Hamilton, Cindy |
author_sort | Gøtzsche, Peter C |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background to the debate: Ghostwriting occurs when someone makes substantial contributions to a manuscript without attribution or disclosure. It is considered bad publication practice in the medical sciences, and some argue it is scientific misconduct. At its extreme, medical ghostwriting involves pharmaceutical companies hiring professional writers to produce papers promoting their products but hiding those contributions and instead naming academic physicians or scientists as the authors. To improve transparency, many editors' associations and journals allow professional medical writers to contribute to the writing of papers without being listed as authors provided their role is acknowledged. This debate examines how best to tackle ghostwriting in the medical literature from the perspectives of a researcher, an editor, and the professional medical writer. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2634793 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26347932009-02-24 What Should Be Done To Tackle Ghostwriting in the Medical Literature? Gøtzsche, Peter C Kassirer, Jerome P Woolley, Karen L Wager, Elizabeth Jacobs, Adam Gertel, Art Hamilton, Cindy PLoS Med The PLoS Medicine Debate Background to the debate: Ghostwriting occurs when someone makes substantial contributions to a manuscript without attribution or disclosure. It is considered bad publication practice in the medical sciences, and some argue it is scientific misconduct. At its extreme, medical ghostwriting involves pharmaceutical companies hiring professional writers to produce papers promoting their products but hiding those contributions and instead naming academic physicians or scientists as the authors. To improve transparency, many editors' associations and journals allow professional medical writers to contribute to the writing of papers without being listed as authors provided their role is acknowledged. This debate examines how best to tackle ghostwriting in the medical literature from the perspectives of a researcher, an editor, and the professional medical writer. Public Library of Science 2009-02 2009-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2634793/ /pubmed/19192943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000023 Text en © 2009 Gøtzsche et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | The PLoS Medicine Debate Gøtzsche, Peter C Kassirer, Jerome P Woolley, Karen L Wager, Elizabeth Jacobs, Adam Gertel, Art Hamilton, Cindy What Should Be Done To Tackle Ghostwriting in the Medical Literature? |
title | What Should Be Done To Tackle Ghostwriting in the Medical Literature? |
title_full | What Should Be Done To Tackle Ghostwriting in the Medical Literature? |
title_fullStr | What Should Be Done To Tackle Ghostwriting in the Medical Literature? |
title_full_unstemmed | What Should Be Done To Tackle Ghostwriting in the Medical Literature? |
title_short | What Should Be Done To Tackle Ghostwriting in the Medical Literature? |
title_sort | what should be done to tackle ghostwriting in the medical literature? |
topic | The PLoS Medicine Debate |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2634793/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19192943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000023 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gøtzschepeterc whatshouldbedonetotackleghostwritinginthemedicalliterature AT kassirerjeromep whatshouldbedonetotackleghostwritinginthemedicalliterature AT woolleykarenl whatshouldbedonetotackleghostwritinginthemedicalliterature AT wagerelizabeth whatshouldbedonetotackleghostwritinginthemedicalliterature AT jacobsadam whatshouldbedonetotackleghostwritinginthemedicalliterature AT gertelart whatshouldbedonetotackleghostwritinginthemedicalliterature AT hamiltoncindy whatshouldbedonetotackleghostwritinginthemedicalliterature |