Cargando…

Comparison of broad range 16S rDNA PCR and conventional blood culture for diagnosis of sepsis in the newborn: a case control study

BACKGROUND: Early onset bacterial sepsis is a feared complication of the newborn. A large proportion of infants admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) for suspected sepsis receive treatment with potent systemic antibiotics while a diagnostic workup is in progress. The gold standard for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reier-Nilsen, Tonje, Farstad, Teresa, Nakstad, Britt, Lauvrak, Vigdis, Steinbakk, Martin
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2635358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19152691
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-9-5
_version_ 1782164175533899776
author Reier-Nilsen, Tonje
Farstad, Teresa
Nakstad, Britt
Lauvrak, Vigdis
Steinbakk, Martin
author_facet Reier-Nilsen, Tonje
Farstad, Teresa
Nakstad, Britt
Lauvrak, Vigdis
Steinbakk, Martin
author_sort Reier-Nilsen, Tonje
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Early onset bacterial sepsis is a feared complication of the newborn. A large proportion of infants admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) for suspected sepsis receive treatment with potent systemic antibiotics while a diagnostic workup is in progress. The gold standard for detecting bacterial sepsis is blood culture. However, as pathogens in blood cultures are only detected in approximately 25% of patients, the sensitivity of blood culture is suspected to be low. Therefore, the diagnosis of sepsis is often based on the development of clinical signs, in combination with laboratory tests such as a rise in C – reactive protein (CRP). Molecular assays for the detection of bacterial DNA in the blood represent possible new diagnostic tools for early identification of a bacterial cause. METHODS: A broad range 16S rDNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) without preincubation was compared to conventional diagnostic work up for clinical sepsis, including BACTEC blood culture, for early determination of bacterial sepsis in the newborn. In addition, the relationship between known risk factors, clinical signs, and laboratory parameters considered in clinical sepsis in the newborn were explored. RESULTS: Forty-eight infants with suspected sepsis were included in this study. Thirty-one patients were diagnosed with sepsis, only 6 of these had a positive blood culture. 16S rDNA PCR analysis of blinded blood samples from the 48 infants revealed 10 samples positive for the presence of bacterial DNA. PCR failed to be positive in 2 samples from blood culture positive infants, and was positive in 1 sample where a diagnosis of a non-septic condition was established. Compared to blood culture the diagnosis of bacterial proven sepsis by PCR revealed a 66.7% sensitivity, 87.5% specificity, 95.4% positive and 75% negative predictive value. PCR combined with blood culture revealed bacteria in 35.1% of the patients diagnosed with sepsis. Irritability and feeding difficulties were the clinical signs most often observed in sepsis. CRP increased in the presence of bacterial infection. CONCLUSION: There is a need for PCR as a method to quickly point out the infants with sepsis. However, uncertainty about a bacterial cause of sepsis was not reduced by the PCR result, reflecting that methodological improvements are required in order for DNA detection to replace or supplement traditional blood culture in diagnosis of bacterial sepsis.
format Text
id pubmed-2635358
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26353582009-02-04 Comparison of broad range 16S rDNA PCR and conventional blood culture for diagnosis of sepsis in the newborn: a case control study Reier-Nilsen, Tonje Farstad, Teresa Nakstad, Britt Lauvrak, Vigdis Steinbakk, Martin BMC Pediatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Early onset bacterial sepsis is a feared complication of the newborn. A large proportion of infants admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) for suspected sepsis receive treatment with potent systemic antibiotics while a diagnostic workup is in progress. The gold standard for detecting bacterial sepsis is blood culture. However, as pathogens in blood cultures are only detected in approximately 25% of patients, the sensitivity of blood culture is suspected to be low. Therefore, the diagnosis of sepsis is often based on the development of clinical signs, in combination with laboratory tests such as a rise in C – reactive protein (CRP). Molecular assays for the detection of bacterial DNA in the blood represent possible new diagnostic tools for early identification of a bacterial cause. METHODS: A broad range 16S rDNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) without preincubation was compared to conventional diagnostic work up for clinical sepsis, including BACTEC blood culture, for early determination of bacterial sepsis in the newborn. In addition, the relationship between known risk factors, clinical signs, and laboratory parameters considered in clinical sepsis in the newborn were explored. RESULTS: Forty-eight infants with suspected sepsis were included in this study. Thirty-one patients were diagnosed with sepsis, only 6 of these had a positive blood culture. 16S rDNA PCR analysis of blinded blood samples from the 48 infants revealed 10 samples positive for the presence of bacterial DNA. PCR failed to be positive in 2 samples from blood culture positive infants, and was positive in 1 sample where a diagnosis of a non-septic condition was established. Compared to blood culture the diagnosis of bacterial proven sepsis by PCR revealed a 66.7% sensitivity, 87.5% specificity, 95.4% positive and 75% negative predictive value. PCR combined with blood culture revealed bacteria in 35.1% of the patients diagnosed with sepsis. Irritability and feeding difficulties were the clinical signs most often observed in sepsis. CRP increased in the presence of bacterial infection. CONCLUSION: There is a need for PCR as a method to quickly point out the infants with sepsis. However, uncertainty about a bacterial cause of sepsis was not reduced by the PCR result, reflecting that methodological improvements are required in order for DNA detection to replace or supplement traditional blood culture in diagnosis of bacterial sepsis. BioMed Central 2009-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC2635358/ /pubmed/19152691 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-9-5 Text en Copyright © 2009 Reier-Nilsen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Reier-Nilsen, Tonje
Farstad, Teresa
Nakstad, Britt
Lauvrak, Vigdis
Steinbakk, Martin
Comparison of broad range 16S rDNA PCR and conventional blood culture for diagnosis of sepsis in the newborn: a case control study
title Comparison of broad range 16S rDNA PCR and conventional blood culture for diagnosis of sepsis in the newborn: a case control study
title_full Comparison of broad range 16S rDNA PCR and conventional blood culture for diagnosis of sepsis in the newborn: a case control study
title_fullStr Comparison of broad range 16S rDNA PCR and conventional blood culture for diagnosis of sepsis in the newborn: a case control study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of broad range 16S rDNA PCR and conventional blood culture for diagnosis of sepsis in the newborn: a case control study
title_short Comparison of broad range 16S rDNA PCR and conventional blood culture for diagnosis of sepsis in the newborn: a case control study
title_sort comparison of broad range 16s rdna pcr and conventional blood culture for diagnosis of sepsis in the newborn: a case control study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2635358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19152691
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-9-5
work_keys_str_mv AT reiernilsentonje comparisonofbroadrange16srdnapcrandconventionalbloodculturefordiagnosisofsepsisinthenewbornacasecontrolstudy
AT farstadteresa comparisonofbroadrange16srdnapcrandconventionalbloodculturefordiagnosisofsepsisinthenewbornacasecontrolstudy
AT nakstadbritt comparisonofbroadrange16srdnapcrandconventionalbloodculturefordiagnosisofsepsisinthenewbornacasecontrolstudy
AT lauvrakvigdis comparisonofbroadrange16srdnapcrandconventionalbloodculturefordiagnosisofsepsisinthenewbornacasecontrolstudy
AT steinbakkmartin comparisonofbroadrange16srdnapcrandconventionalbloodculturefordiagnosisofsepsisinthenewbornacasecontrolstudy