Cargando…

Contact Inhibition of Locomotion in vivo controls neural crest directional migration

Contact Inhibition of Locomotion was discovered by Abercrombie more than 50 years ago to describe the behaviour of fibroblast cells confronting each other in vitro, where they retract their protrusions and change direction upon contact1,2. Its failure was suggested to contribute to malignant invasio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carmona-Fontaine, Carlos, Matthews, Helen K., Kuriyama, Sei, Moreno, Mauricio, Dunn, Graham A., Parsons, Maddy, Stern, Claudio D., Mayor, Roberto
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2635562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19078960
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature07441
_version_ 1782164190324064256
author Carmona-Fontaine, Carlos
Matthews, Helen K.
Kuriyama, Sei
Moreno, Mauricio
Dunn, Graham A.
Parsons, Maddy
Stern, Claudio D.
Mayor, Roberto
author_facet Carmona-Fontaine, Carlos
Matthews, Helen K.
Kuriyama, Sei
Moreno, Mauricio
Dunn, Graham A.
Parsons, Maddy
Stern, Claudio D.
Mayor, Roberto
author_sort Carmona-Fontaine, Carlos
collection PubMed
description Contact Inhibition of Locomotion was discovered by Abercrombie more than 50 years ago to describe the behaviour of fibroblast cells confronting each other in vitro, where they retract their protrusions and change direction upon contact1,2. Its failure was suggested to contribute to malignant invasion3-6. However, the molecular basis of Contact Inhibition of Locomotion and whether it also occurs in vivo are still unknown. Here we show that neural crest cells, a highly migratory and multipotent embryonic cell population, whose behaviour has been likened to malignant invasion6-8, exhibit Contact Inhibition of Locomotion both in vivo and in vitro, and that this accounts for their directional migration. When two migrating neural crest cells meet, they stop, collapse their protrusions and change direction. In contrast, when a neural crest cell meets another cell type, it fails to display Contact Inhibition of Locomotion; instead, it invades the other tissue, like metastatic cancer cells3,5,9. We show that inhibition of non-canonical Wnt signalling abolishes both Contact Inhibition of Locomotion and the directionality of neural crest migration. Wnt signalling members localise at the site of cell contact, leading to activation of RhoA in this region. These results provide the first example of Contact Inhibition of Locomotion in vivo, present an explanation for coherent directional migration of group of cells and establish a novel role for non-canonical Wnt signalling.
format Text
id pubmed-2635562
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26355622009-06-18 Contact Inhibition of Locomotion in vivo controls neural crest directional migration Carmona-Fontaine, Carlos Matthews, Helen K. Kuriyama, Sei Moreno, Mauricio Dunn, Graham A. Parsons, Maddy Stern, Claudio D. Mayor, Roberto Nature Article Contact Inhibition of Locomotion was discovered by Abercrombie more than 50 years ago to describe the behaviour of fibroblast cells confronting each other in vitro, where they retract their protrusions and change direction upon contact1,2. Its failure was suggested to contribute to malignant invasion3-6. However, the molecular basis of Contact Inhibition of Locomotion and whether it also occurs in vivo are still unknown. Here we show that neural crest cells, a highly migratory and multipotent embryonic cell population, whose behaviour has been likened to malignant invasion6-8, exhibit Contact Inhibition of Locomotion both in vivo and in vitro, and that this accounts for their directional migration. When two migrating neural crest cells meet, they stop, collapse their protrusions and change direction. In contrast, when a neural crest cell meets another cell type, it fails to display Contact Inhibition of Locomotion; instead, it invades the other tissue, like metastatic cancer cells3,5,9. We show that inhibition of non-canonical Wnt signalling abolishes both Contact Inhibition of Locomotion and the directionality of neural crest migration. Wnt signalling members localise at the site of cell contact, leading to activation of RhoA in this region. These results provide the first example of Contact Inhibition of Locomotion in vivo, present an explanation for coherent directional migration of group of cells and establish a novel role for non-canonical Wnt signalling. 2008-12-10 2008-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC2635562/ /pubmed/19078960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature07441 Text en
spellingShingle Article
Carmona-Fontaine, Carlos
Matthews, Helen K.
Kuriyama, Sei
Moreno, Mauricio
Dunn, Graham A.
Parsons, Maddy
Stern, Claudio D.
Mayor, Roberto
Contact Inhibition of Locomotion in vivo controls neural crest directional migration
title Contact Inhibition of Locomotion in vivo controls neural crest directional migration
title_full Contact Inhibition of Locomotion in vivo controls neural crest directional migration
title_fullStr Contact Inhibition of Locomotion in vivo controls neural crest directional migration
title_full_unstemmed Contact Inhibition of Locomotion in vivo controls neural crest directional migration
title_short Contact Inhibition of Locomotion in vivo controls neural crest directional migration
title_sort contact inhibition of locomotion in vivo controls neural crest directional migration
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2635562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19078960
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature07441
work_keys_str_mv AT carmonafontainecarlos contactinhibitionoflocomotioninvivocontrolsneuralcrestdirectionalmigration
AT matthewshelenk contactinhibitionoflocomotioninvivocontrolsneuralcrestdirectionalmigration
AT kuriyamasei contactinhibitionoflocomotioninvivocontrolsneuralcrestdirectionalmigration
AT morenomauricio contactinhibitionoflocomotioninvivocontrolsneuralcrestdirectionalmigration
AT dunngrahama contactinhibitionoflocomotioninvivocontrolsneuralcrestdirectionalmigration
AT parsonsmaddy contactinhibitionoflocomotioninvivocontrolsneuralcrestdirectionalmigration
AT sternclaudiod contactinhibitionoflocomotioninvivocontrolsneuralcrestdirectionalmigration
AT mayorroberto contactinhibitionoflocomotioninvivocontrolsneuralcrestdirectionalmigration