Cargando…

Chromatid recommensuration after segmental duplication

BACKGROUND: Midsegment duplication (dup) of chromatid arms may be symmetric or asymmetric. It can be argued that every dup should yield a discommensured RC with (a) loss of at least one duplicated unit to the template counterpart and; (b) deletion of all sections of the replicating chromatid arm tha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Jabbour, Mark N
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2637237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19128497
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-4682-6-1
_version_ 1782164339927547904
author Jabbour, Mark N
author_facet Jabbour, Mark N
author_sort Jabbour, Mark N
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Midsegment duplication (dup) of chromatid arms may be symmetric or asymmetric. It can be argued that every dup should yield a discommensured RC with (a) loss of at least one duplicated unit to the template counterpart and; (b) deletion of all sections of the replicating chromatid arm that are distal to both the gap left by the duplicating process and the segment closest to the centromere. HYPOTHESIS: Mechanisms capable of recommensuring the stack of chromatids after topological shifts of duplicated units (dups) are discussed. The mechanics might fail in few cases, which are discussed in terms of statistics and scalability. CONCLUSION: The dynamics of the highly non-linear processes discussed here may be relevant to duplications of smaller (epsilon) subunits such as telomeric units within malignant genomes.
format Text
id pubmed-2637237
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26372372009-02-07 Chromatid recommensuration after segmental duplication Jabbour, Mark N Theor Biol Med Model Research BACKGROUND: Midsegment duplication (dup) of chromatid arms may be symmetric or asymmetric. It can be argued that every dup should yield a discommensured RC with (a) loss of at least one duplicated unit to the template counterpart and; (b) deletion of all sections of the replicating chromatid arm that are distal to both the gap left by the duplicating process and the segment closest to the centromere. HYPOTHESIS: Mechanisms capable of recommensuring the stack of chromatids after topological shifts of duplicated units (dups) are discussed. The mechanics might fail in few cases, which are discussed in terms of statistics and scalability. CONCLUSION: The dynamics of the highly non-linear processes discussed here may be relevant to duplications of smaller (epsilon) subunits such as telomeric units within malignant genomes. BioMed Central 2009-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC2637237/ /pubmed/19128497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-4682-6-1 Text en Copyright © 2009 Jabbour; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Jabbour, Mark N
Chromatid recommensuration after segmental duplication
title Chromatid recommensuration after segmental duplication
title_full Chromatid recommensuration after segmental duplication
title_fullStr Chromatid recommensuration after segmental duplication
title_full_unstemmed Chromatid recommensuration after segmental duplication
title_short Chromatid recommensuration after segmental duplication
title_sort chromatid recommensuration after segmental duplication
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2637237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19128497
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-4682-6-1
work_keys_str_mv AT jabbourmarkn chromatidrecommensurationaftersegmentalduplication