Cargando…

Estimating Influenza Vaccine Efficacy From Challenge and Community-based Study Data

In this paper, the authors provide estimates of 4 measures of vaccine efficacy for live, attenuated and inactivated influenza vaccine based on secondary analysis of 5 experimental influenza challenge studies in seronegative adults and community-based vaccine trials. The 4 vaccine efficacy measures a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Basta, Nicole E., Halloran, M. Elizabeth, Matrajt, Laura, Longini, Ira M.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2638553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18974084
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwn259
_version_ 1782164411719352320
author Basta, Nicole E.
Halloran, M. Elizabeth
Matrajt, Laura
Longini, Ira M.
author_facet Basta, Nicole E.
Halloran, M. Elizabeth
Matrajt, Laura
Longini, Ira M.
author_sort Basta, Nicole E.
collection PubMed
description In this paper, the authors provide estimates of 4 measures of vaccine efficacy for live, attenuated and inactivated influenza vaccine based on secondary analysis of 5 experimental influenza challenge studies in seronegative adults and community-based vaccine trials. The 4 vaccine efficacy measures are for susceptibility (VE(S)), symptomatic illness given infection (VE(P)), infection and illness (VE(SP)), and infectiousness (VE(I)). The authors also propose a combined (VE(C)) measure of the reduction in transmission in the entire population based on all of the above efficacy measures. Live influenza vaccine and inactivated vaccine provided similar protection against laboratory-confirmed infection (for live vaccine: VE(S)  = 41%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 15, 66; for inactivated vaccine: VE(S)  = 43%, 95% CI: 8, 79). Live vaccine had a higher efficacy for illness given infection (VE(P)  = 67%, 95% CI: 24, 100) than inactivated vaccine (VE(P)  = 29%, 95% CI: −19, 76), although the difference was not statistically significant. VE(SP) for the live vaccine was higher than for the inactivated vaccine. VE(I) estimates were particularly low for these influenza vaccines. VE(SP) and VE(C) can remain high for both vaccines, even when VE(I) is relatively low, as long as the other 2 measures of vaccine efficacy are relatively high.
format Text
id pubmed-2638553
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26385532009-02-25 Estimating Influenza Vaccine Efficacy From Challenge and Community-based Study Data Basta, Nicole E. Halloran, M. Elizabeth Matrajt, Laura Longini, Ira M. Am J Epidemiol Commentary In this paper, the authors provide estimates of 4 measures of vaccine efficacy for live, attenuated and inactivated influenza vaccine based on secondary analysis of 5 experimental influenza challenge studies in seronegative adults and community-based vaccine trials. The 4 vaccine efficacy measures are for susceptibility (VE(S)), symptomatic illness given infection (VE(P)), infection and illness (VE(SP)), and infectiousness (VE(I)). The authors also propose a combined (VE(C)) measure of the reduction in transmission in the entire population based on all of the above efficacy measures. Live influenza vaccine and inactivated vaccine provided similar protection against laboratory-confirmed infection (for live vaccine: VE(S)  = 41%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 15, 66; for inactivated vaccine: VE(S)  = 43%, 95% CI: 8, 79). Live vaccine had a higher efficacy for illness given infection (VE(P)  = 67%, 95% CI: 24, 100) than inactivated vaccine (VE(P)  = 29%, 95% CI: −19, 76), although the difference was not statistically significant. VE(SP) for the live vaccine was higher than for the inactivated vaccine. VE(I) estimates were particularly low for these influenza vaccines. VE(SP) and VE(C) can remain high for both vaccines, even when VE(I) is relatively low, as long as the other 2 measures of vaccine efficacy are relatively high. Oxford University Press 2008-12-15 2008-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC2638553/ /pubmed/18974084 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwn259 Text en American Journal of Epidemiology © 2008 The Authors This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Commentary
Basta, Nicole E.
Halloran, M. Elizabeth
Matrajt, Laura
Longini, Ira M.
Estimating Influenza Vaccine Efficacy From Challenge and Community-based Study Data
title Estimating Influenza Vaccine Efficacy From Challenge and Community-based Study Data
title_full Estimating Influenza Vaccine Efficacy From Challenge and Community-based Study Data
title_fullStr Estimating Influenza Vaccine Efficacy From Challenge and Community-based Study Data
title_full_unstemmed Estimating Influenza Vaccine Efficacy From Challenge and Community-based Study Data
title_short Estimating Influenza Vaccine Efficacy From Challenge and Community-based Study Data
title_sort estimating influenza vaccine efficacy from challenge and community-based study data
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2638553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18974084
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwn259
work_keys_str_mv AT bastanicolee estimatinginfluenzavaccineefficacyfromchallengeandcommunitybasedstudydata
AT halloranmelizabeth estimatinginfluenzavaccineefficacyfromchallengeandcommunitybasedstudydata
AT matrajtlaura estimatinginfluenzavaccineefficacyfromchallengeandcommunitybasedstudydata
AT longiniiram estimatinginfluenzavaccineefficacyfromchallengeandcommunitybasedstudydata