Cargando…
Estimating Influenza Vaccine Efficacy From Challenge and Community-based Study Data
In this paper, the authors provide estimates of 4 measures of vaccine efficacy for live, attenuated and inactivated influenza vaccine based on secondary analysis of 5 experimental influenza challenge studies in seronegative adults and community-based vaccine trials. The 4 vaccine efficacy measures a...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2638553/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18974084 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwn259 |
_version_ | 1782164411719352320 |
---|---|
author | Basta, Nicole E. Halloran, M. Elizabeth Matrajt, Laura Longini, Ira M. |
author_facet | Basta, Nicole E. Halloran, M. Elizabeth Matrajt, Laura Longini, Ira M. |
author_sort | Basta, Nicole E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this paper, the authors provide estimates of 4 measures of vaccine efficacy for live, attenuated and inactivated influenza vaccine based on secondary analysis of 5 experimental influenza challenge studies in seronegative adults and community-based vaccine trials. The 4 vaccine efficacy measures are for susceptibility (VE(S)), symptomatic illness given infection (VE(P)), infection and illness (VE(SP)), and infectiousness (VE(I)). The authors also propose a combined (VE(C)) measure of the reduction in transmission in the entire population based on all of the above efficacy measures. Live influenza vaccine and inactivated vaccine provided similar protection against laboratory-confirmed infection (for live vaccine: VE(S) = 41%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 15, 66; for inactivated vaccine: VE(S) = 43%, 95% CI: 8, 79). Live vaccine had a higher efficacy for illness given infection (VE(P) = 67%, 95% CI: 24, 100) than inactivated vaccine (VE(P) = 29%, 95% CI: −19, 76), although the difference was not statistically significant. VE(SP) for the live vaccine was higher than for the inactivated vaccine. VE(I) estimates were particularly low for these influenza vaccines. VE(SP) and VE(C) can remain high for both vaccines, even when VE(I) is relatively low, as long as the other 2 measures of vaccine efficacy are relatively high. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2638553 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26385532009-02-25 Estimating Influenza Vaccine Efficacy From Challenge and Community-based Study Data Basta, Nicole E. Halloran, M. Elizabeth Matrajt, Laura Longini, Ira M. Am J Epidemiol Commentary In this paper, the authors provide estimates of 4 measures of vaccine efficacy for live, attenuated and inactivated influenza vaccine based on secondary analysis of 5 experimental influenza challenge studies in seronegative adults and community-based vaccine trials. The 4 vaccine efficacy measures are for susceptibility (VE(S)), symptomatic illness given infection (VE(P)), infection and illness (VE(SP)), and infectiousness (VE(I)). The authors also propose a combined (VE(C)) measure of the reduction in transmission in the entire population based on all of the above efficacy measures. Live influenza vaccine and inactivated vaccine provided similar protection against laboratory-confirmed infection (for live vaccine: VE(S) = 41%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 15, 66; for inactivated vaccine: VE(S) = 43%, 95% CI: 8, 79). Live vaccine had a higher efficacy for illness given infection (VE(P) = 67%, 95% CI: 24, 100) than inactivated vaccine (VE(P) = 29%, 95% CI: −19, 76), although the difference was not statistically significant. VE(SP) for the live vaccine was higher than for the inactivated vaccine. VE(I) estimates were particularly low for these influenza vaccines. VE(SP) and VE(C) can remain high for both vaccines, even when VE(I) is relatively low, as long as the other 2 measures of vaccine efficacy are relatively high. Oxford University Press 2008-12-15 2008-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC2638553/ /pubmed/18974084 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwn259 Text en American Journal of Epidemiology © 2008 The Authors This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Basta, Nicole E. Halloran, M. Elizabeth Matrajt, Laura Longini, Ira M. Estimating Influenza Vaccine Efficacy From Challenge and Community-based Study Data |
title | Estimating Influenza Vaccine Efficacy From Challenge and Community-based Study Data |
title_full | Estimating Influenza Vaccine Efficacy From Challenge and Community-based Study Data |
title_fullStr | Estimating Influenza Vaccine Efficacy From Challenge and Community-based Study Data |
title_full_unstemmed | Estimating Influenza Vaccine Efficacy From Challenge and Community-based Study Data |
title_short | Estimating Influenza Vaccine Efficacy From Challenge and Community-based Study Data |
title_sort | estimating influenza vaccine efficacy from challenge and community-based study data |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2638553/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18974084 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwn259 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bastanicolee estimatinginfluenzavaccineefficacyfromchallengeandcommunitybasedstudydata AT halloranmelizabeth estimatinginfluenzavaccineefficacyfromchallengeandcommunitybasedstudydata AT matrajtlaura estimatinginfluenzavaccineefficacyfromchallengeandcommunitybasedstudydata AT longiniiram estimatinginfluenzavaccineefficacyfromchallengeandcommunitybasedstudydata |