Cargando…

Feasibility of laparoscopy for small bowel obstruction

BACKGROUND: Adherential pathology is the most common cause of small bowel obstruction. Laparoscopy in small bowel obstruction does not have a clear role yet; surely it doesn't always represent only a therapeutic act, but it is always a diagnostic act, which doesn't interfere with abdominal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Farinella, Eriberto, Cirocchi, Roberto, La Mura, Francesco, Morelli, Umberto, Cattorini, Lorenzo, Delmonaco, Pamela, Migliaccio, Carla, De Sol, Angelo A, Cozzaglio, Luca, Sciannameo, Francesco
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2639545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19152695
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-7922-4-3
_version_ 1782164471254351872
author Farinella, Eriberto
Cirocchi, Roberto
La Mura, Francesco
Morelli, Umberto
Cattorini, Lorenzo
Delmonaco, Pamela
Migliaccio, Carla
De Sol, Angelo A
Cozzaglio, Luca
Sciannameo, Francesco
author_facet Farinella, Eriberto
Cirocchi, Roberto
La Mura, Francesco
Morelli, Umberto
Cattorini, Lorenzo
Delmonaco, Pamela
Migliaccio, Carla
De Sol, Angelo A
Cozzaglio, Luca
Sciannameo, Francesco
author_sort Farinella, Eriberto
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Adherential pathology is the most common cause of small bowel obstruction. Laparoscopy in small bowel obstruction does not have a clear role yet; surely it doesn't always represent only a therapeutic act, but it is always a diagnostic act, which doesn't interfere with abdominal wall integrity. METHODS: We performed a review without any language restrictions considering international literature indexed from 1980 to 2007 in Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library. We analyzed the reference lists of the key manuscripts. We also added a review based on international non-indexed sources. RESULTS: The feasibility of diagnostic laparoscopy is high (60–100%), while that of therapeutic laparoscopy is low (40–88%). The frequency of laparotomic conversions is variable ranging from 0 to 52%, depending on patient selection and surgical skill. The first cause of laparotomic conversion is a difficult exposition and treatment of band adhesions. The incidence of laparotomic conversions is major in patients with anterior peritoneal band adhesions. Other main causes for laparotomic conversion are the presence of bowel necrosis and accidental enterotomies. The predictive factors for successful laparoscopic adhesiolysis are: number of previous laparotomies ≤ 2, non-median previous laparotomy, appendectomy as previous surgical treatment causing adherences, unique band adhesion as phatogenetic mechanism of small bowel obstruction, early laparoscopic management within 24 hours from the onset of symptoms, no signs of peritonitis on physical examination, experience of the surgeon. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic adhesiolysis in small bowel obstruction is feasible but can be convenient only if performed by skilled surgeons in selected patients. The laparoscopic adhesiolysis for small bowel obstruction is satisfactorily carried out when early indicated in patients with a low number of laparotomies resulting in a short hospital stay and a lower postoperative morbidity. Although a higher small bowel obstruction recurrence remains the major postoperative risk of the laparoscopic management of these patients.
format Text
id pubmed-2639545
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26395452009-02-11 Feasibility of laparoscopy for small bowel obstruction Farinella, Eriberto Cirocchi, Roberto La Mura, Francesco Morelli, Umberto Cattorini, Lorenzo Delmonaco, Pamela Migliaccio, Carla De Sol, Angelo A Cozzaglio, Luca Sciannameo, Francesco World J Emerg Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Adherential pathology is the most common cause of small bowel obstruction. Laparoscopy in small bowel obstruction does not have a clear role yet; surely it doesn't always represent only a therapeutic act, but it is always a diagnostic act, which doesn't interfere with abdominal wall integrity. METHODS: We performed a review without any language restrictions considering international literature indexed from 1980 to 2007 in Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library. We analyzed the reference lists of the key manuscripts. We also added a review based on international non-indexed sources. RESULTS: The feasibility of diagnostic laparoscopy is high (60–100%), while that of therapeutic laparoscopy is low (40–88%). The frequency of laparotomic conversions is variable ranging from 0 to 52%, depending on patient selection and surgical skill. The first cause of laparotomic conversion is a difficult exposition and treatment of band adhesions. The incidence of laparotomic conversions is major in patients with anterior peritoneal band adhesions. Other main causes for laparotomic conversion are the presence of bowel necrosis and accidental enterotomies. The predictive factors for successful laparoscopic adhesiolysis are: number of previous laparotomies ≤ 2, non-median previous laparotomy, appendectomy as previous surgical treatment causing adherences, unique band adhesion as phatogenetic mechanism of small bowel obstruction, early laparoscopic management within 24 hours from the onset of symptoms, no signs of peritonitis on physical examination, experience of the surgeon. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic adhesiolysis in small bowel obstruction is feasible but can be convenient only if performed by skilled surgeons in selected patients. The laparoscopic adhesiolysis for small bowel obstruction is satisfactorily carried out when early indicated in patients with a low number of laparotomies resulting in a short hospital stay and a lower postoperative morbidity. Although a higher small bowel obstruction recurrence remains the major postoperative risk of the laparoscopic management of these patients. BioMed Central 2009-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC2639545/ /pubmed/19152695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-7922-4-3 Text en Copyright © 2009 Farinella et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Farinella, Eriberto
Cirocchi, Roberto
La Mura, Francesco
Morelli, Umberto
Cattorini, Lorenzo
Delmonaco, Pamela
Migliaccio, Carla
De Sol, Angelo A
Cozzaglio, Luca
Sciannameo, Francesco
Feasibility of laparoscopy for small bowel obstruction
title Feasibility of laparoscopy for small bowel obstruction
title_full Feasibility of laparoscopy for small bowel obstruction
title_fullStr Feasibility of laparoscopy for small bowel obstruction
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility of laparoscopy for small bowel obstruction
title_short Feasibility of laparoscopy for small bowel obstruction
title_sort feasibility of laparoscopy for small bowel obstruction
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2639545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19152695
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-7922-4-3
work_keys_str_mv AT farinellaeriberto feasibilityoflaparoscopyforsmallbowelobstruction
AT cirocchiroberto feasibilityoflaparoscopyforsmallbowelobstruction
AT lamurafrancesco feasibilityoflaparoscopyforsmallbowelobstruction
AT morelliumberto feasibilityoflaparoscopyforsmallbowelobstruction
AT cattorinilorenzo feasibilityoflaparoscopyforsmallbowelobstruction
AT delmonacopamela feasibilityoflaparoscopyforsmallbowelobstruction
AT migliacciocarla feasibilityoflaparoscopyforsmallbowelobstruction
AT desolangeloa feasibilityoflaparoscopyforsmallbowelobstruction
AT cozzaglioluca feasibilityoflaparoscopyforsmallbowelobstruction
AT sciannameofrancesco feasibilityoflaparoscopyforsmallbowelobstruction