Cargando…

Are Protein Domains Modules of Lateral Genetic Transfer?

BACKGROUND: In prokaryotes and some eukaryotes, genetic material can be transferred laterally among unrelated lineages and recombined into new host genomes, providing metabolic and physiological novelty. Although the process is usually framed in terms of gene sharing (e.g. lateral gene transfer, LGT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chan, Cheong Xin, Darling, Aaron E., Beiko, Robert G., Ragan, Mark A.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2639706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19229333
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004524
_version_ 1782164498284544000
author Chan, Cheong Xin
Darling, Aaron E.
Beiko, Robert G.
Ragan, Mark A.
author_facet Chan, Cheong Xin
Darling, Aaron E.
Beiko, Robert G.
Ragan, Mark A.
author_sort Chan, Cheong Xin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In prokaryotes and some eukaryotes, genetic material can be transferred laterally among unrelated lineages and recombined into new host genomes, providing metabolic and physiological novelty. Although the process is usually framed in terms of gene sharing (e.g. lateral gene transfer, LGT), there is little reason to imagine that the units of transfer and recombination correspond to entire, intact genes. Proteins often consist of one or more spatially compact structural regions (domains) which may fold autonomously and which, singly or in combination, confer the protein's specific functions. As LGT is frequent in strongly selective environments and natural selection is based on function, we hypothesized that domains might also serve as modules of genetic transfer, i.e. that regions of DNA that are transferred and recombined between lineages might encode intact structural domains of proteins. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We selected 1,462 orthologous gene sets representing 144 prokaryotic genomes, and applied a rigorous two-stage approach to identify recombination breakpoints within these sequences. Recombination breakpoints are very significantly over-represented in gene sets within which protein domain-encoding regions have been annotated. Within these gene sets, breakpoints significantly avoid the domain-encoding regions (domons), except where these regions constitute most of the sequence length. Recombination breakpoints that fall within longer domons are distributed uniformly at random, but those that fall within shorter domons may show a slight tendency to avoid the domon midpoint. As we find no evidence for differential selection against nucleotide substitutions following the recombination event, any bias against disruption of domains must be a consequence of the recombination event per se. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first systematic study relating the units of LGT to structural features at the protein level. Many genes have been interrupted by recombination following inter-lineage genetic transfer, during which the regions within these genes that encode protein domains have not been preferentially preserved intact. Protein domains are units of function, but domons are not modules of transfer and recombination. Our results demonstrate that LGT can remodel even the most functionally conservative modules within genomes.
format Text
id pubmed-2639706
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26397062009-02-20 Are Protein Domains Modules of Lateral Genetic Transfer? Chan, Cheong Xin Darling, Aaron E. Beiko, Robert G. Ragan, Mark A. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: In prokaryotes and some eukaryotes, genetic material can be transferred laterally among unrelated lineages and recombined into new host genomes, providing metabolic and physiological novelty. Although the process is usually framed in terms of gene sharing (e.g. lateral gene transfer, LGT), there is little reason to imagine that the units of transfer and recombination correspond to entire, intact genes. Proteins often consist of one or more spatially compact structural regions (domains) which may fold autonomously and which, singly or in combination, confer the protein's specific functions. As LGT is frequent in strongly selective environments and natural selection is based on function, we hypothesized that domains might also serve as modules of genetic transfer, i.e. that regions of DNA that are transferred and recombined between lineages might encode intact structural domains of proteins. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We selected 1,462 orthologous gene sets representing 144 prokaryotic genomes, and applied a rigorous two-stage approach to identify recombination breakpoints within these sequences. Recombination breakpoints are very significantly over-represented in gene sets within which protein domain-encoding regions have been annotated. Within these gene sets, breakpoints significantly avoid the domain-encoding regions (domons), except where these regions constitute most of the sequence length. Recombination breakpoints that fall within longer domons are distributed uniformly at random, but those that fall within shorter domons may show a slight tendency to avoid the domon midpoint. As we find no evidence for differential selection against nucleotide substitutions following the recombination event, any bias against disruption of domains must be a consequence of the recombination event per se. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first systematic study relating the units of LGT to structural features at the protein level. Many genes have been interrupted by recombination following inter-lineage genetic transfer, during which the regions within these genes that encode protein domains have not been preferentially preserved intact. Protein domains are units of function, but domons are not modules of transfer and recombination. Our results demonstrate that LGT can remodel even the most functionally conservative modules within genomes. Public Library of Science 2009-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2639706/ /pubmed/19229333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004524 Text en Chan et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chan, Cheong Xin
Darling, Aaron E.
Beiko, Robert G.
Ragan, Mark A.
Are Protein Domains Modules of Lateral Genetic Transfer?
title Are Protein Domains Modules of Lateral Genetic Transfer?
title_full Are Protein Domains Modules of Lateral Genetic Transfer?
title_fullStr Are Protein Domains Modules of Lateral Genetic Transfer?
title_full_unstemmed Are Protein Domains Modules of Lateral Genetic Transfer?
title_short Are Protein Domains Modules of Lateral Genetic Transfer?
title_sort are protein domains modules of lateral genetic transfer?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2639706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19229333
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004524
work_keys_str_mv AT chancheongxin areproteindomainsmodulesoflateralgenetictransfer
AT darlingaarone areproteindomainsmodulesoflateralgenetictransfer
AT beikorobertg areproteindomainsmodulesoflateralgenetictransfer
AT raganmarka areproteindomainsmodulesoflateralgenetictransfer