Cargando…

Assessing the costs and benefits of an oral vaccine for raccoon rabies: a possible model.

Any cost-benefit analysis of the use of an oral vaccine to control raccoon rabies should include calculating both costs and benefits in terms of $/unit area. Further, cost savings must be adjusted to match the stages of an epizootic: pre-epizootic, epizootic, and post-epizootic. A generic model, whi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Meltzer, M I
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1996
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2639934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8969251
_version_ 1782164515883843584
author Meltzer, M I
author_facet Meltzer, M I
author_sort Meltzer, M I
collection PubMed
description Any cost-benefit analysis of the use of an oral vaccine to control raccoon rabies should include calculating both costs and benefits in terms of $/unit area. Further, cost savings must be adjusted to match the stages of an epizootic: pre-epizootic, epizootic, and post-epizootic. A generic model, which can be adapted to different sites, illustrates the use of threshold analysis to link distribution costs, cost savings, bait density, and vaccine price. Initial results indicate the need to lower the cost of the vaccine, continue research to determine optimal bait densities, and examine distribution plans that do not require continued protection of areas in which raccoon rabies was eliminated through previous vaccination programs.
format Text
id pubmed-2639934
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1996
publisher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26399342009-05-20 Assessing the costs and benefits of an oral vaccine for raccoon rabies: a possible model. Meltzer, M I Emerg Infect Dis Research Article Any cost-benefit analysis of the use of an oral vaccine to control raccoon rabies should include calculating both costs and benefits in terms of $/unit area. Further, cost savings must be adjusted to match the stages of an epizootic: pre-epizootic, epizootic, and post-epizootic. A generic model, which can be adapted to different sites, illustrates the use of threshold analysis to link distribution costs, cost savings, bait density, and vaccine price. Initial results indicate the need to lower the cost of the vaccine, continue research to determine optimal bait densities, and examine distribution plans that do not require continued protection of areas in which raccoon rabies was eliminated through previous vaccination programs. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1996 /pmc/articles/PMC2639934/ /pubmed/8969251 Text en
spellingShingle Research Article
Meltzer, M I
Assessing the costs and benefits of an oral vaccine for raccoon rabies: a possible model.
title Assessing the costs and benefits of an oral vaccine for raccoon rabies: a possible model.
title_full Assessing the costs and benefits of an oral vaccine for raccoon rabies: a possible model.
title_fullStr Assessing the costs and benefits of an oral vaccine for raccoon rabies: a possible model.
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the costs and benefits of an oral vaccine for raccoon rabies: a possible model.
title_short Assessing the costs and benefits of an oral vaccine for raccoon rabies: a possible model.
title_sort assessing the costs and benefits of an oral vaccine for raccoon rabies: a possible model.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2639934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8969251
work_keys_str_mv AT meltzermi assessingthecostsandbenefitsofanoralvaccineforraccoonrabiesapossiblemodel