Cargando…
An Outcome-based Approach for the Creation of Fetal Growth Standards: Do Singletons and Twins Need Separate Standards?
Contemporary fetal growth standards are created by using theoretical properties (percentiles) of birth weight (for gestational age) distributions. The authors used a clinically relevant, outcome-based methodology to determine if separate fetal growth standards are required for singletons and twins....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2640160/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19126584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwn374 |
_version_ | 1782164534893477888 |
---|---|
author | Joseph, K. S. Fahey, John Platt, Robert W. Liston, Robert M. Lee, Shoo K. Sauve, Reg Liu, Shiliang Allen, Alexander C. Kramer, Michael S. |
author_facet | Joseph, K. S. Fahey, John Platt, Robert W. Liston, Robert M. Lee, Shoo K. Sauve, Reg Liu, Shiliang Allen, Alexander C. Kramer, Michael S. |
author_sort | Joseph, K. S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Contemporary fetal growth standards are created by using theoretical properties (percentiles) of birth weight (for gestational age) distributions. The authors used a clinically relevant, outcome-based methodology to determine if separate fetal growth standards are required for singletons and twins. All singleton and twin livebirths between 36 and 42 weeks’ gestation in the United States (1995–2002) were included, after exclusions for missing information and other factors (n = 17,811,922). A birth weight range was identified, at each gestational age, over which serious neonatal morbidity and neonatal mortality rates were lowest. Among singleton males at 40 weeks, serious neonatal morbidity/mortality rates were lowest between 3,012 g (95% confidence interval (CI): 3,008, 3,018) and 3,978 g (95% CI: 3,976, 3,980). The low end of this optimal birth weight range for females was 37 g (95% CI: 21, 53) less. The low optimal birth weight was 152 g (95% CI: 121, 183) less for twins compared with singletons. No differences were observed in low optimal birth weight by period (1999–2002 vs. 1995–1998), but small differences were observed for maternal education, race, parity, age, and smoking status. Patterns of birth weight-specific serious neonatal morbidity/neonatal mortality support the need for plurality-specific fetal growth standards. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2640160 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26401602009-02-25 An Outcome-based Approach for the Creation of Fetal Growth Standards: Do Singletons and Twins Need Separate Standards? Joseph, K. S. Fahey, John Platt, Robert W. Liston, Robert M. Lee, Shoo K. Sauve, Reg Liu, Shiliang Allen, Alexander C. Kramer, Michael S. Am J Epidemiol Original Contributions Contemporary fetal growth standards are created by using theoretical properties (percentiles) of birth weight (for gestational age) distributions. The authors used a clinically relevant, outcome-based methodology to determine if separate fetal growth standards are required for singletons and twins. All singleton and twin livebirths between 36 and 42 weeks’ gestation in the United States (1995–2002) were included, after exclusions for missing information and other factors (n = 17,811,922). A birth weight range was identified, at each gestational age, over which serious neonatal morbidity and neonatal mortality rates were lowest. Among singleton males at 40 weeks, serious neonatal morbidity/mortality rates were lowest between 3,012 g (95% confidence interval (CI): 3,008, 3,018) and 3,978 g (95% CI: 3,976, 3,980). The low end of this optimal birth weight range for females was 37 g (95% CI: 21, 53) less. The low optimal birth weight was 152 g (95% CI: 121, 183) less for twins compared with singletons. No differences were observed in low optimal birth weight by period (1999–2002 vs. 1995–1998), but small differences were observed for maternal education, race, parity, age, and smoking status. Patterns of birth weight-specific serious neonatal morbidity/neonatal mortality support the need for plurality-specific fetal growth standards. Oxford University Press 2009-03-01 2009-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2640160/ /pubmed/19126584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwn374 Text en American Journal of Epidemiology Published by Oxford University Press 2009. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Contributions Joseph, K. S. Fahey, John Platt, Robert W. Liston, Robert M. Lee, Shoo K. Sauve, Reg Liu, Shiliang Allen, Alexander C. Kramer, Michael S. An Outcome-based Approach for the Creation of Fetal Growth Standards: Do Singletons and Twins Need Separate Standards? |
title | An Outcome-based Approach for the Creation of Fetal Growth Standards: Do Singletons and Twins Need Separate Standards? |
title_full | An Outcome-based Approach for the Creation of Fetal Growth Standards: Do Singletons and Twins Need Separate Standards? |
title_fullStr | An Outcome-based Approach for the Creation of Fetal Growth Standards: Do Singletons and Twins Need Separate Standards? |
title_full_unstemmed | An Outcome-based Approach for the Creation of Fetal Growth Standards: Do Singletons and Twins Need Separate Standards? |
title_short | An Outcome-based Approach for the Creation of Fetal Growth Standards: Do Singletons and Twins Need Separate Standards? |
title_sort | outcome-based approach for the creation of fetal growth standards: do singletons and twins need separate standards? |
topic | Original Contributions |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2640160/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19126584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwn374 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT josephks anoutcomebasedapproachforthecreationoffetalgrowthstandardsdosingletonsandtwinsneedseparatestandards AT faheyjohn anoutcomebasedapproachforthecreationoffetalgrowthstandardsdosingletonsandtwinsneedseparatestandards AT plattrobertw anoutcomebasedapproachforthecreationoffetalgrowthstandardsdosingletonsandtwinsneedseparatestandards AT listonrobertm anoutcomebasedapproachforthecreationoffetalgrowthstandardsdosingletonsandtwinsneedseparatestandards AT leeshook anoutcomebasedapproachforthecreationoffetalgrowthstandardsdosingletonsandtwinsneedseparatestandards AT sauvereg anoutcomebasedapproachforthecreationoffetalgrowthstandardsdosingletonsandtwinsneedseparatestandards AT liushiliang anoutcomebasedapproachforthecreationoffetalgrowthstandardsdosingletonsandtwinsneedseparatestandards AT allenalexanderc anoutcomebasedapproachforthecreationoffetalgrowthstandardsdosingletonsandtwinsneedseparatestandards AT kramermichaels anoutcomebasedapproachforthecreationoffetalgrowthstandardsdosingletonsandtwinsneedseparatestandards AT josephks outcomebasedapproachforthecreationoffetalgrowthstandardsdosingletonsandtwinsneedseparatestandards AT faheyjohn outcomebasedapproachforthecreationoffetalgrowthstandardsdosingletonsandtwinsneedseparatestandards AT plattrobertw outcomebasedapproachforthecreationoffetalgrowthstandardsdosingletonsandtwinsneedseparatestandards AT listonrobertm outcomebasedapproachforthecreationoffetalgrowthstandardsdosingletonsandtwinsneedseparatestandards AT leeshook outcomebasedapproachforthecreationoffetalgrowthstandardsdosingletonsandtwinsneedseparatestandards AT sauvereg outcomebasedapproachforthecreationoffetalgrowthstandardsdosingletonsandtwinsneedseparatestandards AT liushiliang outcomebasedapproachforthecreationoffetalgrowthstandardsdosingletonsandtwinsneedseparatestandards AT allenalexanderc outcomebasedapproachforthecreationoffetalgrowthstandardsdosingletonsandtwinsneedseparatestandards AT kramermichaels outcomebasedapproachforthecreationoffetalgrowthstandardsdosingletonsandtwinsneedseparatestandards |