Cargando…

Postnatal quality of life in women after normal vaginal delivery and caesarean section

BACKGROUND: Caesarean section might increase the incidence of surgical interventions and problems resulting from hospitalization and thus affecting quality of life in women after delivery. This study aimed to compare quality of life in women after normal delivery and caesarean section. METHODS: This...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Torkan, Behnaz, Parsay, Sousan, Lamyian, Minoor, Kazemnejad, Anoshirvan, Montazeri, Ali
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2640344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19183480
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-9-4
_version_ 1782164558711881728
author Torkan, Behnaz
Parsay, Sousan
Lamyian, Minoor
Kazemnejad, Anoshirvan
Montazeri, Ali
author_facet Torkan, Behnaz
Parsay, Sousan
Lamyian, Minoor
Kazemnejad, Anoshirvan
Montazeri, Ali
author_sort Torkan, Behnaz
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Caesarean section might increase the incidence of surgical interventions and problems resulting from hospitalization and thus affecting quality of life in women after delivery. This study aimed to compare quality of life in women after normal delivery and caesarean section. METHODS: This was a prospective study. A sample of women with normal delivery and caesarean section from 5 health care centers in Isfahan, Iran were entered into the study. Quality of life was measured using the SF-36 at two points in time (time 1: 6 to 8 weeks after delivery; time 2: 12 to 14 weeks after delivery). Data were analyzed to compare quality of life in the two study groups. RESULTS: In all 100 women were interviewed (50 with normal delivery and 50 with caesarean section). Postnatal quality of life in both groups was improved from time1 to time 2. However, comparing the mean scores between the normal and caesarean delivery groups the results showed that in general the normal vaginal delivery group had a better quality of life for almost all subscales in both assessment times. The differences were significant for vitality (mean score 62.9 vs. 54.4 P = 0.03) and mental health (mean score 75.1 vs. 66.7, P = 0.03) at first assessment and for physical functioning (mean score 88.4 vs. 81.5, P = 0.03) at second evaluation. However, comparing the findings within each group the analysis showed that the normal vaginal delivery group improved more on physical health related quality of life while the caesarean section group improved more on mental health related quality of life. CONCLUSION: Although the study did not show a clear cut benefit in favor of either methods of delivery that are normal vaginal delivery or caesarean section, the findings suggest that normal vaginal delivery might lead to a better quality of life especially resulting in a superior physical health. Indeed in the absence of medical indications normal vaginal delivery might be better to be considered as the first priority in term pregnancy.
format Text
id pubmed-2640344
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26403442009-02-12 Postnatal quality of life in women after normal vaginal delivery and caesarean section Torkan, Behnaz Parsay, Sousan Lamyian, Minoor Kazemnejad, Anoshirvan Montazeri, Ali BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Caesarean section might increase the incidence of surgical interventions and problems resulting from hospitalization and thus affecting quality of life in women after delivery. This study aimed to compare quality of life in women after normal delivery and caesarean section. METHODS: This was a prospective study. A sample of women with normal delivery and caesarean section from 5 health care centers in Isfahan, Iran were entered into the study. Quality of life was measured using the SF-36 at two points in time (time 1: 6 to 8 weeks after delivery; time 2: 12 to 14 weeks after delivery). Data were analyzed to compare quality of life in the two study groups. RESULTS: In all 100 women were interviewed (50 with normal delivery and 50 with caesarean section). Postnatal quality of life in both groups was improved from time1 to time 2. However, comparing the mean scores between the normal and caesarean delivery groups the results showed that in general the normal vaginal delivery group had a better quality of life for almost all subscales in both assessment times. The differences were significant for vitality (mean score 62.9 vs. 54.4 P = 0.03) and mental health (mean score 75.1 vs. 66.7, P = 0.03) at first assessment and for physical functioning (mean score 88.4 vs. 81.5, P = 0.03) at second evaluation. However, comparing the findings within each group the analysis showed that the normal vaginal delivery group improved more on physical health related quality of life while the caesarean section group improved more on mental health related quality of life. CONCLUSION: Although the study did not show a clear cut benefit in favor of either methods of delivery that are normal vaginal delivery or caesarean section, the findings suggest that normal vaginal delivery might lead to a better quality of life especially resulting in a superior physical health. Indeed in the absence of medical indications normal vaginal delivery might be better to be considered as the first priority in term pregnancy. BioMed Central 2009-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2640344/ /pubmed/19183480 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-9-4 Text en Copyright © 2009 Torkan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Torkan, Behnaz
Parsay, Sousan
Lamyian, Minoor
Kazemnejad, Anoshirvan
Montazeri, Ali
Postnatal quality of life in women after normal vaginal delivery and caesarean section
title Postnatal quality of life in women after normal vaginal delivery and caesarean section
title_full Postnatal quality of life in women after normal vaginal delivery and caesarean section
title_fullStr Postnatal quality of life in women after normal vaginal delivery and caesarean section
title_full_unstemmed Postnatal quality of life in women after normal vaginal delivery and caesarean section
title_short Postnatal quality of life in women after normal vaginal delivery and caesarean section
title_sort postnatal quality of life in women after normal vaginal delivery and caesarean section
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2640344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19183480
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-9-4
work_keys_str_mv AT torkanbehnaz postnatalqualityoflifeinwomenafternormalvaginaldeliveryandcaesareansection
AT parsaysousan postnatalqualityoflifeinwomenafternormalvaginaldeliveryandcaesareansection
AT lamyianminoor postnatalqualityoflifeinwomenafternormalvaginaldeliveryandcaesareansection
AT kazemnejadanoshirvan postnatalqualityoflifeinwomenafternormalvaginaldeliveryandcaesareansection
AT montazeriali postnatalqualityoflifeinwomenafternormalvaginaldeliveryandcaesareansection