Cargando…

Evaluation and optimization of membrane feeding compared to direct feeding as an assay for infectivity

BACKGROUND: Malaria parasite infectivity to mosquitoes has been measured in a variety of ways and setting, includind direct feeds of and/or membrane feeding blood collected from randomly selected or gametocytemic volunteers. Anopheles gambiae s.l is the main vector responsible of Plasmodium falcipar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Diallo, Mouctar, Touré, Abdoulaye M, Traoré, Sekou F, Niaré, Oumou, Kassambara, Lalla, Konaré, Awa, Coulibaly, Mamadou, Bagayogo, Magaran, Beier, John C, Sakai, Richard K, Touré, Yéya T, Doumbo, Ogobara K
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2640402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19055715
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-7-248
_version_ 1782164572632776704
author Diallo, Mouctar
Touré, Abdoulaye M
Traoré, Sekou F
Niaré, Oumou
Kassambara, Lalla
Konaré, Awa
Coulibaly, Mamadou
Bagayogo, Magaran
Beier, John C
Sakai, Richard K
Touré, Yéya T
Doumbo, Ogobara K
author_facet Diallo, Mouctar
Touré, Abdoulaye M
Traoré, Sekou F
Niaré, Oumou
Kassambara, Lalla
Konaré, Awa
Coulibaly, Mamadou
Bagayogo, Magaran
Beier, John C
Sakai, Richard K
Touré, Yéya T
Doumbo, Ogobara K
author_sort Diallo, Mouctar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Malaria parasite infectivity to mosquitoes has been measured in a variety of ways and setting, includind direct feeds of and/or membrane feeding blood collected from randomly selected or gametocytemic volunteers. Anopheles gambiae s.l is the main vector responsible of Plasmodium falciparum transmission in Bancoumana and represents about 90% of the laboratory findings, whereas Plasmodium malariae and Plasmodium ovale together represent only 10%. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between August 1996 and December 1998, direct and membrane feeding methods were compared for the infectivity of children and adolescent gametocyte carriers to anopheline mosquitoes in the village of Bancoumana in Mali. Gametocyte carriers were recruited twice a month through a screening of members of 30 families using Giemsa-stained thick blood smears. F1 generation mosquitoes issued from individual female wild mosquitoes from Bancoumana were reared in a controlled insectary conditions and fed 5% sugar solution in the laboratory in Bamako, until the feeding day when they are starved 12 hours before the feeding experiment. These F1 generation mosquitoes were divided in two groups, one group fed directly on gametocyte carriers and the other fed using membrane feeding method. RESULTS: Results from 372 Plasmodium falciparum gametocyte carriers showed that children aged 4–9 years were more infectious than adolescents (p = 0.039), especially during the rainy season. Data from 35 carriers showed that mosquitoes which were used for direct feeding were about 1.5 times more likely to feed (p < 0.001) and two times more likely to become infected, if they fed (p < 0.001), than were those which were used for membrane feeding. Overall, infectivity was about three-times higher for direct feeding than for membrane feeding (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Although intensity of infectivity was lower for membrane feeding, it could be a surrogate to direct feeding for evaluating transmission-blocking activity of candidate malaria vaccines. An optimization of the method for future trials would involve using about three-times more mosquitoes than would be used for direct feeding.
format Text
id pubmed-2640402
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26404022009-02-12 Evaluation and optimization of membrane feeding compared to direct feeding as an assay for infectivity Diallo, Mouctar Touré, Abdoulaye M Traoré, Sekou F Niaré, Oumou Kassambara, Lalla Konaré, Awa Coulibaly, Mamadou Bagayogo, Magaran Beier, John C Sakai, Richard K Touré, Yéya T Doumbo, Ogobara K Malar J Methodology BACKGROUND: Malaria parasite infectivity to mosquitoes has been measured in a variety of ways and setting, includind direct feeds of and/or membrane feeding blood collected from randomly selected or gametocytemic volunteers. Anopheles gambiae s.l is the main vector responsible of Plasmodium falciparum transmission in Bancoumana and represents about 90% of the laboratory findings, whereas Plasmodium malariae and Plasmodium ovale together represent only 10%. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between August 1996 and December 1998, direct and membrane feeding methods were compared for the infectivity of children and adolescent gametocyte carriers to anopheline mosquitoes in the village of Bancoumana in Mali. Gametocyte carriers were recruited twice a month through a screening of members of 30 families using Giemsa-stained thick blood smears. F1 generation mosquitoes issued from individual female wild mosquitoes from Bancoumana were reared in a controlled insectary conditions and fed 5% sugar solution in the laboratory in Bamako, until the feeding day when they are starved 12 hours before the feeding experiment. These F1 generation mosquitoes were divided in two groups, one group fed directly on gametocyte carriers and the other fed using membrane feeding method. RESULTS: Results from 372 Plasmodium falciparum gametocyte carriers showed that children aged 4–9 years were more infectious than adolescents (p = 0.039), especially during the rainy season. Data from 35 carriers showed that mosquitoes which were used for direct feeding were about 1.5 times more likely to feed (p < 0.001) and two times more likely to become infected, if they fed (p < 0.001), than were those which were used for membrane feeding. Overall, infectivity was about three-times higher for direct feeding than for membrane feeding (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Although intensity of infectivity was lower for membrane feeding, it could be a surrogate to direct feeding for evaluating transmission-blocking activity of candidate malaria vaccines. An optimization of the method for future trials would involve using about three-times more mosquitoes than would be used for direct feeding. BioMed Central 2008-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC2640402/ /pubmed/19055715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-7-248 Text en Copyright © 2008 Diallo et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology
Diallo, Mouctar
Touré, Abdoulaye M
Traoré, Sekou F
Niaré, Oumou
Kassambara, Lalla
Konaré, Awa
Coulibaly, Mamadou
Bagayogo, Magaran
Beier, John C
Sakai, Richard K
Touré, Yéya T
Doumbo, Ogobara K
Evaluation and optimization of membrane feeding compared to direct feeding as an assay for infectivity
title Evaluation and optimization of membrane feeding compared to direct feeding as an assay for infectivity
title_full Evaluation and optimization of membrane feeding compared to direct feeding as an assay for infectivity
title_fullStr Evaluation and optimization of membrane feeding compared to direct feeding as an assay for infectivity
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation and optimization of membrane feeding compared to direct feeding as an assay for infectivity
title_short Evaluation and optimization of membrane feeding compared to direct feeding as an assay for infectivity
title_sort evaluation and optimization of membrane feeding compared to direct feeding as an assay for infectivity
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2640402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19055715
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-7-248
work_keys_str_mv AT diallomouctar evaluationandoptimizationofmembranefeedingcomparedtodirectfeedingasanassayforinfectivity
AT toureabdoulayem evaluationandoptimizationofmembranefeedingcomparedtodirectfeedingasanassayforinfectivity
AT traoresekouf evaluationandoptimizationofmembranefeedingcomparedtodirectfeedingasanassayforinfectivity
AT niareoumou evaluationandoptimizationofmembranefeedingcomparedtodirectfeedingasanassayforinfectivity
AT kassambaralalla evaluationandoptimizationofmembranefeedingcomparedtodirectfeedingasanassayforinfectivity
AT konareawa evaluationandoptimizationofmembranefeedingcomparedtodirectfeedingasanassayforinfectivity
AT coulibalymamadou evaluationandoptimizationofmembranefeedingcomparedtodirectfeedingasanassayforinfectivity
AT bagayogomagaran evaluationandoptimizationofmembranefeedingcomparedtodirectfeedingasanassayforinfectivity
AT beierjohnc evaluationandoptimizationofmembranefeedingcomparedtodirectfeedingasanassayforinfectivity
AT sakairichardk evaluationandoptimizationofmembranefeedingcomparedtodirectfeedingasanassayforinfectivity
AT toureyeyat evaluationandoptimizationofmembranefeedingcomparedtodirectfeedingasanassayforinfectivity
AT doumboogobarak evaluationandoptimizationofmembranefeedingcomparedtodirectfeedingasanassayforinfectivity