Cargando…

Behavioral and brain pattern differences between acting and observing in an auditory task

BACKGROUND: Recent research has shown that errors seem to influence the patterns of brain activity. Additionally current notions support the idea that similar brain mechanisms are activated during acting and observing. The aim of the present study was to examine the patterns of brain activity of act...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karanasiou, Irene S, Papageorgiou, Charalabos, Tsianaka, Eleni I, Matsopoulos, George K, Ventouras, Errikos M, Uzunoglu, Nikolaos K
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2640410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19154586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-5-5
_version_ 1782164574556913664
author Karanasiou, Irene S
Papageorgiou, Charalabos
Tsianaka, Eleni I
Matsopoulos, George K
Ventouras, Errikos M
Uzunoglu, Nikolaos K
author_facet Karanasiou, Irene S
Papageorgiou, Charalabos
Tsianaka, Eleni I
Matsopoulos, George K
Ventouras, Errikos M
Uzunoglu, Nikolaos K
author_sort Karanasiou, Irene S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recent research has shown that errors seem to influence the patterns of brain activity. Additionally current notions support the idea that similar brain mechanisms are activated during acting and observing. The aim of the present study was to examine the patterns of brain activity of actors and observers elicited upon receiving feedback information of the actor's response. METHODS: The task used in the present research was an auditory identification task that included both acting and observing settings, ensuring concurrent ERP measurements of both participants. The performance of the participants was investigated in conditions of varying complexity. ERP data were analyzed with regards to the conditions of acting and observing in conjunction to correct and erroneous responses. RESULTS: The obtained results showed that the complexity induced by cue dissimilarity between trials was a demodulating factor leading to poorer performance. The electrophysiological results suggest that feedback information results in different intensities of the ERP patterns of observers and actors depending on whether the actor had made an error or not. The LORETA source localization method yielded significantly larger electrical activity in the supplementary motor area (Brodmann area 6), the posterior cingulate gyrus (Brodmann area 31/23) and the parietal lobe (Precuneus/Brodmann area 7/5). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that feedback information has a different effect on the intensities of the ERP patterns of actors and observers depending on whether the actor committed an error. Certain neural systems, including medial frontal area, posterior cingulate gyrus and precuneus may mediate these modulating effects. Further research is needed to elucidate in more detail the neuroanatomical and neuropsychological substrates of these systems.
format Text
id pubmed-2640410
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26404102009-02-12 Behavioral and brain pattern differences between acting and observing in an auditory task Karanasiou, Irene S Papageorgiou, Charalabos Tsianaka, Eleni I Matsopoulos, George K Ventouras, Errikos M Uzunoglu, Nikolaos K Behav Brain Funct Research BACKGROUND: Recent research has shown that errors seem to influence the patterns of brain activity. Additionally current notions support the idea that similar brain mechanisms are activated during acting and observing. The aim of the present study was to examine the patterns of brain activity of actors and observers elicited upon receiving feedback information of the actor's response. METHODS: The task used in the present research was an auditory identification task that included both acting and observing settings, ensuring concurrent ERP measurements of both participants. The performance of the participants was investigated in conditions of varying complexity. ERP data were analyzed with regards to the conditions of acting and observing in conjunction to correct and erroneous responses. RESULTS: The obtained results showed that the complexity induced by cue dissimilarity between trials was a demodulating factor leading to poorer performance. The electrophysiological results suggest that feedback information results in different intensities of the ERP patterns of observers and actors depending on whether the actor had made an error or not. The LORETA source localization method yielded significantly larger electrical activity in the supplementary motor area (Brodmann area 6), the posterior cingulate gyrus (Brodmann area 31/23) and the parietal lobe (Precuneus/Brodmann area 7/5). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that feedback information has a different effect on the intensities of the ERP patterns of actors and observers depending on whether the actor committed an error. Certain neural systems, including medial frontal area, posterior cingulate gyrus and precuneus may mediate these modulating effects. Further research is needed to elucidate in more detail the neuroanatomical and neuropsychological substrates of these systems. BioMed Central 2009-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2640410/ /pubmed/19154586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-5-5 Text en Copyright © 2009 Karanasiou et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Karanasiou, Irene S
Papageorgiou, Charalabos
Tsianaka, Eleni I
Matsopoulos, George K
Ventouras, Errikos M
Uzunoglu, Nikolaos K
Behavioral and brain pattern differences between acting and observing in an auditory task
title Behavioral and brain pattern differences between acting and observing in an auditory task
title_full Behavioral and brain pattern differences between acting and observing in an auditory task
title_fullStr Behavioral and brain pattern differences between acting and observing in an auditory task
title_full_unstemmed Behavioral and brain pattern differences between acting and observing in an auditory task
title_short Behavioral and brain pattern differences between acting and observing in an auditory task
title_sort behavioral and brain pattern differences between acting and observing in an auditory task
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2640410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19154586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-5-5
work_keys_str_mv AT karanasiouirenes behavioralandbrainpatterndifferencesbetweenactingandobservinginanauditorytask
AT papageorgioucharalabos behavioralandbrainpatterndifferencesbetweenactingandobservinginanauditorytask
AT tsianakaelenii behavioralandbrainpatterndifferencesbetweenactingandobservinginanauditorytask
AT matsopoulosgeorgek behavioralandbrainpatterndifferencesbetweenactingandobservinginanauditorytask
AT ventouraserrikosm behavioralandbrainpatterndifferencesbetweenactingandobservinginanauditorytask
AT uzunoglunikolaosk behavioralandbrainpatterndifferencesbetweenactingandobservinginanauditorytask