Cargando…

Development and Preliminary Evaluation of a Multivariate Index Assay for Ovarian Cancer

BACKGROUND: Most women with a clinical presentation consistent with ovarian cancer have benign conditions. Therefore methods to distinguish women with ovarian cancer from those with benign conditions would be beneficial. We describe the development and preliminary evaluation of a serum-based multiva...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amonkar, Suraj D., Bertenshaw, Greg P., Chen, Tzong-Hao, Bergstrom, Katharine J., Zhao, Jinghua, Seshaiah, Partha, Yip, Ping, Mansfield, Brian C.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2643010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19240799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004599
_version_ 1782164678841991168
author Amonkar, Suraj D.
Bertenshaw, Greg P.
Chen, Tzong-Hao
Bergstrom, Katharine J.
Zhao, Jinghua
Seshaiah, Partha
Yip, Ping
Mansfield, Brian C.
author_facet Amonkar, Suraj D.
Bertenshaw, Greg P.
Chen, Tzong-Hao
Bergstrom, Katharine J.
Zhao, Jinghua
Seshaiah, Partha
Yip, Ping
Mansfield, Brian C.
author_sort Amonkar, Suraj D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Most women with a clinical presentation consistent with ovarian cancer have benign conditions. Therefore methods to distinguish women with ovarian cancer from those with benign conditions would be beneficial. We describe the development and preliminary evaluation of a serum-based multivariate assay for ovarian cancer. This hypothesis-driven study examined whether an informative pattern could be detected in stage I disease that persists through later stages. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Sera, collected under uniform protocols from multiple institutions, representing 176 cases and 187 controls from women presenting for surgery were examined using high-throughput, multiplexed immunoassays. All stages and common subtypes of epithelial ovarian cancer, and the most common benign ovarian conditions were represented. A panel of 104 antigens, 44 autoimmune and 56 infectious disease markers were assayed and informative combinations identified. Using a training set of 91 stage I data sets, representing 61 individual samples, and an equivalent number of controls, an 11-analyte profile, composed of CA-125, CA 19-9, EGF-R, C-reactive protein, myoglobin, apolipoprotein A1, apolipoprotein CIII, MIP-1α, IL-6, IL-18 and tenascin C was identified and appears informative for all stages and common subtypes of ovarian cancer. Using a testing set of 245 samples, approximately twice the size of the model building set, the classifier had 91.3% sensitivity and 88.5% specificity. While these preliminary results are promising, further refinement and extensive validation of the classifier in a clinical trial is necessary to determine if the test has clinical value. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We describe a blood-based assay using 11 analytes that can distinguish women with ovarian cancer from those with benign conditions. Preliminary evaluation of the classifier suggests it has the potential to offer approximately 90% sensitivity and 90% specificity. While promising, the performance needs to be assessed in a blinded clinical validation study.
format Text
id pubmed-2643010
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26430102009-02-25 Development and Preliminary Evaluation of a Multivariate Index Assay for Ovarian Cancer Amonkar, Suraj D. Bertenshaw, Greg P. Chen, Tzong-Hao Bergstrom, Katharine J. Zhao, Jinghua Seshaiah, Partha Yip, Ping Mansfield, Brian C. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Most women with a clinical presentation consistent with ovarian cancer have benign conditions. Therefore methods to distinguish women with ovarian cancer from those with benign conditions would be beneficial. We describe the development and preliminary evaluation of a serum-based multivariate assay for ovarian cancer. This hypothesis-driven study examined whether an informative pattern could be detected in stage I disease that persists through later stages. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Sera, collected under uniform protocols from multiple institutions, representing 176 cases and 187 controls from women presenting for surgery were examined using high-throughput, multiplexed immunoassays. All stages and common subtypes of epithelial ovarian cancer, and the most common benign ovarian conditions were represented. A panel of 104 antigens, 44 autoimmune and 56 infectious disease markers were assayed and informative combinations identified. Using a training set of 91 stage I data sets, representing 61 individual samples, and an equivalent number of controls, an 11-analyte profile, composed of CA-125, CA 19-9, EGF-R, C-reactive protein, myoglobin, apolipoprotein A1, apolipoprotein CIII, MIP-1α, IL-6, IL-18 and tenascin C was identified and appears informative for all stages and common subtypes of ovarian cancer. Using a testing set of 245 samples, approximately twice the size of the model building set, the classifier had 91.3% sensitivity and 88.5% specificity. While these preliminary results are promising, further refinement and extensive validation of the classifier in a clinical trial is necessary to determine if the test has clinical value. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We describe a blood-based assay using 11 analytes that can distinguish women with ovarian cancer from those with benign conditions. Preliminary evaluation of the classifier suggests it has the potential to offer approximately 90% sensitivity and 90% specificity. While promising, the performance needs to be assessed in a blinded clinical validation study. Public Library of Science 2009-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC2643010/ /pubmed/19240799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004599 Text en Amonkar et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Amonkar, Suraj D.
Bertenshaw, Greg P.
Chen, Tzong-Hao
Bergstrom, Katharine J.
Zhao, Jinghua
Seshaiah, Partha
Yip, Ping
Mansfield, Brian C.
Development and Preliminary Evaluation of a Multivariate Index Assay for Ovarian Cancer
title Development and Preliminary Evaluation of a Multivariate Index Assay for Ovarian Cancer
title_full Development and Preliminary Evaluation of a Multivariate Index Assay for Ovarian Cancer
title_fullStr Development and Preliminary Evaluation of a Multivariate Index Assay for Ovarian Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Development and Preliminary Evaluation of a Multivariate Index Assay for Ovarian Cancer
title_short Development and Preliminary Evaluation of a Multivariate Index Assay for Ovarian Cancer
title_sort development and preliminary evaluation of a multivariate index assay for ovarian cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2643010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19240799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004599
work_keys_str_mv AT amonkarsurajd developmentandpreliminaryevaluationofamultivariateindexassayforovariancancer
AT bertenshawgregp developmentandpreliminaryevaluationofamultivariateindexassayforovariancancer
AT chentzonghao developmentandpreliminaryevaluationofamultivariateindexassayforovariancancer
AT bergstromkatharinej developmentandpreliminaryevaluationofamultivariateindexassayforovariancancer
AT zhaojinghua developmentandpreliminaryevaluationofamultivariateindexassayforovariancancer
AT seshaiahpartha developmentandpreliminaryevaluationofamultivariateindexassayforovariancancer
AT yipping developmentandpreliminaryevaluationofamultivariateindexassayforovariancancer
AT mansfieldbrianc developmentandpreliminaryevaluationofamultivariateindexassayforovariancancer