Cargando…
The script concordance test in radiation oncology: validation study of a new tool to assess clinical reasoning
BACKGROUND: The Script Concordance test (SCT) is a reliable and valid tool to evaluate clinical reasoning in complex situations where experts' opinions may be divided. Scores reflect the degree of concordance between the performance of examinees and that of a reference panel of experienced phys...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2644322/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19203358 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-4-7 |
_version_ | 1782164721662689280 |
---|---|
author | Lambert, Carole Gagnon, Robert Nguyen, David Charlin, Bernard |
author_facet | Lambert, Carole Gagnon, Robert Nguyen, David Charlin, Bernard |
author_sort | Lambert, Carole |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Script Concordance test (SCT) is a reliable and valid tool to evaluate clinical reasoning in complex situations where experts' opinions may be divided. Scores reflect the degree of concordance between the performance of examinees and that of a reference panel of experienced physicians. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate SCT's usefulness in radiation oncology. METHODS: A 90 items radiation oncology SCT was administered to 155 participants. Three levels of experience were tested: medical students (n = 70), radiation oncology residents (n = 38) and radiation oncologists (n = 47). Statistical tests were performed to assess reliability and to document validity. RESULTS: After item optimization, the test comprised 30 cases and 70 questions. Cronbach alpha was 0.90. Mean scores were 51.62 (± 8.19) for students, 71.20 (± 9.45) for residents and 76.67 (± 6.14) for radiation oncologists. The difference between the three groups was statistically significant when compared by the Kruskall-Wallis test (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The SCT is reliable and useful to discriminate among participants according to their level of experience in radiation oncology. It appears as a useful tool to document the progression of reasoning during residency training. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2644322 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26443222009-02-18 The script concordance test in radiation oncology: validation study of a new tool to assess clinical reasoning Lambert, Carole Gagnon, Robert Nguyen, David Charlin, Bernard Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The Script Concordance test (SCT) is a reliable and valid tool to evaluate clinical reasoning in complex situations where experts' opinions may be divided. Scores reflect the degree of concordance between the performance of examinees and that of a reference panel of experienced physicians. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate SCT's usefulness in radiation oncology. METHODS: A 90 items radiation oncology SCT was administered to 155 participants. Three levels of experience were tested: medical students (n = 70), radiation oncology residents (n = 38) and radiation oncologists (n = 47). Statistical tests were performed to assess reliability and to document validity. RESULTS: After item optimization, the test comprised 30 cases and 70 questions. Cronbach alpha was 0.90. Mean scores were 51.62 (± 8.19) for students, 71.20 (± 9.45) for residents and 76.67 (± 6.14) for radiation oncologists. The difference between the three groups was statistically significant when compared by the Kruskall-Wallis test (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The SCT is reliable and useful to discriminate among participants according to their level of experience in radiation oncology. It appears as a useful tool to document the progression of reasoning during residency training. BioMed Central 2009-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2644322/ /pubmed/19203358 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-4-7 Text en Copyright © 2009 Lambert et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Lambert, Carole Gagnon, Robert Nguyen, David Charlin, Bernard The script concordance test in radiation oncology: validation study of a new tool to assess clinical reasoning |
title | The script concordance test in radiation oncology: validation study of a new tool to assess clinical reasoning |
title_full | The script concordance test in radiation oncology: validation study of a new tool to assess clinical reasoning |
title_fullStr | The script concordance test in radiation oncology: validation study of a new tool to assess clinical reasoning |
title_full_unstemmed | The script concordance test in radiation oncology: validation study of a new tool to assess clinical reasoning |
title_short | The script concordance test in radiation oncology: validation study of a new tool to assess clinical reasoning |
title_sort | script concordance test in radiation oncology: validation study of a new tool to assess clinical reasoning |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2644322/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19203358 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-4-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lambertcarole thescriptconcordancetestinradiationoncologyvalidationstudyofanewtooltoassessclinicalreasoning AT gagnonrobert thescriptconcordancetestinradiationoncologyvalidationstudyofanewtooltoassessclinicalreasoning AT nguyendavid thescriptconcordancetestinradiationoncologyvalidationstudyofanewtooltoassessclinicalreasoning AT charlinbernard thescriptconcordancetestinradiationoncologyvalidationstudyofanewtooltoassessclinicalreasoning AT lambertcarole scriptconcordancetestinradiationoncologyvalidationstudyofanewtooltoassessclinicalreasoning AT gagnonrobert scriptconcordancetestinradiationoncologyvalidationstudyofanewtooltoassessclinicalreasoning AT nguyendavid scriptconcordancetestinradiationoncologyvalidationstudyofanewtooltoassessclinicalreasoning AT charlinbernard scriptconcordancetestinradiationoncologyvalidationstudyofanewtooltoassessclinicalreasoning |