Cargando…

The script concordance test in radiation oncology: validation study of a new tool to assess clinical reasoning

BACKGROUND: The Script Concordance test (SCT) is a reliable and valid tool to evaluate clinical reasoning in complex situations where experts' opinions may be divided. Scores reflect the degree of concordance between the performance of examinees and that of a reference panel of experienced phys...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lambert, Carole, Gagnon, Robert, Nguyen, David, Charlin, Bernard
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2644322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19203358
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-4-7
_version_ 1782164721662689280
author Lambert, Carole
Gagnon, Robert
Nguyen, David
Charlin, Bernard
author_facet Lambert, Carole
Gagnon, Robert
Nguyen, David
Charlin, Bernard
author_sort Lambert, Carole
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Script Concordance test (SCT) is a reliable and valid tool to evaluate clinical reasoning in complex situations where experts' opinions may be divided. Scores reflect the degree of concordance between the performance of examinees and that of a reference panel of experienced physicians. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate SCT's usefulness in radiation oncology. METHODS: A 90 items radiation oncology SCT was administered to 155 participants. Three levels of experience were tested: medical students (n = 70), radiation oncology residents (n = 38) and radiation oncologists (n = 47). Statistical tests were performed to assess reliability and to document validity. RESULTS: After item optimization, the test comprised 30 cases and 70 questions. Cronbach alpha was 0.90. Mean scores were 51.62 (± 8.19) for students, 71.20 (± 9.45) for residents and 76.67 (± 6.14) for radiation oncologists. The difference between the three groups was statistically significant when compared by the Kruskall-Wallis test (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The SCT is reliable and useful to discriminate among participants according to their level of experience in radiation oncology. It appears as a useful tool to document the progression of reasoning during residency training.
format Text
id pubmed-2644322
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26443222009-02-18 The script concordance test in radiation oncology: validation study of a new tool to assess clinical reasoning Lambert, Carole Gagnon, Robert Nguyen, David Charlin, Bernard Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The Script Concordance test (SCT) is a reliable and valid tool to evaluate clinical reasoning in complex situations where experts' opinions may be divided. Scores reflect the degree of concordance between the performance of examinees and that of a reference panel of experienced physicians. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate SCT's usefulness in radiation oncology. METHODS: A 90 items radiation oncology SCT was administered to 155 participants. Three levels of experience were tested: medical students (n = 70), radiation oncology residents (n = 38) and radiation oncologists (n = 47). Statistical tests were performed to assess reliability and to document validity. RESULTS: After item optimization, the test comprised 30 cases and 70 questions. Cronbach alpha was 0.90. Mean scores were 51.62 (± 8.19) for students, 71.20 (± 9.45) for residents and 76.67 (± 6.14) for radiation oncologists. The difference between the three groups was statistically significant when compared by the Kruskall-Wallis test (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The SCT is reliable and useful to discriminate among participants according to their level of experience in radiation oncology. It appears as a useful tool to document the progression of reasoning during residency training. BioMed Central 2009-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2644322/ /pubmed/19203358 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-4-7 Text en Copyright © 2009 Lambert et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Lambert, Carole
Gagnon, Robert
Nguyen, David
Charlin, Bernard
The script concordance test in radiation oncology: validation study of a new tool to assess clinical reasoning
title The script concordance test in radiation oncology: validation study of a new tool to assess clinical reasoning
title_full The script concordance test in radiation oncology: validation study of a new tool to assess clinical reasoning
title_fullStr The script concordance test in radiation oncology: validation study of a new tool to assess clinical reasoning
title_full_unstemmed The script concordance test in radiation oncology: validation study of a new tool to assess clinical reasoning
title_short The script concordance test in radiation oncology: validation study of a new tool to assess clinical reasoning
title_sort script concordance test in radiation oncology: validation study of a new tool to assess clinical reasoning
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2644322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19203358
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-4-7
work_keys_str_mv AT lambertcarole thescriptconcordancetestinradiationoncologyvalidationstudyofanewtooltoassessclinicalreasoning
AT gagnonrobert thescriptconcordancetestinradiationoncologyvalidationstudyofanewtooltoassessclinicalreasoning
AT nguyendavid thescriptconcordancetestinradiationoncologyvalidationstudyofanewtooltoassessclinicalreasoning
AT charlinbernard thescriptconcordancetestinradiationoncologyvalidationstudyofanewtooltoassessclinicalreasoning
AT lambertcarole scriptconcordancetestinradiationoncologyvalidationstudyofanewtooltoassessclinicalreasoning
AT gagnonrobert scriptconcordancetestinradiationoncologyvalidationstudyofanewtooltoassessclinicalreasoning
AT nguyendavid scriptconcordancetestinradiationoncologyvalidationstudyofanewtooltoassessclinicalreasoning
AT charlinbernard scriptconcordancetestinradiationoncologyvalidationstudyofanewtooltoassessclinicalreasoning