Cargando…

A framework for the organization and delivery of systemic treatment

BACKGROUND: Increasing systemic treatment and shortages of oncology professionals in Canada require innovative approaches to the safe and effective delivery of intravenous (IV) cancer treatment. We conducted a systematic review of the clinical and scientific literature, and an environmental scan of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vandenberg, T., Coakley, N., Nayler, J., DeGrasse, C., Green, E., Mackay, J.A., McLennan, C., Smith, A., Wilcock, L., Trudeau, M.E.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Multimed Inc. 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2644625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19229367
_version_ 1782164738316173312
author Vandenberg, T.
Coakley, N.
Nayler, J.
DeGrasse, C.
Green, E.
Mackay, J.A.
McLennan, C.
Smith, A.
Wilcock, L.
Trudeau, M.E.
author_facet Vandenberg, T.
Coakley, N.
Nayler, J.
DeGrasse, C.
Green, E.
Mackay, J.A.
McLennan, C.
Smith, A.
Wilcock, L.
Trudeau, M.E.
author_sort Vandenberg, T.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Increasing systemic treatment and shortages of oncology professionals in Canada require innovative approaches to the safe and effective delivery of intravenous (IV) cancer treatment. We conducted a systematic review of the clinical and scientific literature, and an environmental scan of models in Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand. We then developed a framework for the organization and delivery of IV systemic treatment. METHODS: The systematic review covered the medline, embase, cinahl, and HealthStar databases. The environmental scan retrieved published and unpublished sources, coupled with a free key word search using the Google search engine. The Systemic Treatment Working Group reviewed the evidence and developed a draft framework using evidence-based analysis, existing recommendations from various jurisdictions, and expert opinion based on experience and consensus. The draft was assessed by Ontario stakeholders and reviewed and approved by Cancer Care Ontario. RESULTS: The poor quantity and quality of the evidence necessitated a consensus-derived model. That model comprises four levels of care determined by a regional systemic treatment program and three integrated structures (integrated cancer programs, affiliate institutions, and satellite institutions), each with a defined scope of practice and a specific organizational framework. INTERPRETATION: New models of care are urgently required beyond large centres, particularly in geographically remote or rural areas. Despite limited applicable evidence, the development and successful implementation of this framework is intended to create sustainable, accessible, quality care and to measurably improve patient outcomes.
format Text
id pubmed-2644625
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Multimed Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26446252009-02-19 A framework for the organization and delivery of systemic treatment Vandenberg, T. Coakley, N. Nayler, J. DeGrasse, C. Green, E. Mackay, J.A. McLennan, C. Smith, A. Wilcock, L. Trudeau, M.E. Curr Oncol Practice Guideline Series BACKGROUND: Increasing systemic treatment and shortages of oncology professionals in Canada require innovative approaches to the safe and effective delivery of intravenous (IV) cancer treatment. We conducted a systematic review of the clinical and scientific literature, and an environmental scan of models in Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand. We then developed a framework for the organization and delivery of IV systemic treatment. METHODS: The systematic review covered the medline, embase, cinahl, and HealthStar databases. The environmental scan retrieved published and unpublished sources, coupled with a free key word search using the Google search engine. The Systemic Treatment Working Group reviewed the evidence and developed a draft framework using evidence-based analysis, existing recommendations from various jurisdictions, and expert opinion based on experience and consensus. The draft was assessed by Ontario stakeholders and reviewed and approved by Cancer Care Ontario. RESULTS: The poor quantity and quality of the evidence necessitated a consensus-derived model. That model comprises four levels of care determined by a regional systemic treatment program and three integrated structures (integrated cancer programs, affiliate institutions, and satellite institutions), each with a defined scope of practice and a specific organizational framework. INTERPRETATION: New models of care are urgently required beyond large centres, particularly in geographically remote or rural areas. Despite limited applicable evidence, the development and successful implementation of this framework is intended to create sustainable, accessible, quality care and to measurably improve patient outcomes. Multimed Inc. 2009-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2644625/ /pubmed/19229367 Text en 2009 Multimed Inc.
spellingShingle Practice Guideline Series
Vandenberg, T.
Coakley, N.
Nayler, J.
DeGrasse, C.
Green, E.
Mackay, J.A.
McLennan, C.
Smith, A.
Wilcock, L.
Trudeau, M.E.
A framework for the organization and delivery of systemic treatment
title A framework for the organization and delivery of systemic treatment
title_full A framework for the organization and delivery of systemic treatment
title_fullStr A framework for the organization and delivery of systemic treatment
title_full_unstemmed A framework for the organization and delivery of systemic treatment
title_short A framework for the organization and delivery of systemic treatment
title_sort framework for the organization and delivery of systemic treatment
topic Practice Guideline Series
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2644625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19229367
work_keys_str_mv AT vandenbergt aframeworkfortheorganizationanddeliveryofsystemictreatment
AT coakleyn aframeworkfortheorganizationanddeliveryofsystemictreatment
AT naylerj aframeworkfortheorganizationanddeliveryofsystemictreatment
AT degrassec aframeworkfortheorganizationanddeliveryofsystemictreatment
AT greene aframeworkfortheorganizationanddeliveryofsystemictreatment
AT mackayja aframeworkfortheorganizationanddeliveryofsystemictreatment
AT mclennanc aframeworkfortheorganizationanddeliveryofsystemictreatment
AT smitha aframeworkfortheorganizationanddeliveryofsystemictreatment
AT wilcockl aframeworkfortheorganizationanddeliveryofsystemictreatment
AT trudeaume aframeworkfortheorganizationanddeliveryofsystemictreatment
AT vandenbergt frameworkfortheorganizationanddeliveryofsystemictreatment
AT coakleyn frameworkfortheorganizationanddeliveryofsystemictreatment
AT naylerj frameworkfortheorganizationanddeliveryofsystemictreatment
AT degrassec frameworkfortheorganizationanddeliveryofsystemictreatment
AT greene frameworkfortheorganizationanddeliveryofsystemictreatment
AT mackayja frameworkfortheorganizationanddeliveryofsystemictreatment
AT mclennanc frameworkfortheorganizationanddeliveryofsystemictreatment
AT smitha frameworkfortheorganizationanddeliveryofsystemictreatment
AT wilcockl frameworkfortheorganizationanddeliveryofsystemictreatment
AT trudeaume frameworkfortheorganizationanddeliveryofsystemictreatment