Cargando…

A procedure to correct proxy-reported weight in the National Health Interview Survey, 1976–2002

BACKGROUND: Data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) show a larger-than-expected increase in mean BMI between 1996 and 1997. Proxy-reports of height and weight were discontinued as part of the 1997 NHIS redesign, suggesting that the sharp increase between 1996 and 1997 may be artifactua...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reither, Eric N, Utz, Rebecca L
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2645356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19126232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7954-7-2
_version_ 1782164771713318912
author Reither, Eric N
Utz, Rebecca L
author_facet Reither, Eric N
Utz, Rebecca L
author_sort Reither, Eric N
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) show a larger-than-expected increase in mean BMI between 1996 and 1997. Proxy-reports of height and weight were discontinued as part of the 1997 NHIS redesign, suggesting that the sharp increase between 1996 and 1997 may be artifactual. METHODS: We merged NHIS data from 1976–2002 into a single database consisting of approximately 1.7 million adults aged 18 and over. The analysis consisted of two parts: First, we estimated the magnitude of BMI differences by reporting status (i.e., self-reported versus proxy-reported height and weight). Second, we developed a procedure to correct biases in BMI introduced by reporting status. RESULTS: Our analyses confirmed that proxy-reports of weight tended to be biased downward, with the degree of bias varying by race, sex, and other characteristics. We developed a correction procedure to minimize BMI underestimation associated with proxy-reporting, substantially reducing the larger-than-expected increase found in NHIS data between 1996 and 1997. CONCLUSION: It is imperative that researchers who use reported estimates of height and weight think carefully about flaws in their data and how existing correction procedures might fail to account for them. The development of this particular correction procedure represents an important step toward improving the quality of BMI estimates in a widely used source of epidemiologic data.
format Text
id pubmed-2645356
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26453562009-02-20 A procedure to correct proxy-reported weight in the National Health Interview Survey, 1976–2002 Reither, Eric N Utz, Rebecca L Popul Health Metr Research BACKGROUND: Data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) show a larger-than-expected increase in mean BMI between 1996 and 1997. Proxy-reports of height and weight were discontinued as part of the 1997 NHIS redesign, suggesting that the sharp increase between 1996 and 1997 may be artifactual. METHODS: We merged NHIS data from 1976–2002 into a single database consisting of approximately 1.7 million adults aged 18 and over. The analysis consisted of two parts: First, we estimated the magnitude of BMI differences by reporting status (i.e., self-reported versus proxy-reported height and weight). Second, we developed a procedure to correct biases in BMI introduced by reporting status. RESULTS: Our analyses confirmed that proxy-reports of weight tended to be biased downward, with the degree of bias varying by race, sex, and other characteristics. We developed a correction procedure to minimize BMI underestimation associated with proxy-reporting, substantially reducing the larger-than-expected increase found in NHIS data between 1996 and 1997. CONCLUSION: It is imperative that researchers who use reported estimates of height and weight think carefully about flaws in their data and how existing correction procedures might fail to account for them. The development of this particular correction procedure represents an important step toward improving the quality of BMI estimates in a widely used source of epidemiologic data. BioMed Central 2009-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2645356/ /pubmed/19126232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7954-7-2 Text en Copyright © 2009 Reither and Utz; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Reither, Eric N
Utz, Rebecca L
A procedure to correct proxy-reported weight in the National Health Interview Survey, 1976–2002
title A procedure to correct proxy-reported weight in the National Health Interview Survey, 1976–2002
title_full A procedure to correct proxy-reported weight in the National Health Interview Survey, 1976–2002
title_fullStr A procedure to correct proxy-reported weight in the National Health Interview Survey, 1976–2002
title_full_unstemmed A procedure to correct proxy-reported weight in the National Health Interview Survey, 1976–2002
title_short A procedure to correct proxy-reported weight in the National Health Interview Survey, 1976–2002
title_sort procedure to correct proxy-reported weight in the national health interview survey, 1976–2002
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2645356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19126232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7954-7-2
work_keys_str_mv AT reitherericn aproceduretocorrectproxyreportedweightinthenationalhealthinterviewsurvey19762002
AT utzrebeccal aproceduretocorrectproxyreportedweightinthenationalhealthinterviewsurvey19762002
AT reitherericn proceduretocorrectproxyreportedweightinthenationalhealthinterviewsurvey19762002
AT utzrebeccal proceduretocorrectproxyreportedweightinthenationalhealthinterviewsurvey19762002