Cargando…

Determination of patient-specific internal gross tumor volumes for lung cancer using four-dimensional computed tomography

BACKGROUND: To determine the optimal approach to delineating patient-specific internal gross target volumes (IGTV) from four-dimensional (4-D) computed tomography (CT) image data sets used in the planning of radiation treatment for lung cancers. METHODS: We analyzed 4D-CT image data sets of 27 conse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ezhil, Muthuveni, Vedam, Sastry, Balter, Peter, Choi, Bum, Mirkovic, Dragan, Starkschall, George, Chang, Joe Y
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2645420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19173738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-4-4
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: To determine the optimal approach to delineating patient-specific internal gross target volumes (IGTV) from four-dimensional (4-D) computed tomography (CT) image data sets used in the planning of radiation treatment for lung cancers. METHODS: We analyzed 4D-CT image data sets of 27 consecutive patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (stage I: 17, stage III: 10). The IGTV, defined to be the envelope of respiratory motion of the gross tumor volume in each 4D-CT data set was delineated manually using four techniques: (1) combining the gross tumor volume (GTV) contours from ten respiratory phases (IGTV(AllPhases)); (2) combining the GTV contours from two extreme respiratory phases (0% and 50%) (IGTV(2Phases)); (3) defining the GTV contour using the maximum intensity projection (MIP) (IGTV(MIP)); and (4) defining the GTV contour using the MIP with modification based on visual verification of contours in individual respiratory phase (IGTV(MIP-Modified)). Using the IGTV(AllPhases )as the optimum IGTV, we compared volumes, matching indices, and extent of target missing using the IGTVs based on the other three approaches. RESULTS: The IGTV(MIP )and IGTV(2Phases )were significantly smaller than the IGTV(AllPhases )(p < 0.006 for stage I and p < 0.002 for stage III). However, the values of the IGTV(MIP-Modified )were close to those determined from IGTV(AllPhases )(p = 0.08). IGTV(MIP-Modified )also matched the best with IGTV(AllPhases). CONCLUSION: IGTV(MIP )and IGTV(2Phases )underestimate IGTVs. IGTV(MIP-Modified )is recommended to improve IGTV delineation in lung cancer.