Cargando…

Escherichia coli genes affecting recipient ability in plasmid conjugation: Are there any?

BACKGROUND: How does the recipient cell contribute to bacterial conjugation? To answer this question we systematically analyzed the individual contribution of each Escherichia coli gene in matings using plasmid R388 as a conjugative plasmid. We used an automated conjugation assay and two sets of E....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pérez-Mendoza, Daniel, de la Cruz, Fernando
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2645431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19203375
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-71
_version_ 1782164787821543424
author Pérez-Mendoza, Daniel
de la Cruz, Fernando
author_facet Pérez-Mendoza, Daniel
de la Cruz, Fernando
author_sort Pérez-Mendoza, Daniel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: How does the recipient cell contribute to bacterial conjugation? To answer this question we systematically analyzed the individual contribution of each Escherichia coli gene in matings using plasmid R388 as a conjugative plasmid. We used an automated conjugation assay and two sets of E. coli mutant collections: the Keio collection (3,908 E. coli single-gene deletion mutants) and a collection of 20,000 random mini-Tn10::Km insertion mutants in E. coli strain DH5α. The combined use of both collections assured that we screened > 99% of the E. coli non-essential genes in our survey. RESULTS: Results indicate that no non-essential recipient E. coli genes exist that play an essential role in conjugation. Mutations in the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) synthesis pathway had a modest effect on R388 plasmid transfer (6 – 32% of wild type). The same mutations showed a drastic inhibition effect on F-plasmid transfer, but only in liquid matings, suggesting that previously isolated conjugation-defective mutants do in fact impair mating pair formation in liquid mating, but not conjugative DNA processing or transport per se. CONCLUSION: We conclude from our genome-wide screen that recipient bacterial cells cannot avoid being used as recipients in bacterial conjugation. This is relevant as an indication of the problems in curbing the dissemination of antibiotic resistance and suggests that conjugation acts as a pure drilling machine, with little regard to the constitution of the recipient cell.
format Text
id pubmed-2645431
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26454312009-02-20 Escherichia coli genes affecting recipient ability in plasmid conjugation: Are there any? Pérez-Mendoza, Daniel de la Cruz, Fernando BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: How does the recipient cell contribute to bacterial conjugation? To answer this question we systematically analyzed the individual contribution of each Escherichia coli gene in matings using plasmid R388 as a conjugative plasmid. We used an automated conjugation assay and two sets of E. coli mutant collections: the Keio collection (3,908 E. coli single-gene deletion mutants) and a collection of 20,000 random mini-Tn10::Km insertion mutants in E. coli strain DH5α. The combined use of both collections assured that we screened > 99% of the E. coli non-essential genes in our survey. RESULTS: Results indicate that no non-essential recipient E. coli genes exist that play an essential role in conjugation. Mutations in the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) synthesis pathway had a modest effect on R388 plasmid transfer (6 – 32% of wild type). The same mutations showed a drastic inhibition effect on F-plasmid transfer, but only in liquid matings, suggesting that previously isolated conjugation-defective mutants do in fact impair mating pair formation in liquid mating, but not conjugative DNA processing or transport per se. CONCLUSION: We conclude from our genome-wide screen that recipient bacterial cells cannot avoid being used as recipients in bacterial conjugation. This is relevant as an indication of the problems in curbing the dissemination of antibiotic resistance and suggests that conjugation acts as a pure drilling machine, with little regard to the constitution of the recipient cell. BioMed Central 2009-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2645431/ /pubmed/19203375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-71 Text en Copyright © 2009 Pérez-Mendoza and de la Cruz; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pérez-Mendoza, Daniel
de la Cruz, Fernando
Escherichia coli genes affecting recipient ability in plasmid conjugation: Are there any?
title Escherichia coli genes affecting recipient ability in plasmid conjugation: Are there any?
title_full Escherichia coli genes affecting recipient ability in plasmid conjugation: Are there any?
title_fullStr Escherichia coli genes affecting recipient ability in plasmid conjugation: Are there any?
title_full_unstemmed Escherichia coli genes affecting recipient ability in plasmid conjugation: Are there any?
title_short Escherichia coli genes affecting recipient ability in plasmid conjugation: Are there any?
title_sort escherichia coli genes affecting recipient ability in plasmid conjugation: are there any?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2645431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19203375
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-71
work_keys_str_mv AT perezmendozadaniel escherichiacoligenesaffectingrecipientabilityinplasmidconjugationarethereany
AT delacruzfernando escherichiacoligenesaffectingrecipientabilityinplasmidconjugationarethereany