Cargando…

Effects of Neuraxial Blockade May Be Difficult To Study Using Large Randomized Controlled Trials: The PeriOperative Epidural Trial (POET) Pilot Study

BACKGROUND: Early randomized controlled trials have suggested that neuraxial blockade may reduce cardiorespiratory complications after non-cardiothoracic surgery, but recent larger trials have been inconclusive. We conducted a pilot study to assess the feasibility of conducting a large multicentre r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Peter T., Beattie, W. Scott, Bryson, Gregory L., Paul, James E., Yang, Homer
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2645707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19247497
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004644
_version_ 1782164799107366912
author Choi, Peter T.
Beattie, W. Scott
Bryson, Gregory L.
Paul, James E.
Yang, Homer
author_facet Choi, Peter T.
Beattie, W. Scott
Bryson, Gregory L.
Paul, James E.
Yang, Homer
author_sort Choi, Peter T.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Early randomized controlled trials have suggested that neuraxial blockade may reduce cardiorespiratory complications after non-cardiothoracic surgery, but recent larger trials have been inconclusive. We conducted a pilot study to assess the feasibility of conducting a large multicentre randomized controlled trial in Canada. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: After Research Ethics Board approvals from the participating institutions, subjects were recruited if they were ≥45 years old, had an expected hospital stay ≥48 hours, were undergoing a noncardiothoracic procedure amenable to epidural analgesia, met one of six risk criteria, and did not have contraindications to neuraxial blockade. After informed consent, subjects were randomly allocated to combined epidural analgesia (epidural group) and neuraxial anesthesia, with or without general anesthesia, or intravenous opioid analgesia (IV group) and general anesthesia. The primary outcomes were the rate of recruitment and the percents of eligible patients recruited, crossed over, and followed completely. Feasibility targets were defined a priori. A blinded, independent committee adjudicated the secondary clinical outcomes. Subjects were followed daily while in hospital and then at 30 days after surgery. Analysis was intention-to-treat. Over a 15-month period, the recruitment rate was 0.5±0.3 (mean±SEM) subjects per week per centre; 112/494 (22.7%) eligible subjects were recruited at four tertiary-care teaching hospitals in Canada. Thirteen (26.5%) of 49 subjects in the epidural group crossed over to the IV group; seven (14.3%) were due to failed or inadequate analgesia or complications from epidural analgesia. Five (9.8%) of 51 subjects in the IV group crossed over to the epidural group but none were due to inadequate analgesia or complications. Ninety-eight (97.0%) of 101 subjects were successfully followed up until 30 days after their surgery. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Of the criteria we defined for the feasibility of a full-scale trial, only the follow-up target was met. The other feasibility outcomes did not meet our preset criteria for success. The results suggest that a large multicentre trial may not be a feasible design to study the perioperative effects of neuraxial blockade. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT 0221260 Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN 35629817
format Text
id pubmed-2645707
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26457072009-02-27 Effects of Neuraxial Blockade May Be Difficult To Study Using Large Randomized Controlled Trials: The PeriOperative Epidural Trial (POET) Pilot Study Choi, Peter T. Beattie, W. Scott Bryson, Gregory L. Paul, James E. Yang, Homer PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Early randomized controlled trials have suggested that neuraxial blockade may reduce cardiorespiratory complications after non-cardiothoracic surgery, but recent larger trials have been inconclusive. We conducted a pilot study to assess the feasibility of conducting a large multicentre randomized controlled trial in Canada. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: After Research Ethics Board approvals from the participating institutions, subjects were recruited if they were ≥45 years old, had an expected hospital stay ≥48 hours, were undergoing a noncardiothoracic procedure amenable to epidural analgesia, met one of six risk criteria, and did not have contraindications to neuraxial blockade. After informed consent, subjects were randomly allocated to combined epidural analgesia (epidural group) and neuraxial anesthesia, with or without general anesthesia, or intravenous opioid analgesia (IV group) and general anesthesia. The primary outcomes were the rate of recruitment and the percents of eligible patients recruited, crossed over, and followed completely. Feasibility targets were defined a priori. A blinded, independent committee adjudicated the secondary clinical outcomes. Subjects were followed daily while in hospital and then at 30 days after surgery. Analysis was intention-to-treat. Over a 15-month period, the recruitment rate was 0.5±0.3 (mean±SEM) subjects per week per centre; 112/494 (22.7%) eligible subjects were recruited at four tertiary-care teaching hospitals in Canada. Thirteen (26.5%) of 49 subjects in the epidural group crossed over to the IV group; seven (14.3%) were due to failed or inadequate analgesia or complications from epidural analgesia. Five (9.8%) of 51 subjects in the IV group crossed over to the epidural group but none were due to inadequate analgesia or complications. Ninety-eight (97.0%) of 101 subjects were successfully followed up until 30 days after their surgery. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Of the criteria we defined for the feasibility of a full-scale trial, only the follow-up target was met. The other feasibility outcomes did not meet our preset criteria for success. The results suggest that a large multicentre trial may not be a feasible design to study the perioperative effects of neuraxial blockade. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT 0221260 Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN 35629817 Public Library of Science 2009-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC2645707/ /pubmed/19247497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004644 Text en Choi et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Choi, Peter T.
Beattie, W. Scott
Bryson, Gregory L.
Paul, James E.
Yang, Homer
Effects of Neuraxial Blockade May Be Difficult To Study Using Large Randomized Controlled Trials: The PeriOperative Epidural Trial (POET) Pilot Study
title Effects of Neuraxial Blockade May Be Difficult To Study Using Large Randomized Controlled Trials: The PeriOperative Epidural Trial (POET) Pilot Study
title_full Effects of Neuraxial Blockade May Be Difficult To Study Using Large Randomized Controlled Trials: The PeriOperative Epidural Trial (POET) Pilot Study
title_fullStr Effects of Neuraxial Blockade May Be Difficult To Study Using Large Randomized Controlled Trials: The PeriOperative Epidural Trial (POET) Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Neuraxial Blockade May Be Difficult To Study Using Large Randomized Controlled Trials: The PeriOperative Epidural Trial (POET) Pilot Study
title_short Effects of Neuraxial Blockade May Be Difficult To Study Using Large Randomized Controlled Trials: The PeriOperative Epidural Trial (POET) Pilot Study
title_sort effects of neuraxial blockade may be difficult to study using large randomized controlled trials: the perioperative epidural trial (poet) pilot study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2645707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19247497
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004644
work_keys_str_mv AT choipetert effectsofneuraxialblockademaybedifficulttostudyusinglargerandomizedcontrolledtrialstheperioperativeepiduraltrialpoetpilotstudy
AT beattiewscott effectsofneuraxialblockademaybedifficulttostudyusinglargerandomizedcontrolledtrialstheperioperativeepiduraltrialpoetpilotstudy
AT brysongregoryl effectsofneuraxialblockademaybedifficulttostudyusinglargerandomizedcontrolledtrialstheperioperativeepiduraltrialpoetpilotstudy
AT pauljamese effectsofneuraxialblockademaybedifficulttostudyusinglargerandomizedcontrolledtrialstheperioperativeepiduraltrialpoetpilotstudy
AT yanghomer effectsofneuraxialblockademaybedifficulttostudyusinglargerandomizedcontrolledtrialstheperioperativeepiduraltrialpoetpilotstudy