Cargando…

Bimodal Distribution of Glucose Is Not Universally Useful for Diagnosing Diabetes

OBJECTIVE—Bimodality in the distribution of glucose has been used to define the cut point for the diagnosis of diabetes. Previous studies on bimodality have primarily been in populations with a high prevalence of type 2 diabetes, including one study in a white Caucasian population. All studies inclu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vistisen, Dorte, Colagiuri, Stephen, Borch-Johnsen, Knut
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Diabetes Association 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2646016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19074990
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc08-0867
_version_ 1782164806617268224
author Vistisen, Dorte
Colagiuri, Stephen
Borch-Johnsen, Knut
author_facet Vistisen, Dorte
Colagiuri, Stephen
Borch-Johnsen, Knut
author_sort Vistisen, Dorte
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE—Bimodality in the distribution of glucose has been used to define the cut point for the diagnosis of diabetes. Previous studies on bimodality have primarily been in populations with a high prevalence of type 2 diabetes, including one study in a white Caucasian population. All studies included participants with known diabetes. The aim of this study was to assess whether a bimodal structure is a general phenomenon in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and 2-h plasma glucose that is useful for deriving a common cut point for diabetes in populations of different origin, both including and excluding known diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—The Evaluation of Screening and Early Detection Strategies for Type 2 Diabetes and Impaired Glucose Tolerance (DETECT-2) project is an international collaboration pooling surveys from all continents. These studies include surveys in which plasma glucose was measured during an oral glucose tolerance test; in total, 43 studies (135,383 participants) from 27 countries were included. A mixture of two normal distributions was fitted to plasma glucose levels, and a cut point for normal glycemia was estimated as their intersection. In populations with a biologically meaningful cut point, bimodality was tested for significance. RESULTS—Distributions of FPG and 2-h plasma glucose did not, in general, produce bimodal structures useful for deriving cut points for diabetes. When present, the cut points produced were inconsistent over geographical regions. CONCLUSIONS—Deriving cut points for normal glycemia from distributions of FPG and 2-h plasma glucose does not appear to be suitable for defining diagnostic cut points for diabetes.
format Text
id pubmed-2646016
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher American Diabetes Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26460162010-03-01 Bimodal Distribution of Glucose Is Not Universally Useful for Diagnosing Diabetes Vistisen, Dorte Colagiuri, Stephen Borch-Johnsen, Knut Diabetes Care Epidemiology/Health Services Research OBJECTIVE—Bimodality in the distribution of glucose has been used to define the cut point for the diagnosis of diabetes. Previous studies on bimodality have primarily been in populations with a high prevalence of type 2 diabetes, including one study in a white Caucasian population. All studies included participants with known diabetes. The aim of this study was to assess whether a bimodal structure is a general phenomenon in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and 2-h plasma glucose that is useful for deriving a common cut point for diabetes in populations of different origin, both including and excluding known diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—The Evaluation of Screening and Early Detection Strategies for Type 2 Diabetes and Impaired Glucose Tolerance (DETECT-2) project is an international collaboration pooling surveys from all continents. These studies include surveys in which plasma glucose was measured during an oral glucose tolerance test; in total, 43 studies (135,383 participants) from 27 countries were included. A mixture of two normal distributions was fitted to plasma glucose levels, and a cut point for normal glycemia was estimated as their intersection. In populations with a biologically meaningful cut point, bimodality was tested for significance. RESULTS—Distributions of FPG and 2-h plasma glucose did not, in general, produce bimodal structures useful for deriving cut points for diabetes. When present, the cut points produced were inconsistent over geographical regions. CONCLUSIONS—Deriving cut points for normal glycemia from distributions of FPG and 2-h plasma glucose does not appear to be suitable for defining diagnostic cut points for diabetes. American Diabetes Association 2009-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2646016/ /pubmed/19074990 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc08-0867 Text en Copyright © 2009, American Diabetes Association Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details.
spellingShingle Epidemiology/Health Services Research
Vistisen, Dorte
Colagiuri, Stephen
Borch-Johnsen, Knut
Bimodal Distribution of Glucose Is Not Universally Useful for Diagnosing Diabetes
title Bimodal Distribution of Glucose Is Not Universally Useful for Diagnosing Diabetes
title_full Bimodal Distribution of Glucose Is Not Universally Useful for Diagnosing Diabetes
title_fullStr Bimodal Distribution of Glucose Is Not Universally Useful for Diagnosing Diabetes
title_full_unstemmed Bimodal Distribution of Glucose Is Not Universally Useful for Diagnosing Diabetes
title_short Bimodal Distribution of Glucose Is Not Universally Useful for Diagnosing Diabetes
title_sort bimodal distribution of glucose is not universally useful for diagnosing diabetes
topic Epidemiology/Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2646016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19074990
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc08-0867
work_keys_str_mv AT vistisendorte bimodaldistributionofglucoseisnotuniversallyusefulfordiagnosingdiabetes
AT colagiuristephen bimodaldistributionofglucoseisnotuniversallyusefulfordiagnosingdiabetes
AT borchjohnsenknut bimodaldistributionofglucoseisnotuniversallyusefulfordiagnosingdiabetes
AT bimodaldistributionofglucoseisnotuniversallyusefulfordiagnosingdiabetes