Cargando…
End-expiratory lung volume during mechanical ventilation: a comparison with reference values and the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure in intensive care unit patients with different lung conditions
INTRODUCTION: Functional residual capacity (FRC) reference values are obtained from spontaneous breathing patients, and are measured in the sitting or standing position. During mechanical ventilation FRC is determined by the level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), and it is therefore bette...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2646307/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19021898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc7125 |
_version_ | 1782164842998661120 |
---|---|
author | Bikker, Ido G van Bommel, Jasper Miranda, Dinis Reis Bakker, Jan Gommers, Diederik |
author_facet | Bikker, Ido G van Bommel, Jasper Miranda, Dinis Reis Bakker, Jan Gommers, Diederik |
author_sort | Bikker, Ido G |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Functional residual capacity (FRC) reference values are obtained from spontaneous breathing patients, and are measured in the sitting or standing position. During mechanical ventilation FRC is determined by the level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), and it is therefore better to speak of end-expiratory lung volume. Application of higher levels of PEEP leads to increased end-expiratory lung volume as a result of recruitment or further distention of already ventilated alveoli. The aim of this study was to measure end-expiratory lung volume in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit (ICU) patients with different types of lung pathology at different PEEP levels, and to compare them with predicted sitting FRC values, arterial oxygenation, and compliance values. METHODS: End-expiratory lung volume measurements were performed at PEEP levels reduced sequentially (15, 10 and then 5 cmH(2)O) in 45 mechanically ventilated patients divided into three groups according to pulmonary condition: normal lungs (group N), primary lung disorder (group P), and secondary lung disorder (group S). RESULTS: In all three groups, end-expiratory lung volume decreased significantly (P < 0.001) while PEEP decreased from 15 to 5 cmH(2)O, whereas the ratio of arterial oxygen tension to inspired oxygen fraction did not change. At 5 cmH(2)O PEEP, end-expiratory lung volume was 31, 20, and 17 ml/kg predicted body weight in groups N, P, and S, respectively. These measured values were only 66%, 42%, and 34% of the predicted sitting FRC. A correlation between change in end-expiratory lung volume and change in dynamic compliance was found in group S (P < 0.001; R(2 )= 0.52), but not in the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: End-expiratory lung volume measured at 5 cmH(2)O PEEP was markedly lower than predicted sitting FRC values in all groups. Only in patients with secondary lung disorders were PEEP-induced changes in end-expiratory lung volume the result of derecruitment. In combination with compliance, end-expiratory lung volume can provide additional information to optimize the ventilator settings. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2646307 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26463072009-02-24 End-expiratory lung volume during mechanical ventilation: a comparison with reference values and the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure in intensive care unit patients with different lung conditions Bikker, Ido G van Bommel, Jasper Miranda, Dinis Reis Bakker, Jan Gommers, Diederik Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Functional residual capacity (FRC) reference values are obtained from spontaneous breathing patients, and are measured in the sitting or standing position. During mechanical ventilation FRC is determined by the level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), and it is therefore better to speak of end-expiratory lung volume. Application of higher levels of PEEP leads to increased end-expiratory lung volume as a result of recruitment or further distention of already ventilated alveoli. The aim of this study was to measure end-expiratory lung volume in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit (ICU) patients with different types of lung pathology at different PEEP levels, and to compare them with predicted sitting FRC values, arterial oxygenation, and compliance values. METHODS: End-expiratory lung volume measurements were performed at PEEP levels reduced sequentially (15, 10 and then 5 cmH(2)O) in 45 mechanically ventilated patients divided into three groups according to pulmonary condition: normal lungs (group N), primary lung disorder (group P), and secondary lung disorder (group S). RESULTS: In all three groups, end-expiratory lung volume decreased significantly (P < 0.001) while PEEP decreased from 15 to 5 cmH(2)O, whereas the ratio of arterial oxygen tension to inspired oxygen fraction did not change. At 5 cmH(2)O PEEP, end-expiratory lung volume was 31, 20, and 17 ml/kg predicted body weight in groups N, P, and S, respectively. These measured values were only 66%, 42%, and 34% of the predicted sitting FRC. A correlation between change in end-expiratory lung volume and change in dynamic compliance was found in group S (P < 0.001; R(2 )= 0.52), but not in the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: End-expiratory lung volume measured at 5 cmH(2)O PEEP was markedly lower than predicted sitting FRC values in all groups. Only in patients with secondary lung disorders were PEEP-induced changes in end-expiratory lung volume the result of derecruitment. In combination with compliance, end-expiratory lung volume can provide additional information to optimize the ventilator settings. BioMed Central 2008 2008-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2646307/ /pubmed/19021898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc7125 Text en Copyright © 2008 Bikker et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Bikker, Ido G van Bommel, Jasper Miranda, Dinis Reis Bakker, Jan Gommers, Diederik End-expiratory lung volume during mechanical ventilation: a comparison with reference values and the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure in intensive care unit patients with different lung conditions |
title | End-expiratory lung volume during mechanical ventilation: a comparison with reference values and the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure in intensive care unit patients with different lung conditions |
title_full | End-expiratory lung volume during mechanical ventilation: a comparison with reference values and the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure in intensive care unit patients with different lung conditions |
title_fullStr | End-expiratory lung volume during mechanical ventilation: a comparison with reference values and the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure in intensive care unit patients with different lung conditions |
title_full_unstemmed | End-expiratory lung volume during mechanical ventilation: a comparison with reference values and the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure in intensive care unit patients with different lung conditions |
title_short | End-expiratory lung volume during mechanical ventilation: a comparison with reference values and the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure in intensive care unit patients with different lung conditions |
title_sort | end-expiratory lung volume during mechanical ventilation: a comparison with reference values and the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure in intensive care unit patients with different lung conditions |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2646307/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19021898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc7125 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bikkeridog endexpiratorylungvolumeduringmechanicalventilationacomparisonwithreferencevaluesandtheeffectofpositiveendexpiratorypressureinintensivecareunitpatientswithdifferentlungconditions AT vanbommeljasper endexpiratorylungvolumeduringmechanicalventilationacomparisonwithreferencevaluesandtheeffectofpositiveendexpiratorypressureinintensivecareunitpatientswithdifferentlungconditions AT mirandadinisreis endexpiratorylungvolumeduringmechanicalventilationacomparisonwithreferencevaluesandtheeffectofpositiveendexpiratorypressureinintensivecareunitpatientswithdifferentlungconditions AT bakkerjan endexpiratorylungvolumeduringmechanicalventilationacomparisonwithreferencevaluesandtheeffectofpositiveendexpiratorypressureinintensivecareunitpatientswithdifferentlungconditions AT gommersdiederik endexpiratorylungvolumeduringmechanicalventilationacomparisonwithreferencevaluesandtheeffectofpositiveendexpiratorypressureinintensivecareunitpatientswithdifferentlungconditions |