Cargando…

End-expiratory lung volume during mechanical ventilation: a comparison with reference values and the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure in intensive care unit patients with different lung conditions

INTRODUCTION: Functional residual capacity (FRC) reference values are obtained from spontaneous breathing patients, and are measured in the sitting or standing position. During mechanical ventilation FRC is determined by the level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), and it is therefore bette...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bikker, Ido G, van Bommel, Jasper, Miranda, Dinis Reis, Bakker, Jan, Gommers, Diederik
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2646307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19021898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc7125
_version_ 1782164842998661120
author Bikker, Ido G
van Bommel, Jasper
Miranda, Dinis Reis
Bakker, Jan
Gommers, Diederik
author_facet Bikker, Ido G
van Bommel, Jasper
Miranda, Dinis Reis
Bakker, Jan
Gommers, Diederik
author_sort Bikker, Ido G
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Functional residual capacity (FRC) reference values are obtained from spontaneous breathing patients, and are measured in the sitting or standing position. During mechanical ventilation FRC is determined by the level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), and it is therefore better to speak of end-expiratory lung volume. Application of higher levels of PEEP leads to increased end-expiratory lung volume as a result of recruitment or further distention of already ventilated alveoli. The aim of this study was to measure end-expiratory lung volume in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit (ICU) patients with different types of lung pathology at different PEEP levels, and to compare them with predicted sitting FRC values, arterial oxygenation, and compliance values. METHODS: End-expiratory lung volume measurements were performed at PEEP levels reduced sequentially (15, 10 and then 5 cmH(2)O) in 45 mechanically ventilated patients divided into three groups according to pulmonary condition: normal lungs (group N), primary lung disorder (group P), and secondary lung disorder (group S). RESULTS: In all three groups, end-expiratory lung volume decreased significantly (P < 0.001) while PEEP decreased from 15 to 5 cmH(2)O, whereas the ratio of arterial oxygen tension to inspired oxygen fraction did not change. At 5 cmH(2)O PEEP, end-expiratory lung volume was 31, 20, and 17 ml/kg predicted body weight in groups N, P, and S, respectively. These measured values were only 66%, 42%, and 34% of the predicted sitting FRC. A correlation between change in end-expiratory lung volume and change in dynamic compliance was found in group S (P < 0.001; R(2 )= 0.52), but not in the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: End-expiratory lung volume measured at 5 cmH(2)O PEEP was markedly lower than predicted sitting FRC values in all groups. Only in patients with secondary lung disorders were PEEP-induced changes in end-expiratory lung volume the result of derecruitment. In combination with compliance, end-expiratory lung volume can provide additional information to optimize the ventilator settings.
format Text
id pubmed-2646307
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26463072009-02-24 End-expiratory lung volume during mechanical ventilation: a comparison with reference values and the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure in intensive care unit patients with different lung conditions Bikker, Ido G van Bommel, Jasper Miranda, Dinis Reis Bakker, Jan Gommers, Diederik Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Functional residual capacity (FRC) reference values are obtained from spontaneous breathing patients, and are measured in the sitting or standing position. During mechanical ventilation FRC is determined by the level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), and it is therefore better to speak of end-expiratory lung volume. Application of higher levels of PEEP leads to increased end-expiratory lung volume as a result of recruitment or further distention of already ventilated alveoli. The aim of this study was to measure end-expiratory lung volume in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit (ICU) patients with different types of lung pathology at different PEEP levels, and to compare them with predicted sitting FRC values, arterial oxygenation, and compliance values. METHODS: End-expiratory lung volume measurements were performed at PEEP levels reduced sequentially (15, 10 and then 5 cmH(2)O) in 45 mechanically ventilated patients divided into three groups according to pulmonary condition: normal lungs (group N), primary lung disorder (group P), and secondary lung disorder (group S). RESULTS: In all three groups, end-expiratory lung volume decreased significantly (P < 0.001) while PEEP decreased from 15 to 5 cmH(2)O, whereas the ratio of arterial oxygen tension to inspired oxygen fraction did not change. At 5 cmH(2)O PEEP, end-expiratory lung volume was 31, 20, and 17 ml/kg predicted body weight in groups N, P, and S, respectively. These measured values were only 66%, 42%, and 34% of the predicted sitting FRC. A correlation between change in end-expiratory lung volume and change in dynamic compliance was found in group S (P < 0.001; R(2 )= 0.52), but not in the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: End-expiratory lung volume measured at 5 cmH(2)O PEEP was markedly lower than predicted sitting FRC values in all groups. Only in patients with secondary lung disorders were PEEP-induced changes in end-expiratory lung volume the result of derecruitment. In combination with compliance, end-expiratory lung volume can provide additional information to optimize the ventilator settings. BioMed Central 2008 2008-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2646307/ /pubmed/19021898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc7125 Text en Copyright © 2008 Bikker et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Bikker, Ido G
van Bommel, Jasper
Miranda, Dinis Reis
Bakker, Jan
Gommers, Diederik
End-expiratory lung volume during mechanical ventilation: a comparison with reference values and the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure in intensive care unit patients with different lung conditions
title End-expiratory lung volume during mechanical ventilation: a comparison with reference values and the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure in intensive care unit patients with different lung conditions
title_full End-expiratory lung volume during mechanical ventilation: a comparison with reference values and the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure in intensive care unit patients with different lung conditions
title_fullStr End-expiratory lung volume during mechanical ventilation: a comparison with reference values and the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure in intensive care unit patients with different lung conditions
title_full_unstemmed End-expiratory lung volume during mechanical ventilation: a comparison with reference values and the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure in intensive care unit patients with different lung conditions
title_short End-expiratory lung volume during mechanical ventilation: a comparison with reference values and the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure in intensive care unit patients with different lung conditions
title_sort end-expiratory lung volume during mechanical ventilation: a comparison with reference values and the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure in intensive care unit patients with different lung conditions
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2646307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19021898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc7125
work_keys_str_mv AT bikkeridog endexpiratorylungvolumeduringmechanicalventilationacomparisonwithreferencevaluesandtheeffectofpositiveendexpiratorypressureinintensivecareunitpatientswithdifferentlungconditions
AT vanbommeljasper endexpiratorylungvolumeduringmechanicalventilationacomparisonwithreferencevaluesandtheeffectofpositiveendexpiratorypressureinintensivecareunitpatientswithdifferentlungconditions
AT mirandadinisreis endexpiratorylungvolumeduringmechanicalventilationacomparisonwithreferencevaluesandtheeffectofpositiveendexpiratorypressureinintensivecareunitpatientswithdifferentlungconditions
AT bakkerjan endexpiratorylungvolumeduringmechanicalventilationacomparisonwithreferencevaluesandtheeffectofpositiveendexpiratorypressureinintensivecareunitpatientswithdifferentlungconditions
AT gommersdiederik endexpiratorylungvolumeduringmechanicalventilationacomparisonwithreferencevaluesandtheeffectofpositiveendexpiratorypressureinintensivecareunitpatientswithdifferentlungconditions