Cargando…

A prospective trial of elective extubation in brain injured patients meeting extubation criteria for ventilatory support: a feasibility study

INTRODUCTION: To assess the safety and feasibility of recruiting mechanically ventilated patients with brain injury who are solely intubated for airway protection and randomising them into early or delayed extubation, and to obtain estimates to refine sample-size calculations for a larger study. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manno, Edward M, Rabinstein, Alejandro A, Wijdicks, Eelco FM, Brown, Allen W, Freeman, William D, Lee, Vivien H, Weigand, Stephen D, Keegan, Mark T, Brown, Daniel R, Whalen, Francis X, Roy, Tuhin K, Hubmayr, Rolf D
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2646349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19000302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc7112
_version_ 1782164852904558592
author Manno, Edward M
Rabinstein, Alejandro A
Wijdicks, Eelco FM
Brown, Allen W
Freeman, William D
Lee, Vivien H
Weigand, Stephen D
Keegan, Mark T
Brown, Daniel R
Whalen, Francis X
Roy, Tuhin K
Hubmayr, Rolf D
author_facet Manno, Edward M
Rabinstein, Alejandro A
Wijdicks, Eelco FM
Brown, Allen W
Freeman, William D
Lee, Vivien H
Weigand, Stephen D
Keegan, Mark T
Brown, Daniel R
Whalen, Francis X
Roy, Tuhin K
Hubmayr, Rolf D
author_sort Manno, Edward M
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: To assess the safety and feasibility of recruiting mechanically ventilated patients with brain injury who are solely intubated for airway protection and randomising them into early or delayed extubation, and to obtain estimates to refine sample-size calculations for a larger study. The design is a single-blinded block randomised controlled trial. A single large academic medical centre is the setting. METHODS: Sixteen neurologically stable but severely brain injured patients with a Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) of 8 or less were randomised to early or delayed extubation until their neurological examination improved. Eligible patients met standard respiratory criteria for extubation and passed a modified Airway Care Score (ACS) to ensure adequate control of respiratory secretions. The primary outcome measured between groups was the functional status of the patient at hospital discharge as measured by a Modified Rankin Score (MRS) and Functional Independence Measure (FIM). Secondary measurements included the number of nosocomial pneumonias and re-intubations, and intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay. Standard statistical assessments were employed for analysis. RESULTS: Five female and eleven male patients ranging in age from 30 to 93 years were enrolled. Aetiologies responsible for the neurological injury included six head traumas, three brain tumours, two intracerebral haemorrhages, two subarachnoid haemorrhages and three ischaemic strokes. There were no demographic differences between the groups. There were no unexpected deaths and no significant differences in secondary measures. The difference in means between the MRS and FIM were small (0.25 and 5.62, respectively). These results suggest that between 64 and 110 patients are needed in each treatment arm to detect a treatment effect with 80% power. CONCLUSIONS: Recruitment and randomisation of severely brain injured patients appears to be safe and feasible. A large multicentre trial will be needed to determine if stable, severely brain injured patients who meet respiratory and airway control criteria for extubation need to remain intubated.
format Text
id pubmed-2646349
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26463492009-02-24 A prospective trial of elective extubation in brain injured patients meeting extubation criteria for ventilatory support: a feasibility study Manno, Edward M Rabinstein, Alejandro A Wijdicks, Eelco FM Brown, Allen W Freeman, William D Lee, Vivien H Weigand, Stephen D Keegan, Mark T Brown, Daniel R Whalen, Francis X Roy, Tuhin K Hubmayr, Rolf D Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: To assess the safety and feasibility of recruiting mechanically ventilated patients with brain injury who are solely intubated for airway protection and randomising them into early or delayed extubation, and to obtain estimates to refine sample-size calculations for a larger study. The design is a single-blinded block randomised controlled trial. A single large academic medical centre is the setting. METHODS: Sixteen neurologically stable but severely brain injured patients with a Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) of 8 or less were randomised to early or delayed extubation until their neurological examination improved. Eligible patients met standard respiratory criteria for extubation and passed a modified Airway Care Score (ACS) to ensure adequate control of respiratory secretions. The primary outcome measured between groups was the functional status of the patient at hospital discharge as measured by a Modified Rankin Score (MRS) and Functional Independence Measure (FIM). Secondary measurements included the number of nosocomial pneumonias and re-intubations, and intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay. Standard statistical assessments were employed for analysis. RESULTS: Five female and eleven male patients ranging in age from 30 to 93 years were enrolled. Aetiologies responsible for the neurological injury included six head traumas, three brain tumours, two intracerebral haemorrhages, two subarachnoid haemorrhages and three ischaemic strokes. There were no demographic differences between the groups. There were no unexpected deaths and no significant differences in secondary measures. The difference in means between the MRS and FIM were small (0.25 and 5.62, respectively). These results suggest that between 64 and 110 patients are needed in each treatment arm to detect a treatment effect with 80% power. CONCLUSIONS: Recruitment and randomisation of severely brain injured patients appears to be safe and feasible. A large multicentre trial will be needed to determine if stable, severely brain injured patients who meet respiratory and airway control criteria for extubation need to remain intubated. BioMed Central 2008 2008-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2646349/ /pubmed/19000302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc7112 Text en Copyright © 2008 Manno et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Manno, Edward M
Rabinstein, Alejandro A
Wijdicks, Eelco FM
Brown, Allen W
Freeman, William D
Lee, Vivien H
Weigand, Stephen D
Keegan, Mark T
Brown, Daniel R
Whalen, Francis X
Roy, Tuhin K
Hubmayr, Rolf D
A prospective trial of elective extubation in brain injured patients meeting extubation criteria for ventilatory support: a feasibility study
title A prospective trial of elective extubation in brain injured patients meeting extubation criteria for ventilatory support: a feasibility study
title_full A prospective trial of elective extubation in brain injured patients meeting extubation criteria for ventilatory support: a feasibility study
title_fullStr A prospective trial of elective extubation in brain injured patients meeting extubation criteria for ventilatory support: a feasibility study
title_full_unstemmed A prospective trial of elective extubation in brain injured patients meeting extubation criteria for ventilatory support: a feasibility study
title_short A prospective trial of elective extubation in brain injured patients meeting extubation criteria for ventilatory support: a feasibility study
title_sort prospective trial of elective extubation in brain injured patients meeting extubation criteria for ventilatory support: a feasibility study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2646349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19000302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc7112
work_keys_str_mv AT mannoedwardm aprospectivetrialofelectiveextubationinbraininjuredpatientsmeetingextubationcriteriaforventilatorysupportafeasibilitystudy
AT rabinsteinalejandroa aprospectivetrialofelectiveextubationinbraininjuredpatientsmeetingextubationcriteriaforventilatorysupportafeasibilitystudy
AT wijdickseelcofm aprospectivetrialofelectiveextubationinbraininjuredpatientsmeetingextubationcriteriaforventilatorysupportafeasibilitystudy
AT brownallenw aprospectivetrialofelectiveextubationinbraininjuredpatientsmeetingextubationcriteriaforventilatorysupportafeasibilitystudy
AT freemanwilliamd aprospectivetrialofelectiveextubationinbraininjuredpatientsmeetingextubationcriteriaforventilatorysupportafeasibilitystudy
AT leevivienh aprospectivetrialofelectiveextubationinbraininjuredpatientsmeetingextubationcriteriaforventilatorysupportafeasibilitystudy
AT weigandstephend aprospectivetrialofelectiveextubationinbraininjuredpatientsmeetingextubationcriteriaforventilatorysupportafeasibilitystudy
AT keeganmarkt aprospectivetrialofelectiveextubationinbraininjuredpatientsmeetingextubationcriteriaforventilatorysupportafeasibilitystudy
AT browndanielr aprospectivetrialofelectiveextubationinbraininjuredpatientsmeetingextubationcriteriaforventilatorysupportafeasibilitystudy
AT whalenfrancisx aprospectivetrialofelectiveextubationinbraininjuredpatientsmeetingextubationcriteriaforventilatorysupportafeasibilitystudy
AT roytuhink aprospectivetrialofelectiveextubationinbraininjuredpatientsmeetingextubationcriteriaforventilatorysupportafeasibilitystudy
AT hubmayrrolfd aprospectivetrialofelectiveextubationinbraininjuredpatientsmeetingextubationcriteriaforventilatorysupportafeasibilitystudy
AT mannoedwardm prospectivetrialofelectiveextubationinbraininjuredpatientsmeetingextubationcriteriaforventilatorysupportafeasibilitystudy
AT rabinsteinalejandroa prospectivetrialofelectiveextubationinbraininjuredpatientsmeetingextubationcriteriaforventilatorysupportafeasibilitystudy
AT wijdickseelcofm prospectivetrialofelectiveextubationinbraininjuredpatientsmeetingextubationcriteriaforventilatorysupportafeasibilitystudy
AT brownallenw prospectivetrialofelectiveextubationinbraininjuredpatientsmeetingextubationcriteriaforventilatorysupportafeasibilitystudy
AT freemanwilliamd prospectivetrialofelectiveextubationinbraininjuredpatientsmeetingextubationcriteriaforventilatorysupportafeasibilitystudy
AT leevivienh prospectivetrialofelectiveextubationinbraininjuredpatientsmeetingextubationcriteriaforventilatorysupportafeasibilitystudy
AT weigandstephend prospectivetrialofelectiveextubationinbraininjuredpatientsmeetingextubationcriteriaforventilatorysupportafeasibilitystudy
AT keeganmarkt prospectivetrialofelectiveextubationinbraininjuredpatientsmeetingextubationcriteriaforventilatorysupportafeasibilitystudy
AT browndanielr prospectivetrialofelectiveextubationinbraininjuredpatientsmeetingextubationcriteriaforventilatorysupportafeasibilitystudy
AT whalenfrancisx prospectivetrialofelectiveextubationinbraininjuredpatientsmeetingextubationcriteriaforventilatorysupportafeasibilitystudy
AT roytuhink prospectivetrialofelectiveextubationinbraininjuredpatientsmeetingextubationcriteriaforventilatorysupportafeasibilitystudy
AT hubmayrrolfd prospectivetrialofelectiveextubationinbraininjuredpatientsmeetingextubationcriteriaforventilatorysupportafeasibilitystudy