Cargando…
A prospective trial of elective extubation in brain injured patients meeting extubation criteria for ventilatory support: a feasibility study
INTRODUCTION: To assess the safety and feasibility of recruiting mechanically ventilated patients with brain injury who are solely intubated for airway protection and randomising them into early or delayed extubation, and to obtain estimates to refine sample-size calculations for a larger study. The...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2646349/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19000302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc7112 |
_version_ | 1782164852904558592 |
---|---|
author | Manno, Edward M Rabinstein, Alejandro A Wijdicks, Eelco FM Brown, Allen W Freeman, William D Lee, Vivien H Weigand, Stephen D Keegan, Mark T Brown, Daniel R Whalen, Francis X Roy, Tuhin K Hubmayr, Rolf D |
author_facet | Manno, Edward M Rabinstein, Alejandro A Wijdicks, Eelco FM Brown, Allen W Freeman, William D Lee, Vivien H Weigand, Stephen D Keegan, Mark T Brown, Daniel R Whalen, Francis X Roy, Tuhin K Hubmayr, Rolf D |
author_sort | Manno, Edward M |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: To assess the safety and feasibility of recruiting mechanically ventilated patients with brain injury who are solely intubated for airway protection and randomising them into early or delayed extubation, and to obtain estimates to refine sample-size calculations for a larger study. The design is a single-blinded block randomised controlled trial. A single large academic medical centre is the setting. METHODS: Sixteen neurologically stable but severely brain injured patients with a Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) of 8 or less were randomised to early or delayed extubation until their neurological examination improved. Eligible patients met standard respiratory criteria for extubation and passed a modified Airway Care Score (ACS) to ensure adequate control of respiratory secretions. The primary outcome measured between groups was the functional status of the patient at hospital discharge as measured by a Modified Rankin Score (MRS) and Functional Independence Measure (FIM). Secondary measurements included the number of nosocomial pneumonias and re-intubations, and intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay. Standard statistical assessments were employed for analysis. RESULTS: Five female and eleven male patients ranging in age from 30 to 93 years were enrolled. Aetiologies responsible for the neurological injury included six head traumas, three brain tumours, two intracerebral haemorrhages, two subarachnoid haemorrhages and three ischaemic strokes. There were no demographic differences between the groups. There were no unexpected deaths and no significant differences in secondary measures. The difference in means between the MRS and FIM were small (0.25 and 5.62, respectively). These results suggest that between 64 and 110 patients are needed in each treatment arm to detect a treatment effect with 80% power. CONCLUSIONS: Recruitment and randomisation of severely brain injured patients appears to be safe and feasible. A large multicentre trial will be needed to determine if stable, severely brain injured patients who meet respiratory and airway control criteria for extubation need to remain intubated. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2646349 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26463492009-02-24 A prospective trial of elective extubation in brain injured patients meeting extubation criteria for ventilatory support: a feasibility study Manno, Edward M Rabinstein, Alejandro A Wijdicks, Eelco FM Brown, Allen W Freeman, William D Lee, Vivien H Weigand, Stephen D Keegan, Mark T Brown, Daniel R Whalen, Francis X Roy, Tuhin K Hubmayr, Rolf D Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: To assess the safety and feasibility of recruiting mechanically ventilated patients with brain injury who are solely intubated for airway protection and randomising them into early or delayed extubation, and to obtain estimates to refine sample-size calculations for a larger study. The design is a single-blinded block randomised controlled trial. A single large academic medical centre is the setting. METHODS: Sixteen neurologically stable but severely brain injured patients with a Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) of 8 or less were randomised to early or delayed extubation until their neurological examination improved. Eligible patients met standard respiratory criteria for extubation and passed a modified Airway Care Score (ACS) to ensure adequate control of respiratory secretions. The primary outcome measured between groups was the functional status of the patient at hospital discharge as measured by a Modified Rankin Score (MRS) and Functional Independence Measure (FIM). Secondary measurements included the number of nosocomial pneumonias and re-intubations, and intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay. Standard statistical assessments were employed for analysis. RESULTS: Five female and eleven male patients ranging in age from 30 to 93 years were enrolled. Aetiologies responsible for the neurological injury included six head traumas, three brain tumours, two intracerebral haemorrhages, two subarachnoid haemorrhages and three ischaemic strokes. There were no demographic differences between the groups. There were no unexpected deaths and no significant differences in secondary measures. The difference in means between the MRS and FIM were small (0.25 and 5.62, respectively). These results suggest that between 64 and 110 patients are needed in each treatment arm to detect a treatment effect with 80% power. CONCLUSIONS: Recruitment and randomisation of severely brain injured patients appears to be safe and feasible. A large multicentre trial will be needed to determine if stable, severely brain injured patients who meet respiratory and airway control criteria for extubation need to remain intubated. BioMed Central 2008 2008-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2646349/ /pubmed/19000302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc7112 Text en Copyright © 2008 Manno et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Manno, Edward M Rabinstein, Alejandro A Wijdicks, Eelco FM Brown, Allen W Freeman, William D Lee, Vivien H Weigand, Stephen D Keegan, Mark T Brown, Daniel R Whalen, Francis X Roy, Tuhin K Hubmayr, Rolf D A prospective trial of elective extubation in brain injured patients meeting extubation criteria for ventilatory support: a feasibility study |
title | A prospective trial of elective extubation in brain injured patients meeting extubation criteria for ventilatory support: a feasibility study |
title_full | A prospective trial of elective extubation in brain injured patients meeting extubation criteria for ventilatory support: a feasibility study |
title_fullStr | A prospective trial of elective extubation in brain injured patients meeting extubation criteria for ventilatory support: a feasibility study |
title_full_unstemmed | A prospective trial of elective extubation in brain injured patients meeting extubation criteria for ventilatory support: a feasibility study |
title_short | A prospective trial of elective extubation in brain injured patients meeting extubation criteria for ventilatory support: a feasibility study |
title_sort | prospective trial of elective extubation in brain injured patients meeting extubation criteria for ventilatory support: a feasibility study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2646349/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19000302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc7112 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mannoedwardm aprospectivetrialofelectiveextubationinbraininjuredpatientsmeetingextubationcriteriaforventilatorysupportafeasibilitystudy AT rabinsteinalejandroa aprospectivetrialofelectiveextubationinbraininjuredpatientsmeetingextubationcriteriaforventilatorysupportafeasibilitystudy AT wijdickseelcofm aprospectivetrialofelectiveextubationinbraininjuredpatientsmeetingextubationcriteriaforventilatorysupportafeasibilitystudy AT brownallenw aprospectivetrialofelectiveextubationinbraininjuredpatientsmeetingextubationcriteriaforventilatorysupportafeasibilitystudy AT freemanwilliamd aprospectivetrialofelectiveextubationinbraininjuredpatientsmeetingextubationcriteriaforventilatorysupportafeasibilitystudy AT leevivienh aprospectivetrialofelectiveextubationinbraininjuredpatientsmeetingextubationcriteriaforventilatorysupportafeasibilitystudy AT weigandstephend aprospectivetrialofelectiveextubationinbraininjuredpatientsmeetingextubationcriteriaforventilatorysupportafeasibilitystudy AT keeganmarkt aprospectivetrialofelectiveextubationinbraininjuredpatientsmeetingextubationcriteriaforventilatorysupportafeasibilitystudy AT browndanielr aprospectivetrialofelectiveextubationinbraininjuredpatientsmeetingextubationcriteriaforventilatorysupportafeasibilitystudy AT whalenfrancisx aprospectivetrialofelectiveextubationinbraininjuredpatientsmeetingextubationcriteriaforventilatorysupportafeasibilitystudy AT roytuhink aprospectivetrialofelectiveextubationinbraininjuredpatientsmeetingextubationcriteriaforventilatorysupportafeasibilitystudy AT hubmayrrolfd aprospectivetrialofelectiveextubationinbraininjuredpatientsmeetingextubationcriteriaforventilatorysupportafeasibilitystudy AT mannoedwardm prospectivetrialofelectiveextubationinbraininjuredpatientsmeetingextubationcriteriaforventilatorysupportafeasibilitystudy AT rabinsteinalejandroa prospectivetrialofelectiveextubationinbraininjuredpatientsmeetingextubationcriteriaforventilatorysupportafeasibilitystudy AT wijdickseelcofm prospectivetrialofelectiveextubationinbraininjuredpatientsmeetingextubationcriteriaforventilatorysupportafeasibilitystudy AT brownallenw prospectivetrialofelectiveextubationinbraininjuredpatientsmeetingextubationcriteriaforventilatorysupportafeasibilitystudy AT freemanwilliamd prospectivetrialofelectiveextubationinbraininjuredpatientsmeetingextubationcriteriaforventilatorysupportafeasibilitystudy AT leevivienh prospectivetrialofelectiveextubationinbraininjuredpatientsmeetingextubationcriteriaforventilatorysupportafeasibilitystudy AT weigandstephend prospectivetrialofelectiveextubationinbraininjuredpatientsmeetingextubationcriteriaforventilatorysupportafeasibilitystudy AT keeganmarkt prospectivetrialofelectiveextubationinbraininjuredpatientsmeetingextubationcriteriaforventilatorysupportafeasibilitystudy AT browndanielr prospectivetrialofelectiveextubationinbraininjuredpatientsmeetingextubationcriteriaforventilatorysupportafeasibilitystudy AT whalenfrancisx prospectivetrialofelectiveextubationinbraininjuredpatientsmeetingextubationcriteriaforventilatorysupportafeasibilitystudy AT roytuhink prospectivetrialofelectiveextubationinbraininjuredpatientsmeetingextubationcriteriaforventilatorysupportafeasibilitystudy AT hubmayrrolfd prospectivetrialofelectiveextubationinbraininjuredpatientsmeetingextubationcriteriaforventilatorysupportafeasibilitystudy |