Cargando…

Congenital anomalies in multiple births after early loss of a conceptus

BACKGROUND: Congenital anomalies are more common in twins than singletons but in the majority, aetiology is not known. Our aim was to test the hypothesis that survivors of an early loss in a multiple conception, compared with all singletons, are at increased risk of congenital anomaly. METHODS: Data...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pharoah, P.O.D., Glinianaia, S.V., Rankin, J.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2646789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19059945
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/den436
_version_ 1782164895361400832
author Pharoah, P.O.D.
Glinianaia, S.V.
Rankin, J.
author_facet Pharoah, P.O.D.
Glinianaia, S.V.
Rankin, J.
author_sort Pharoah, P.O.D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Congenital anomalies are more common in twins than singletons but in the majority, aetiology is not known. Our aim was to test the hypothesis that survivors of an early loss in a multiple conception, compared with all singletons, are at increased risk of congenital anomaly. METHODS: Data were abstracted from the UK population-based Northern Multiple Pregnancy Register and Northern Congenital Abnormality Survey, 1998–2004. RESULTS: Among 3311 twin conceptions, both conceptuses were lost at <16 weeks gestation in 67, and one conceptus in 142 conceptions. Of the 142 singleton survivors, two died in infancy, two were terminated for a congenital anomaly and 11 of 138 had a congenital anomaly (prevalence 915.5 per 10 000 births). There were 197 congenital anomalies among 5948 registered twin births (331.2 per 10 000). The relative risk (RR) of congenital anomalies in a singleton with early loss of a conceptus and twins was 2.40 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.34–4.29]. There were 4265 infants with a congenital anomaly among the 206 914 singletons [206.1 per 10 000 births: RR twin:singleton 1.61 (95% CI 1.40–1.89)]. CONCLUSIONS: A highly significant increase in the risk of congenital anomaly in survivors from a multiple conception following early loss of a conceptus supports the hypothesis that many congenital anomalies are associated with monozygotic multiple conceptions.
format Text
id pubmed-2646789
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26467892009-04-01 Congenital anomalies in multiple births after early loss of a conceptus Pharoah, P.O.D. Glinianaia, S.V. Rankin, J. Hum Reprod Original Articles BACKGROUND: Congenital anomalies are more common in twins than singletons but in the majority, aetiology is not known. Our aim was to test the hypothesis that survivors of an early loss in a multiple conception, compared with all singletons, are at increased risk of congenital anomaly. METHODS: Data were abstracted from the UK population-based Northern Multiple Pregnancy Register and Northern Congenital Abnormality Survey, 1998–2004. RESULTS: Among 3311 twin conceptions, both conceptuses were lost at <16 weeks gestation in 67, and one conceptus in 142 conceptions. Of the 142 singleton survivors, two died in infancy, two were terminated for a congenital anomaly and 11 of 138 had a congenital anomaly (prevalence 915.5 per 10 000 births). There were 197 congenital anomalies among 5948 registered twin births (331.2 per 10 000). The relative risk (RR) of congenital anomalies in a singleton with early loss of a conceptus and twins was 2.40 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.34–4.29]. There were 4265 infants with a congenital anomaly among the 206 914 singletons [206.1 per 10 000 births: RR twin:singleton 1.61 (95% CI 1.40–1.89)]. CONCLUSIONS: A highly significant increase in the risk of congenital anomaly in survivors from a multiple conception following early loss of a conceptus supports the hypothesis that many congenital anomalies are associated with monozygotic multiple conceptions. Oxford University Press 2009-03 2008-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC2646789/ /pubmed/19059945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/den436 Text en © The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
spellingShingle Original Articles
Pharoah, P.O.D.
Glinianaia, S.V.
Rankin, J.
Congenital anomalies in multiple births after early loss of a conceptus
title Congenital anomalies in multiple births after early loss of a conceptus
title_full Congenital anomalies in multiple births after early loss of a conceptus
title_fullStr Congenital anomalies in multiple births after early loss of a conceptus
title_full_unstemmed Congenital anomalies in multiple births after early loss of a conceptus
title_short Congenital anomalies in multiple births after early loss of a conceptus
title_sort congenital anomalies in multiple births after early loss of a conceptus
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2646789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19059945
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/den436
work_keys_str_mv AT pharoahpod congenitalanomaliesinmultiplebirthsafterearlylossofaconceptus
AT glinianaiasv congenitalanomaliesinmultiplebirthsafterearlylossofaconceptus
AT rankinj congenitalanomaliesinmultiplebirthsafterearlylossofaconceptus