Cargando…

Cytotoxicity of Dental Adhesives In Vitro

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cytotoxic effect of six dental adhesives (Admira Bond, Clearfil Liner Bond 2V, ED Primer II, Fuji Bond LC, Gluma Comfort Bond, and NanoBond) applied to cell cultures. METHODS: The experiments were performed on two cell lines, rat pulp cells (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koulaouzidou, Elisabeth A., Helvatjoglu-Antoniades, Maria, Palaghias, George, Karanika-Kouma, Artemis, Antoniades, Dimitrios
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dental Investigations Society 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2647953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19262725
_version_ 1782164956363358208
author Koulaouzidou, Elisabeth A.
Helvatjoglu-Antoniades, Maria
Palaghias, George
Karanika-Kouma, Artemis
Antoniades, Dimitrios
author_facet Koulaouzidou, Elisabeth A.
Helvatjoglu-Antoniades, Maria
Palaghias, George
Karanika-Kouma, Artemis
Antoniades, Dimitrios
author_sort Koulaouzidou, Elisabeth A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cytotoxic effect of six dental adhesives (Admira Bond, Clearfil Liner Bond 2V, ED Primer II, Fuji Bond LC, Gluma Comfort Bond, and NanoBond) applied to cell cultures. METHODS: The experiments were performed on two cell lines, rat pulp cells (RPC-C2A) and human lung fibroblasts (MRC5). Samples of the adhesives were light-cured and placed in culture medium for 24 hours. The extraction media was applied on the RPC-C2A and the MRC5 cells. Complete medium was used as a control. Cytotoxicity was evaluated with a modified sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay after 24 hours of exposure. RESULTS: The cell survival of RPC-C2A cells exposed to Fuji Bond LC, NanoBond, Clearfil Liner Bond 2V, ED Primer II, Admira Bond and Gluma Comfort Bond was 73%, 67%, 50%, 20%, 18% and 5% respectively, relative to the cell survival with the control medium. In the MRC5 cell line, the relative survival was 98%, 80%, 72%, 41%, 19% and 7% after exposure to NanoBond, Fuji Bond LC, Clearfil Liner Bond 2V, ED Primer II, Admira Bond and Gluma Comfort Bond, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Different types of dental adhesives showed different cytotoxic effects on cells in vitro. The self-etch adhesives were superior in terms of cytotoxicity. The different cytotoxic effects of dental adhesives should be considered when selecting an appropriate adhesive for operative restorations.
format Text
id pubmed-2647953
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Dental Investigations Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26479532009-03-04 Cytotoxicity of Dental Adhesives In Vitro Koulaouzidou, Elisabeth A. Helvatjoglu-Antoniades, Maria Palaghias, George Karanika-Kouma, Artemis Antoniades, Dimitrios Eur J Dent Original Article OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cytotoxic effect of six dental adhesives (Admira Bond, Clearfil Liner Bond 2V, ED Primer II, Fuji Bond LC, Gluma Comfort Bond, and NanoBond) applied to cell cultures. METHODS: The experiments were performed on two cell lines, rat pulp cells (RPC-C2A) and human lung fibroblasts (MRC5). Samples of the adhesives were light-cured and placed in culture medium for 24 hours. The extraction media was applied on the RPC-C2A and the MRC5 cells. Complete medium was used as a control. Cytotoxicity was evaluated with a modified sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay after 24 hours of exposure. RESULTS: The cell survival of RPC-C2A cells exposed to Fuji Bond LC, NanoBond, Clearfil Liner Bond 2V, ED Primer II, Admira Bond and Gluma Comfort Bond was 73%, 67%, 50%, 20%, 18% and 5% respectively, relative to the cell survival with the control medium. In the MRC5 cell line, the relative survival was 98%, 80%, 72%, 41%, 19% and 7% after exposure to NanoBond, Fuji Bond LC, Clearfil Liner Bond 2V, ED Primer II, Admira Bond and Gluma Comfort Bond, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Different types of dental adhesives showed different cytotoxic effects on cells in vitro. The self-etch adhesives were superior in terms of cytotoxicity. The different cytotoxic effects of dental adhesives should be considered when selecting an appropriate adhesive for operative restorations. Dental Investigations Society 2009-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2647953/ /pubmed/19262725 Text en Copyright 2009 European Journal of Dentistry. All rights reserved.
spellingShingle Original Article
Koulaouzidou, Elisabeth A.
Helvatjoglu-Antoniades, Maria
Palaghias, George
Karanika-Kouma, Artemis
Antoniades, Dimitrios
Cytotoxicity of Dental Adhesives In Vitro
title Cytotoxicity of Dental Adhesives In Vitro
title_full Cytotoxicity of Dental Adhesives In Vitro
title_fullStr Cytotoxicity of Dental Adhesives In Vitro
title_full_unstemmed Cytotoxicity of Dental Adhesives In Vitro
title_short Cytotoxicity of Dental Adhesives In Vitro
title_sort cytotoxicity of dental adhesives in vitro
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2647953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19262725
work_keys_str_mv AT koulaouzidouelisabetha cytotoxicityofdentaladhesivesinvitro
AT helvatjogluantoniadesmaria cytotoxicityofdentaladhesivesinvitro
AT palaghiasgeorge cytotoxicityofdentaladhesivesinvitro
AT karanikakoumaartemis cytotoxicityofdentaladhesivesinvitro
AT antoniadesdimitrios cytotoxicityofdentaladhesivesinvitro