Cargando…
Undue reliance on I(2 )in assessing heterogeneity may mislead
BACKGROUND: The heterogeneity statistic I(2), interpreted as the percentage of variability due to heterogeneity between studies rather than sampling error, depends on precision, that is, the size of the studies included. METHODS: Based on a real meta-analysis, we simulate artificially 'inflatin...
Autores principales: | Rücker, Gerta, Schwarzer, Guido, Carpenter, James R, Schumacher, Martin |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2648991/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19036172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-79 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Seriously misleading results using inverse of Freeman‐Tukey double arcsine transformation in meta‐analysis of single proportions
por: Schwarzer, Guido, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Meta-analysis with R
por: Schwarzer, Guido, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Ranking treatments in frequentist network meta-analysis works without resampling methods
por: Rücker, Gerta, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Presenting simulation results in a nested loop plot
por: Rücker, Gerta, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Network meta‐analysis of multicomponent interventions
por: Rücker, Gerta, et al.
Publicado: (2019)