Cargando…

The Leeds Evaluation of Efficacy of Detoxification Study (LEEDS) prisons project: a randomised controlled trial comparing dihydrocodeine and buprenorphine for opiate detoxification

BACKGROUND: Many opiate users entering British prisons require prescribed medication to help them achieve abstinence. This commonly takes the form of a detoxification regime. Previously, a range of detoxification agents have been prescribed without a clear evidence base to recommend a drug of choice...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sheard, Laura, Wright, Nat MJ, El-Sayeh, Hany G, Adams, Clive E, Li, Ryan, Tompkins, Charlotte NE
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2649065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19196468
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-597X-4-1
_version_ 1782165019201372160
author Sheard, Laura
Wright, Nat MJ
El-Sayeh, Hany G
Adams, Clive E
Li, Ryan
Tompkins, Charlotte NE
author_facet Sheard, Laura
Wright, Nat MJ
El-Sayeh, Hany G
Adams, Clive E
Li, Ryan
Tompkins, Charlotte NE
author_sort Sheard, Laura
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many opiate users entering British prisons require prescribed medication to help them achieve abstinence. This commonly takes the form of a detoxification regime. Previously, a range of detoxification agents have been prescribed without a clear evidence base to recommend a drug of choice. There are few trials and very few in the prison setting. This study compares dihydrocodeine with buprenorphine. METHODS: Open label, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial in a large remand prison in the North of England. Ninety adult male prisoners requesting an opiate detoxification were randomised to receive either daily sublingual buprenorphine or daily oral dihydrocodeine, given in the context of routine care. All participants gave written, informed consent. Reducing regimens were within a standard regimen of not more than 20 days and were at the discretion of the prescribing doctor. Primary outcome was abstinence from illicit opiates as indicated by a urine test at five days post detoxification. Secondary outcomes were collected during the detoxification period and then at one, three and six months post detoxification. Analysis was undertaken using relative risk tests for categorical data and unpaired t-tests for continuous data. RESULTS: 64% of those approached took part in the study. 63 men (70%) gave a urine sample at five days post detoxification. At the completion of detoxification, by intention to treat analysis, a higher proportion of people allocated to buprenorphine provided a urine sample negative for opiates (abstinent) compared with those who received dihydrocodeine (57% vs 35%, RR 1.61 CI 1.02–2.56). At the 1, 3 and 6 month follow-up points, there were no significant differences for urine samples negative for opiates between the two groups. Follow up rates were low for those participants who had subsequently been released into the community. CONCLUSION: These findings would suggest that dihydrocodeine should not be routinely used for detoxification from opiates in the prison setting. The high relapse rate amongst those achieving abstinence would suggest the need for an increased emphasis upon opiate maintenance programmes in the prison setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN07752728
format Text
id pubmed-2649065
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26490652009-02-28 The Leeds Evaluation of Efficacy of Detoxification Study (LEEDS) prisons project: a randomised controlled trial comparing dihydrocodeine and buprenorphine for opiate detoxification Sheard, Laura Wright, Nat MJ El-Sayeh, Hany G Adams, Clive E Li, Ryan Tompkins, Charlotte NE Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy Research BACKGROUND: Many opiate users entering British prisons require prescribed medication to help them achieve abstinence. This commonly takes the form of a detoxification regime. Previously, a range of detoxification agents have been prescribed without a clear evidence base to recommend a drug of choice. There are few trials and very few in the prison setting. This study compares dihydrocodeine with buprenorphine. METHODS: Open label, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial in a large remand prison in the North of England. Ninety adult male prisoners requesting an opiate detoxification were randomised to receive either daily sublingual buprenorphine or daily oral dihydrocodeine, given in the context of routine care. All participants gave written, informed consent. Reducing regimens were within a standard regimen of not more than 20 days and were at the discretion of the prescribing doctor. Primary outcome was abstinence from illicit opiates as indicated by a urine test at five days post detoxification. Secondary outcomes were collected during the detoxification period and then at one, three and six months post detoxification. Analysis was undertaken using relative risk tests for categorical data and unpaired t-tests for continuous data. RESULTS: 64% of those approached took part in the study. 63 men (70%) gave a urine sample at five days post detoxification. At the completion of detoxification, by intention to treat analysis, a higher proportion of people allocated to buprenorphine provided a urine sample negative for opiates (abstinent) compared with those who received dihydrocodeine (57% vs 35%, RR 1.61 CI 1.02–2.56). At the 1, 3 and 6 month follow-up points, there were no significant differences for urine samples negative for opiates between the two groups. Follow up rates were low for those participants who had subsequently been released into the community. CONCLUSION: These findings would suggest that dihydrocodeine should not be routinely used for detoxification from opiates in the prison setting. The high relapse rate amongst those achieving abstinence would suggest the need for an increased emphasis upon opiate maintenance programmes in the prison setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN07752728 BioMed Central 2009-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC2649065/ /pubmed/19196468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-597X-4-1 Text en Copyright © 2009 Sheard et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Sheard, Laura
Wright, Nat MJ
El-Sayeh, Hany G
Adams, Clive E
Li, Ryan
Tompkins, Charlotte NE
The Leeds Evaluation of Efficacy of Detoxification Study (LEEDS) prisons project: a randomised controlled trial comparing dihydrocodeine and buprenorphine for opiate detoxification
title The Leeds Evaluation of Efficacy of Detoxification Study (LEEDS) prisons project: a randomised controlled trial comparing dihydrocodeine and buprenorphine for opiate detoxification
title_full The Leeds Evaluation of Efficacy of Detoxification Study (LEEDS) prisons project: a randomised controlled trial comparing dihydrocodeine and buprenorphine for opiate detoxification
title_fullStr The Leeds Evaluation of Efficacy of Detoxification Study (LEEDS) prisons project: a randomised controlled trial comparing dihydrocodeine and buprenorphine for opiate detoxification
title_full_unstemmed The Leeds Evaluation of Efficacy of Detoxification Study (LEEDS) prisons project: a randomised controlled trial comparing dihydrocodeine and buprenorphine for opiate detoxification
title_short The Leeds Evaluation of Efficacy of Detoxification Study (LEEDS) prisons project: a randomised controlled trial comparing dihydrocodeine and buprenorphine for opiate detoxification
title_sort leeds evaluation of efficacy of detoxification study (leeds) prisons project: a randomised controlled trial comparing dihydrocodeine and buprenorphine for opiate detoxification
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2649065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19196468
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-597X-4-1
work_keys_str_mv AT sheardlaura theleedsevaluationofefficacyofdetoxificationstudyleedsprisonsprojectarandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingdihydrocodeineandbuprenorphineforopiatedetoxification
AT wrightnatmj theleedsevaluationofefficacyofdetoxificationstudyleedsprisonsprojectarandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingdihydrocodeineandbuprenorphineforopiatedetoxification
AT elsayehhanyg theleedsevaluationofefficacyofdetoxificationstudyleedsprisonsprojectarandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingdihydrocodeineandbuprenorphineforopiatedetoxification
AT adamsclivee theleedsevaluationofefficacyofdetoxificationstudyleedsprisonsprojectarandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingdihydrocodeineandbuprenorphineforopiatedetoxification
AT liryan theleedsevaluationofefficacyofdetoxificationstudyleedsprisonsprojectarandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingdihydrocodeineandbuprenorphineforopiatedetoxification
AT tompkinscharlottene theleedsevaluationofefficacyofdetoxificationstudyleedsprisonsprojectarandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingdihydrocodeineandbuprenorphineforopiatedetoxification
AT sheardlaura leedsevaluationofefficacyofdetoxificationstudyleedsprisonsprojectarandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingdihydrocodeineandbuprenorphineforopiatedetoxification
AT wrightnatmj leedsevaluationofefficacyofdetoxificationstudyleedsprisonsprojectarandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingdihydrocodeineandbuprenorphineforopiatedetoxification
AT elsayehhanyg leedsevaluationofefficacyofdetoxificationstudyleedsprisonsprojectarandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingdihydrocodeineandbuprenorphineforopiatedetoxification
AT adamsclivee leedsevaluationofefficacyofdetoxificationstudyleedsprisonsprojectarandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingdihydrocodeineandbuprenorphineforopiatedetoxification
AT liryan leedsevaluationofefficacyofdetoxificationstudyleedsprisonsprojectarandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingdihydrocodeineandbuprenorphineforopiatedetoxification
AT tompkinscharlottene leedsevaluationofefficacyofdetoxificationstudyleedsprisonsprojectarandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingdihydrocodeineandbuprenorphineforopiatedetoxification