Cargando…

Three dimensional three component whole heart cardiovascular magnetic resonance velocity mapping: comparison of flow measurements from 3D and 2D acquisitions

BACKGROUND: Two-dimensional, unidirectionally encoded, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) velocity mapping is an established technique for the quantification of blood flow in large vessels. However, it requires an operator to correctly align the planes of acquisition. If all three directional c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brix, Lau, Ringgaard, Steffen, Rasmusson, Allan, Sørensen, Thomas Sangild, Kim, W Yong
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2649114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19232119
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-11-3
_version_ 1782165022513823744
author Brix, Lau
Ringgaard, Steffen
Rasmusson, Allan
Sørensen, Thomas Sangild
Kim, W Yong
author_facet Brix, Lau
Ringgaard, Steffen
Rasmusson, Allan
Sørensen, Thomas Sangild
Kim, W Yong
author_sort Brix, Lau
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Two-dimensional, unidirectionally encoded, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) velocity mapping is an established technique for the quantification of blood flow in large vessels. However, it requires an operator to correctly align the planes of acquisition. If all three directional components of velocity are measured for each voxel of a 3D volume through the phases of the cardiac cycle, blood flow through any chosen plane can potentially be calculated retrospectively. The initial acquisition is then more time consuming but relatively operator independent. AIMS: To compare the curves and volumes of flow derived from conventional 2D and comprehensive 3D flow acquisitions in a steady state flow model, and in vivo through planes transecting the ascending aorta and pulmonary trunk in 10 healthy volunteers. METHODS: Using a 1.5 T Phillips Intera CMR system, 3D acquisitions used an anisotropic 3D segmented k-space phase contrast gradient echo sequence with a short EPI readout, with prospective ECG and diaphragm navigator gating. The 2D acquisitions used segmented k-space phase contrast with prospective ECG and diaphragm navigator gating. Quantitative flow analyses were performed retrospectively with dedicated software for both the in vivo and in vitro acquisitions. RESULTS: Analysis of in vitro data found the 3D technique to have overestimated the continuous flow rate by approximately 5% across the entire applied flow range. In vivo, the 2D and the 3D techniques yielded similar volumetric flow curves and measurements. Aortic flow: (mean ± SD), 2D = 89.5 ± 13.5 ml & 3D = 92.7 ± 17.5 ml. Pulmonary flow: 2D = 98.8 ± 18.4 ml & 3D = 94.9 ± 19.0 ml). Each in vivo 3D acquisition took about 8 minutes or more. CONCLUSION: Flow measurements derived from the 3D and 2D acquisitions were comparable. Although time consuming, comprehensive 3D velocity acquisition could be relatively operator independent, and could potentially yield information on flow through several retrospectively chosen planes, for example in patients with congenital or valvular heart disease.
format Text
id pubmed-2649114
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26491142009-02-28 Three dimensional three component whole heart cardiovascular magnetic resonance velocity mapping: comparison of flow measurements from 3D and 2D acquisitions Brix, Lau Ringgaard, Steffen Rasmusson, Allan Sørensen, Thomas Sangild Kim, W Yong J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: Two-dimensional, unidirectionally encoded, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) velocity mapping is an established technique for the quantification of blood flow in large vessels. However, it requires an operator to correctly align the planes of acquisition. If all three directional components of velocity are measured for each voxel of a 3D volume through the phases of the cardiac cycle, blood flow through any chosen plane can potentially be calculated retrospectively. The initial acquisition is then more time consuming but relatively operator independent. AIMS: To compare the curves and volumes of flow derived from conventional 2D and comprehensive 3D flow acquisitions in a steady state flow model, and in vivo through planes transecting the ascending aorta and pulmonary trunk in 10 healthy volunteers. METHODS: Using a 1.5 T Phillips Intera CMR system, 3D acquisitions used an anisotropic 3D segmented k-space phase contrast gradient echo sequence with a short EPI readout, with prospective ECG and diaphragm navigator gating. The 2D acquisitions used segmented k-space phase contrast with prospective ECG and diaphragm navigator gating. Quantitative flow analyses were performed retrospectively with dedicated software for both the in vivo and in vitro acquisitions. RESULTS: Analysis of in vitro data found the 3D technique to have overestimated the continuous flow rate by approximately 5% across the entire applied flow range. In vivo, the 2D and the 3D techniques yielded similar volumetric flow curves and measurements. Aortic flow: (mean ± SD), 2D = 89.5 ± 13.5 ml & 3D = 92.7 ± 17.5 ml. Pulmonary flow: 2D = 98.8 ± 18.4 ml & 3D = 94.9 ± 19.0 ml). Each in vivo 3D acquisition took about 8 minutes or more. CONCLUSION: Flow measurements derived from the 3D and 2D acquisitions were comparable. Although time consuming, comprehensive 3D velocity acquisition could be relatively operator independent, and could potentially yield information on flow through several retrospectively chosen planes, for example in patients with congenital or valvular heart disease. BioMed Central 2009-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2649114/ /pubmed/19232119 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-11-3 Text en Copyright © 2009 Brix et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Brix, Lau
Ringgaard, Steffen
Rasmusson, Allan
Sørensen, Thomas Sangild
Kim, W Yong
Three dimensional three component whole heart cardiovascular magnetic resonance velocity mapping: comparison of flow measurements from 3D and 2D acquisitions
title Three dimensional three component whole heart cardiovascular magnetic resonance velocity mapping: comparison of flow measurements from 3D and 2D acquisitions
title_full Three dimensional three component whole heart cardiovascular magnetic resonance velocity mapping: comparison of flow measurements from 3D and 2D acquisitions
title_fullStr Three dimensional three component whole heart cardiovascular magnetic resonance velocity mapping: comparison of flow measurements from 3D and 2D acquisitions
title_full_unstemmed Three dimensional three component whole heart cardiovascular magnetic resonance velocity mapping: comparison of flow measurements from 3D and 2D acquisitions
title_short Three dimensional three component whole heart cardiovascular magnetic resonance velocity mapping: comparison of flow measurements from 3D and 2D acquisitions
title_sort three dimensional three component whole heart cardiovascular magnetic resonance velocity mapping: comparison of flow measurements from 3d and 2d acquisitions
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2649114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19232119
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-11-3
work_keys_str_mv AT brixlau threedimensionalthreecomponentwholeheartcardiovascularmagneticresonancevelocitymappingcomparisonofflowmeasurementsfrom3dand2dacquisitions
AT ringgaardsteffen threedimensionalthreecomponentwholeheartcardiovascularmagneticresonancevelocitymappingcomparisonofflowmeasurementsfrom3dand2dacquisitions
AT rasmussonallan threedimensionalthreecomponentwholeheartcardiovascularmagneticresonancevelocitymappingcomparisonofflowmeasurementsfrom3dand2dacquisitions
AT sørensenthomassangild threedimensionalthreecomponentwholeheartcardiovascularmagneticresonancevelocitymappingcomparisonofflowmeasurementsfrom3dand2dacquisitions
AT kimwyong threedimensionalthreecomponentwholeheartcardiovascularmagneticresonancevelocitymappingcomparisonofflowmeasurementsfrom3dand2dacquisitions