Cargando…

How Well Does the Target INR Level Maintain in Warfarin-Treated Patients with Non-ValvularAtrial Fibrillation?

PURPOSE: Although warfarin is an effective oral anticoagulation (OAC) drug to reduce the risk of thromboembolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), long term follow-up data are scarce to be certain whether the target INR level is maintained in warfarin-treated patients in Kore...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Jun Hyung, Song, Young Bin, Shin, Dae Hee, Kim, Je Sang, Choi, Jin-Oh, On, Young Kun, Kim, June Soo
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2649856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19259353
http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2009.50.1.83
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: Although warfarin is an effective oral anticoagulation (OAC) drug to reduce the risk of thromboembolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), long term follow-up data are scarce to be certain whether the target INR level is maintained in warfarin-treated patients in Korea. The aim of this study was to evaluate how well INRs are maintained within the target range using a new index, INR stability (= 100 × number of INRs within target range/total number of INR measurements) which we made, and to find out any correlation between thromboembolic events and INR stability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was an observational analysis of retrospectively collected data of 129 patients with NVAF from April 2000 to December 2005 at a single tertiary hospital. All patients were registered at the anticoagulation service. RESULTS: The median duration of follow up was 2.03 years (interquartile range 1.35 - 2.96). During the follow-up period, 60.9 ± 14.9% of the INR were within the target INR range. INR stability was not significantly different between patients without and with stroke (61.2 ± 15.0% vs 53.3 ± 4.9%). Among the known factors affecting fluctuations of the INR value, the most frequent factor was noncompliance (41.8%). CONCLUSION: The present study showed that it was not enough to maintain INR values within the target range in warfarin-treated patients with NVAF even at a tertiary hospital. Noncompliance is an important problem which interferes with maintaining target INR range.