Cargando…

Brachytherapy versus radical hysterectomy after external beam chemoradiation: a non-randomized matched comparison in IB2-IIB cervical cancer patients

BACKGROUND: A current paradigm in the treatment of cervical cancer with radiation therapy is that intracavitary brachytherapy is an essential component of radical treatment. This is a matched retrospective comparison of the results of treatment in patients treated with external beam chemoradiation (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cetina, Lucely, Garcia-Arias, Alicia, Candelaria, Myrna, Cantú, David, Rivera, Lesbia, Coronel, Jaime, Bazan-Perkins, Blanca, Flores, Vladimir, Gonzalez, Aaron, Dueñas-González, Alfonso
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2649933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19220882
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-7-19
_version_ 1782165077401534464
author Cetina, Lucely
Garcia-Arias, Alicia
Candelaria, Myrna
Cantú, David
Rivera, Lesbia
Coronel, Jaime
Bazan-Perkins, Blanca
Flores, Vladimir
Gonzalez, Aaron
Dueñas-González, Alfonso
author_facet Cetina, Lucely
Garcia-Arias, Alicia
Candelaria, Myrna
Cantú, David
Rivera, Lesbia
Coronel, Jaime
Bazan-Perkins, Blanca
Flores, Vladimir
Gonzalez, Aaron
Dueñas-González, Alfonso
author_sort Cetina, Lucely
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A current paradigm in the treatment of cervical cancer with radiation therapy is that intracavitary brachytherapy is an essential component of radical treatment. This is a matched retrospective comparison of the results of treatment in patients treated with external beam chemoradiation (EBRT-CT) and radical hysterectomy versus those treated with identical chemoradiation followed by brachytherapy. METHODS: In this non-randomized comparison EBRT-CT protocol was the same in both groups of 40 patients. In the standard treated patients, EBRT-CT was followed by one or two intracavitary Cesium (low-dose rate) applications within 2 weeks of finishing external radiation to reach a point A dose of at least 85 Gy. In the surgically treated patients, radical hysterectomy with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection and para-aortic lymph node sampling were performed within 7 weeks after EBRT-CT. Response, toxicity and survival were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 80 patients were analyzed. The patients receiving EBRT-CT and surgery were matched with the standard treated cases. There were no differences in the clinicopathological characteristics between groups or in the delivery of EBRT-CT. The pattern of acute and late toxicity differed. Standard treated patients had more chronic proctitis while the surgically treated had acute complications of surgery and hydronephrosis. At a maximum follow-up of 60 months, median follow-up 26 (2–31) and 22 (3–27) months for the surgery and standard therapy respectively, eight patients per group have recurred and died. The progression free and overall survival are the same in both groups. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that radical hysterectomy can be used after EBRT-CT without compromising survival in FIGO stage IB2-IIB cervical cancer patients in settings were brachytherapy is not available. A randomized study is needed to uncover the value of surgery after EBRT-CT.
format Text
id pubmed-2649933
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26499332009-03-03 Brachytherapy versus radical hysterectomy after external beam chemoradiation: a non-randomized matched comparison in IB2-IIB cervical cancer patients Cetina, Lucely Garcia-Arias, Alicia Candelaria, Myrna Cantú, David Rivera, Lesbia Coronel, Jaime Bazan-Perkins, Blanca Flores, Vladimir Gonzalez, Aaron Dueñas-González, Alfonso World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: A current paradigm in the treatment of cervical cancer with radiation therapy is that intracavitary brachytherapy is an essential component of radical treatment. This is a matched retrospective comparison of the results of treatment in patients treated with external beam chemoradiation (EBRT-CT) and radical hysterectomy versus those treated with identical chemoradiation followed by brachytherapy. METHODS: In this non-randomized comparison EBRT-CT protocol was the same in both groups of 40 patients. In the standard treated patients, EBRT-CT was followed by one or two intracavitary Cesium (low-dose rate) applications within 2 weeks of finishing external radiation to reach a point A dose of at least 85 Gy. In the surgically treated patients, radical hysterectomy with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection and para-aortic lymph node sampling were performed within 7 weeks after EBRT-CT. Response, toxicity and survival were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 80 patients were analyzed. The patients receiving EBRT-CT and surgery were matched with the standard treated cases. There were no differences in the clinicopathological characteristics between groups or in the delivery of EBRT-CT. The pattern of acute and late toxicity differed. Standard treated patients had more chronic proctitis while the surgically treated had acute complications of surgery and hydronephrosis. At a maximum follow-up of 60 months, median follow-up 26 (2–31) and 22 (3–27) months for the surgery and standard therapy respectively, eight patients per group have recurred and died. The progression free and overall survival are the same in both groups. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that radical hysterectomy can be used after EBRT-CT without compromising survival in FIGO stage IB2-IIB cervical cancer patients in settings were brachytherapy is not available. A randomized study is needed to uncover the value of surgery after EBRT-CT. BioMed Central 2009-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC2649933/ /pubmed/19220882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-7-19 Text en Copyright © 2009 Cetina et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Cetina, Lucely
Garcia-Arias, Alicia
Candelaria, Myrna
Cantú, David
Rivera, Lesbia
Coronel, Jaime
Bazan-Perkins, Blanca
Flores, Vladimir
Gonzalez, Aaron
Dueñas-González, Alfonso
Brachytherapy versus radical hysterectomy after external beam chemoradiation: a non-randomized matched comparison in IB2-IIB cervical cancer patients
title Brachytherapy versus radical hysterectomy after external beam chemoradiation: a non-randomized matched comparison in IB2-IIB cervical cancer patients
title_full Brachytherapy versus radical hysterectomy after external beam chemoradiation: a non-randomized matched comparison in IB2-IIB cervical cancer patients
title_fullStr Brachytherapy versus radical hysterectomy after external beam chemoradiation: a non-randomized matched comparison in IB2-IIB cervical cancer patients
title_full_unstemmed Brachytherapy versus radical hysterectomy after external beam chemoradiation: a non-randomized matched comparison in IB2-IIB cervical cancer patients
title_short Brachytherapy versus radical hysterectomy after external beam chemoradiation: a non-randomized matched comparison in IB2-IIB cervical cancer patients
title_sort brachytherapy versus radical hysterectomy after external beam chemoradiation: a non-randomized matched comparison in ib2-iib cervical cancer patients
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2649933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19220882
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-7-19
work_keys_str_mv AT cetinalucely brachytherapyversusradicalhysterectomyafterexternalbeamchemoradiationanonrandomizedmatchedcomparisoninib2iibcervicalcancerpatients
AT garciaariasalicia brachytherapyversusradicalhysterectomyafterexternalbeamchemoradiationanonrandomizedmatchedcomparisoninib2iibcervicalcancerpatients
AT candelariamyrna brachytherapyversusradicalhysterectomyafterexternalbeamchemoradiationanonrandomizedmatchedcomparisoninib2iibcervicalcancerpatients
AT cantudavid brachytherapyversusradicalhysterectomyafterexternalbeamchemoradiationanonrandomizedmatchedcomparisoninib2iibcervicalcancerpatients
AT riveralesbia brachytherapyversusradicalhysterectomyafterexternalbeamchemoradiationanonrandomizedmatchedcomparisoninib2iibcervicalcancerpatients
AT coroneljaime brachytherapyversusradicalhysterectomyafterexternalbeamchemoradiationanonrandomizedmatchedcomparisoninib2iibcervicalcancerpatients
AT bazanperkinsblanca brachytherapyversusradicalhysterectomyafterexternalbeamchemoradiationanonrandomizedmatchedcomparisoninib2iibcervicalcancerpatients
AT floresvladimir brachytherapyversusradicalhysterectomyafterexternalbeamchemoradiationanonrandomizedmatchedcomparisoninib2iibcervicalcancerpatients
AT gonzalezaaron brachytherapyversusradicalhysterectomyafterexternalbeamchemoradiationanonrandomizedmatchedcomparisoninib2iibcervicalcancerpatients
AT duenasgonzalezalfonso brachytherapyversusradicalhysterectomyafterexternalbeamchemoradiationanonrandomizedmatchedcomparisoninib2iibcervicalcancerpatients