Cargando…

Inequalities in the incidence of cervical cancer in South East England 2001–2005: an investigation of population risk factors

BACKGROUND: The incidence of cervical cancer varies dramatically, both globally and within individual countries. The age-standardised incidence of cervical cancer was compared across primary care trusts (PCTs) in South East England, taking into account the prevalence of known behavioural risk factor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Currin, Laura G, Jack, Ruth H, Linklater, Karen M, Mak, Vivian, Møller, Henrik, Davies, Elizabeth A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2650689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19232085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-62
_version_ 1782165107378225152
author Currin, Laura G
Jack, Ruth H
Linklater, Karen M
Mak, Vivian
Møller, Henrik
Davies, Elizabeth A
author_facet Currin, Laura G
Jack, Ruth H
Linklater, Karen M
Mak, Vivian
Møller, Henrik
Davies, Elizabeth A
author_sort Currin, Laura G
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The incidence of cervical cancer varies dramatically, both globally and within individual countries. The age-standardised incidence of cervical cancer was compared across primary care trusts (PCTs) in South East England, taking into account the prevalence of known behavioural risk factors, screening coverage and the deprivation of the area. METHODS: Data on 2,231 cases diagnosed between 2001 and 2005 were extracted from the Thames Cancer Registry, and data on risk factors and screening coverage were collated from publicly available sources. Age-standardised incidence rates were calculated for each PCT using cases of squamous cell carcinoma in the screening age group (25–64 years). RESULTS: The age-standardised incidence rate for cervical cancer in South East England was 6.7 per 100,000 population (European standard) but varied 3.1 fold between individual PCTs. Correlations between the age-standardised incidence rate and smoking prevalence, teenage conception rates, and deprivation were highly significant at the PCT level (p < 0.001). However, screening coverage was not associated with the incidence of cervical cancer at the PCT level. Poisson regression indicated that these variables were all highly correlated and could not determine the level of independent contribution at a population level. CONCLUSION: There is excess disease burden within South East England. Significant public health gains can be made by reducing exposure to known risk factors at a population level.
format Text
id pubmed-2650689
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26506892009-03-04 Inequalities in the incidence of cervical cancer in South East England 2001–2005: an investigation of population risk factors Currin, Laura G Jack, Ruth H Linklater, Karen M Mak, Vivian Møller, Henrik Davies, Elizabeth A BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The incidence of cervical cancer varies dramatically, both globally and within individual countries. The age-standardised incidence of cervical cancer was compared across primary care trusts (PCTs) in South East England, taking into account the prevalence of known behavioural risk factors, screening coverage and the deprivation of the area. METHODS: Data on 2,231 cases diagnosed between 2001 and 2005 were extracted from the Thames Cancer Registry, and data on risk factors and screening coverage were collated from publicly available sources. Age-standardised incidence rates were calculated for each PCT using cases of squamous cell carcinoma in the screening age group (25–64 years). RESULTS: The age-standardised incidence rate for cervical cancer in South East England was 6.7 per 100,000 population (European standard) but varied 3.1 fold between individual PCTs. Correlations between the age-standardised incidence rate and smoking prevalence, teenage conception rates, and deprivation were highly significant at the PCT level (p < 0.001). However, screening coverage was not associated with the incidence of cervical cancer at the PCT level. Poisson regression indicated that these variables were all highly correlated and could not determine the level of independent contribution at a population level. CONCLUSION: There is excess disease burden within South East England. Significant public health gains can be made by reducing exposure to known risk factors at a population level. BioMed Central 2009-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2650689/ /pubmed/19232085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-62 Text en Copyright © 2009 Currin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Currin, Laura G
Jack, Ruth H
Linklater, Karen M
Mak, Vivian
Møller, Henrik
Davies, Elizabeth A
Inequalities in the incidence of cervical cancer in South East England 2001–2005: an investigation of population risk factors
title Inequalities in the incidence of cervical cancer in South East England 2001–2005: an investigation of population risk factors
title_full Inequalities in the incidence of cervical cancer in South East England 2001–2005: an investigation of population risk factors
title_fullStr Inequalities in the incidence of cervical cancer in South East England 2001–2005: an investigation of population risk factors
title_full_unstemmed Inequalities in the incidence of cervical cancer in South East England 2001–2005: an investigation of population risk factors
title_short Inequalities in the incidence of cervical cancer in South East England 2001–2005: an investigation of population risk factors
title_sort inequalities in the incidence of cervical cancer in south east england 2001–2005: an investigation of population risk factors
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2650689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19232085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-62
work_keys_str_mv AT currinlaurag inequalitiesintheincidenceofcervicalcancerinsoutheastengland20012005aninvestigationofpopulationriskfactors
AT jackruthh inequalitiesintheincidenceofcervicalcancerinsoutheastengland20012005aninvestigationofpopulationriskfactors
AT linklaterkarenm inequalitiesintheincidenceofcervicalcancerinsoutheastengland20012005aninvestigationofpopulationriskfactors
AT makvivian inequalitiesintheincidenceofcervicalcancerinsoutheastengland20012005aninvestigationofpopulationriskfactors
AT møllerhenrik inequalitiesintheincidenceofcervicalcancerinsoutheastengland20012005aninvestigationofpopulationriskfactors
AT davieselizabetha inequalitiesintheincidenceofcervicalcancerinsoutheastengland20012005aninvestigationofpopulationriskfactors